• Privacy Policy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
Climate Change Dispatch
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
Climate Change Dispatch
No Result
View All Result

The Hypocrisy Of Biofuels

by Lynne Balzer, guest post
October 17, 2019, 1:34 PM
in News and Opinion
Reading Time: 6 mins read
A A
12
Share on FacebookShare on XwitterShare on Linkedin

biomass wood power plantIt’s amazing that self-proclaimed environmental activists can point fingers from their city dwellings and accuse farmers of destroying the environment.

Recently, a great fuss was made of the fact that farmers in Brazil were burning off their fields in preparation for the growing season.

An article appearing on the MPR News website on Aug. 8, 2019, discussed a United Nations IPCC report evaluating the effects of agriculture, deforestation and other land use on greenhouse gas emissions, which they say generates about a third of all human greenhouse gas emissions (over 40% of methane).

“Emissions from agricultural production are projected to increase,” says this report. “Delaying action” to solve this problem could cause “irreversible impacts on some ecosystems.”

Yet ironically, millions of acres of the farmland in Brazil is now used for growing sugar cane for – you guessed it – ethanol. In the United States, the crop converted into ethanol is corn. Ethanol, or ethyl alcohol, is the same kind of alcohol used in alcoholic drinks.

In the 1970s, the OPEC nations arbitrarily cut their oil exports to raise the price of oil, creating fuel shortages. At that time, it was believed that petroleum was a scarce, nonrenewable resource.

With more oil fields being discovered every year, however, we now know that this isn’t the case at all.

The real reason ethanol began to be added to gasoline in the United States was a deal a group of Democrats led by Congressman Henry Waxman made with the corn lobby decades ago.

In exchange for its financial support of their political campaigns, they engineered a mandate to blend corn-derived ethanol with gasoline as an amendment to the 1990 Clean Air Act.

Advertised as another great source of alternative, clean energy to solve the world’s energy problems, ethanol started being added to gasoline in amounts up to 15% without the consent of the consumer.

It is now difficult in many parts of the United States to find service stations that offer consumers the option of pure gasoline without ethanol.

This is true even though gasoline containing ethanol quickly destroys boat and lawnmower engines.

Many consumers have had the unfortunate experience of having lawnmowers and rototillers destroyed because they were never warned about the damage the gasoline/ethanol mixture causes in these small engines. Ethanol-blended gasoline can be devastating to power equipment.

It damages rubber and plastic components of fuel systems, especially in older models built of materials that aren’t resistant to this type of damage.

This includes gaskets, which become brittle, two-cycle carburetors and primer and return lines, which start leaking after a while.

If this type of fuel isn’t burned within as short a time as sixty days, it will literally decay. This is because ethanol fuels are hygroscopic. They attract water, and fuel separation can occur and damage the engine’s carburetor.

A fuel that has decayed in this way contains varnish and sludge deposits. A fuel that is 15% ethanol, called E85, cannot be used in a vehicle unless its engine has been modified.

With biofuel mandates now in over 60 nations, the competition between ethanol and food for agricultural land has become a moral issue. Groups like Oxfam and the Environmental Working Group oppose biofuels because they raise food prices.

Ethanol production has become a big business. Millions of acres of virgin prairie and wetlands have been plowed up for the first time ever.

The increased use of nitrate fertilizers in growing these crops has caused massive runoffs of nitrates into creeks and rivers, contaminating water supplies in Midwestern states. Cleaning up this water has become very costly.

An article by Daniel Strohl reported a study concluding that 4.2 million acres of additional land, an area double the size of Yellowstone national park, is now being used for such farming practices.

A gallon of gasoline delivers 116,900 BTUs [British Thermal Units] of energy, but a gallon of ethanol delivers only 76,000 BTUs of energy, about two-thirds the amount of energy from ethanol as gasoline delivers.

So, a car gets fewer miles per gallon of gasoline/ethanol blend as it does on pure gasoline. According to David Pimentel in an article published in the Harvard Review, it costs $3.95 to produce one gallon of ethanol from corn.

He also reported that “nearly 9 billion gallons of ethanol is produced in the United States, using about 33 percent of US corn grain. Yet these nine billion gallons of ethanol represent only 1.3 percent of total oil consumption in the United States.”

