In the popular imagination, veganism and environmentalism go hand-in-hand.
Both are championed – often in one voice – by ultra-progressive types who protest that we should live more ethically and responsibly in order to save the planet.
Both types argue that eating less methane-emitting cattle and consuming more agriculturally-efficient crops is the first step we can all make as individuals into halting climate change.
A report published by the UK Sustainable Food Trust not only implicitly challenges the assumption that veganism and environmentalism work in symbiosis, it tacitly suggests that the two movements may be in actual conflict with each other.
It calls upon vegans to stop drinking soy milk in order to save the planet, and that milk from cows – especially cows grazed on grass rather than imported soya beans – is much better for a sustainable planet.
‘Vegans and others who buy milk substitutes made from soya for their latte and cappuccino, or breakfast cereal, are also harming the planet. They would do better to switch to milk from cows… if they want to help make a more sustainable planet,’ the report states.
Global production of soya beans and palm oils has doubled over the past 20 years and continues to rise. The two account for 90 percent of global vegetable oil production and are used in processed foods, animal feed, and non-food products.
Many of us are attuned to the devastation caused to rainforests by palm oil cultivation, but less well known is comparable ruination caused by soya bean production: and the cultivation of both is having terrible consequences.
Soya milk is only the most glaring battle-ground between vegans and environmentalism.
Veganism, as practiced today, is mostly the preserve of the cosmopolitan middle-classes, whose diet often include quinoa imported from South America, almonds from California, pomegranates from India, beans from Brazil, goji berries China and soya from south-east Asia – this soya will, in turn, be transformed into processed vegan burgers and vegan sausages.
Most popular plant-based proteins, including chickpeas, lentils, and chia seeds, are also usually flown thousands of miles to reach their consumers in the UK.
Another dairy product substitute, almond milk, begins life on the monocultural landscape of the almond plains of California, where the almonds are doused in pesticides and fungicides, before being flown thousands of miles to the UK. (It requires a colossal 130 pints of water to produce just one glass of almond milk).
The use of fertilizer, fungicides, pesticides, and herbicides has long been a feature of industrial crops producing maize and grains.
The appetite for voguish vegan food can have a devastating effect on local economies. In 2013, prices of quinoa rocketed to such an extent that those growing the grain in the Andes, where it plays a central part in the local diet, could no longer afford it.
Not all conventional fruit and vegetables are environmentally-friendly, either. The UK imports strawberries and blueberries from continental Europe and the US when they are out of season here, generating their own carbon footprint.
And perhaps the biggest sinner is the asparagus. Research by Angelina Frankowska at Manchester University recently found that asparagus eaten in the UK has the highest carbon footprint of any vegetable here, mostly because it is imported from Peru and because of the vegetable’s thirsty nature and demand for land.
Another environmental villain that we take for granted is the avocado, a staple of the hipster vegan diet, and a similarly thirsty fruit.
A single mature avocado tree in California, Chile