And at the same time, almost 800 million people in the world are malnourished.

The UN’s Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) reported a 45% increase in the world food price index during the 2008 food crisis.

In just one year, wheat prices increased by 130%, soy prices rose 87%, rice 74%, and maize prices by 31%. A big cause of this crisis was the growing demand for biofuels.

Government subsidies for the corn industry include tax breaks, grants, loans, and loan guarantees. The amount of such subsidies has been estimated by a Purdue University study at between $1.42 and $1.87 per gallon of ethanol, raising everyone’s tax bill.

Consumers are paying for this through increased fuel prices resulting from having to fill up more often due to decreased engine efficiency and miles per gallon.

In 2007, as part of the Energy Independence and Security Act (EISA) passed by Congress, the Renewable Fuel Standard version 2 (RFS2) committed the United States to the production of fifteen billion gallons of corn ethanol per year by 2015.

The University of Minnesota and the University of Wisconsin, along with the National Wildlife Federation, conducted a comprehensive analysis of land-use change across the US as a result of the passage of this bill.

The leader of this study, Chris Wright, expressed his concern that native grassland was being converted to agricultural land, with a very negative impact on the environment.

The Environmental Protection Agency noted in 2011 that this practice is causing increased soil erosion and loss of wildlife habitat. These are unfortunate and unintended consequences of using this type of alternative energy.

“It is now clear that the federal corn ethanol mandate has driven up food prices, strained agricultural markets, increased competition for arable land and promoted the conversion of uncultivated land to grow crops. In addition, previous estimates have dramatically underestimated corn ethanol’s greenhouse gas emissions by failing to account for changes in land use.”

These ill-advised federal biofuel policies have also adversely affected farmers who raise livestock and related businesses because it costs more to buy corn and soy needed for feeding animals.

It is downright immoral to use agricultural land that could be growing food for fuel. The revolution in Egypt called “Arab Spring” started with riots caused by food shortages that were directly caused by this newly instituted practice.

But then, believe it or not, “human-caused climate change” was blamed for these rising food prices.

Herr Jean Ziegler commented, “It is a crime against humanity to convert agricultural productive soil into soil which produces foodstuff that will be burned as biofuel.”

Biodiesel fuel is a blend of about 80% petroleum diesel and 20% biodiesel, which is produced by treating soybean or another oil with methanol and a catalyst.

This industry receives substantial government subsidies from the Biomass Crop Assistance Program (BCAP 9010).

Producers are reimbursed up to 50% of their cost with payments extending for up to five years for herbaceous feedstock and up to 15 years for woody plants.

Section 9003 of the Biorefinery Assistance Program guarantees loans to producers for the construction, development, and retrofitting of commercial-scale biorefineries.

Here again, these alternative sources of fuel are viable and competitive only by placing a substantial burden on the taxpayer. In some states such as Massachusetts, forests are clear cut, and the trees are ground up and burned to produce energy.

These forests are replanted with just one or two species of trees, reducing biodiversity from 10-20 species of trees to just one or two species. This practice is harmful to the environment in many ways, disrupting the balance of nature in these habitats.

Forests owned by the state of Massachusetts “are being logged at drastic, nearly clear-cut levels and at unsustainable rates,” reported R. G. Cachat, in the article, “Massachusetts: The Hoax of Biomass and Modern Forestry”.

Biomass is an appealing ‘easy out’ for wasteful energy policies and land barons hungry for quick cash. This sweetheart deal for big landholders is being sold as ‘carbon neutral’, but is really a carbon hoax.

Burning wood produces about 1.5 times as much carbon dioxide per unit of energy as burning coal. Forests in North Carolina are clear cut and the wood shipped 3000 miles to be burned in an electric generating plant in Britain. Why? To meet the alternative energy quota imposed on them by the European Union. This makes no sense.

Since there is now a surplus of petroleum and natural gas, there is no need for ethanol and other biofuels that compete with the raising of crops for human consumption and otherwise damage the environment.

The government policies responsible for this scam represent the epitome of incompetence, corruption or a combination of the two.


Lynne Balzer taught science at the high school and college levels for about twenty years. A project director for Faraday Science Institute, she has studied this issue for a long time. Her new book, The Green New Deal and Climate Change: What You Need to Know, is available from Amazon in paperback and Kindle format.

  • Truth
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Gettr
  • Threads
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Mastodon
  • Buffer
  • Telegram
  • Email
  • Copy Link
  • Share Using More Networks…
Share via
  • Facebook
  • Like
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Digg
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Skype
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky

Join our list

Subscribe to our mailing list and get interesting stuff and updates to your email inbox.

Thank you for subscribing.

Something went wrong.

We respect your privacy and take protecting it seriously

Related Posts

Extreme Weather

Climatologist Rebuts ‘Hottest Year Ever’ Claims: ‘Not Even Close’

May 16, 2025
Bipolar

Antarctic and Arctic Ice Trends Defy Climate Models And Dire Predictions

May 16, 2025
Energy

Pennsylvania Supreme Court Presses Officials On RGGI Carbon Tax

May 16, 2025

Comments 12

  1. pater eusebius tenebrarum says:
    6 years ago

    “The government policies responsible for this scam represent the epitome of incompetence, corruption or a combination of the two.” – That is it, in a nutshell. It’s a combination of scientific illiteracy and cronyism.

  2. Sonnyhill says:
    6 years ago

    What crop(s) would you ask farmers to plant instead of corn?
    Fruits and vegetables are in good supply. They’re perishable, so oversupply leads to disposal.
    There’s a conservation reserve program for marginal land in the USA. Farmers are paid to idle land, which reduces erosion and run – off. If this is what you’d like to see more of, push policy makers to increase funding.

    • Lynne P Balzer says:
      6 years ago

      They should plant whatever grows well in their situation. Many fruits and vegetables are in short supply and this increases demand and prices. If you ever do any grocery shopping you must be aware of how the price of groceries has skyrocketed in recent years. Really – have you priced cabbage, apples and sweet potatoes recently? It’s becoming more and more difficult for those on fixed incomes (social security and disability) to make ends meet. This includes the price of meat, especially beef.

  3. Sonnyhill says:
    6 years ago

    Before biofuels, American farmers produced about 10 billion bushels of corn per year. That has risen to 15 billion since. That increase covers the 5 billion used to produce ethanol.
    Also, the fermentation process consumes the sugar and starch in corn. Protein passes through intact and is sold as a livestock feed supplement. High fructose corn syrup is produced by corn millers.

    • Lynne P Balzer says:
      6 years ago

      The increase in corn production is a direct result of the ethanol industry. It’s not that there’s less corn available but that other food crops could have been planted in place of the crop destined for ethanol production. It’s also very sad that millions of acres of virgin prairie had to be cultivated to produce all of this ethanol, which, considering our current surpluses, is unnecessary. This is a worldwide problem.

  4. Sonnyhill says:
    6 years ago

    Balzer couldn’t find one benefit in biofuels. Hardly a balanced article. Research the WASDE report (world agricultural supply and demand estimate). Ethanol production does not steal food from the world’s poor. What it has accomplished is a larger carry over in year-over-year grain stocks, a boom in genetic innovation and engineering, jobs in small towns that were vanishing.
    The GOP retains power in fly over country because farmers are business men first, environmentalists second.

    • Lynne P Balzer says:
      6 years ago

      Is it more important to be balanced or truthful? The use of one third of our corn crop for the ethanol has raised the price of all kinds of food. Even worse, high fructose corn syrup, which is not a natural sugar, is a byproduct of the ethanol industry. In the United States it is heavily subsidized with our tax dollars. But this is a worldwide problem, and poor people are definitely not eating as well because of the high price of food.

  5. David Lewis says:
    6 years ago

    Even many environmentalists realize that ethanol doesn’t make sense, but there is a huge lobby out there that will protect the current mandates. One of my cars that I’m not currently running with a 550 engine had to have the carburetor rebuilt once a year if it is run on ethanol E10. In our area it is possible to find stations that sell gas without ethanol but they are too far away to be practical. We drove from Washington State to Nebraska this last summer and ironically right in the middle of the Corn Belt most stations that we stopped at had ethanol free gasoline.

    Cutting down forests for bio-fuel shows that the environmentalists have abandoned their historic values. The article made a point that replacing a forest with 20 species of trees with 2 species, has a big impact on biodiversity. However, it isn’t just the trees. A forest with only 2 tree species isn’t going to be able to support the same diversity of animals as a forest with 20 tree species.

    • Dave O says:
      6 years ago

      And replacing plastic bags and bottles with paper and glass. I remember the phrase, use plastic bags to save a tree. I guess the environmentalists don’t care about trees anymore.

    • Lynne Balzer says:
      6 years ago

      This is a good point. The biodiversity of other creatures hinges on the amount of biodiversity of the dominant organisms in an ecosystem. The only headway we can make against the ethanol lobby will be accomplished by a concerted effort by rational citizens to confront our lawmakers with these points. Average citizens seem to lack the will to sacrifice their time and money that has been exhibited by our hysterical Extinction Rebellion brothers and sisters.

  6. Dave O says:
    6 years ago

    Stop the Global warming hoax and ethanol hoax. Both born of scientifically challenged planners.

  7. Rhee says:
    6 years ago

    A refinery in the CA bay area experienced an massive fire this week where a quarter million gallons of ethanol in two storage containers exploded in a huge fireball.

Stay Connected On Social Media

gab-logo

Donate Today

Beating back the alarmist narrative takes time and money. Please donate today to help!

Recent Posts

  • city summer sunClimatologist Rebuts ‘Hottest Year Ever’ Claims: ‘Not Even Close’
    May 16, 2025
    Media headlines say it's the hottest year ever—but the real climate story gets buried under data tricks, historical erasure, and narrative control. […]
  • Antarctica sea lionsAntarctic and Arctic Ice Trends Defy Climate Models And Dire Predictions
    May 16, 2025
    New data shows Antarctic ice is growing and Arctic sea ice has stabilized—raising serious questions about climate models and mainstream climate claims. […]
  • power lines electricityPennsylvania Supreme Court Presses Officials On RGGI Carbon Tax
    May 16, 2025
    Pennsylvania's high court grilled state officials about whether the money it wants to collect from the RGGI pact constitutes a fee or a tax. […]
  • german wind farmGerman Wind Slump Triggers Energy Losses, Industry Turmoil
    May 15, 2025
    Germany's wind power output plunged in 2025 as wind speeds hit a 50-year low, slashing profits and sparking doubts about energy reliability. […]
  • Geothermal PlantGeothermal Gold Rush: U.S. Digs Deep To Power the Future
    May 15, 2025
    America is racing to unlock geothermal energy using shale-era tech — and it could power AI, homes, and industry while cutting reliance on China. […]
  • mississippi floodingDebunking The Weather Attribution Theater Playbook
    May 15, 2025
    The media exaggerates climate change flooding in the Mississippi Valley, ignoring peer-reviewed science for so-called attribution science. […]
  • the climate change graph that liedExposed: The Global Warming Graph That Duped The World
    May 15, 2025
    This viral video exposes the truth behind the iconic climate change graph used to justify extreme policies and global warming panic. […]
  • gov kathy hochulTrump Dismantles Biden’s Climate Legacy While New York Chases Green Delusions
    May 14, 2025
    As Trump unravels Biden’s costly climate agenda, New York doubles down on its net zero fantasy despite no federal backing and no workable plan. […]
  • Hurricane WindsThe Media Hype Extreme Weather—But Data Tells A Different Tale
    May 14, 2025
    Despite rising alarm over extreme weather, Americans are safer than ever from natural disasters thanks to better forecasting, buildings, and tech. […]
  • gavel earth money courtTrial Lawyers To Swamp Louisiana Energy Sector With Climate Lawfare After Chevron Verdict
    May 14, 2025
    A $745M verdict in Louisiana's Plaquemines Parish kicked off a wave of lawsuits that could gut the state's energy sector under the guise of eco justice. […]

Get Instant Email Notifications

Enter your email address to receive notifications of new posts by email either instantly or daily. Check your Junk folder for any verification emails upon subscribing.

Submit a tip

Please enter your email, so we know you're human.

Books We Like

very convenient warming

exposing great lie

Have a suggestion? Let us know! We swap out books based on your input. We participate in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. See here.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us

© Portions copyright Climate Change Dispatch

Share via
  • Threads
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Mastodon
  • Buffer
  • Telegram
  • Email
  • Copy Link
  • Share Using More Networks…
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us

© 2025 Climate Change Dispatch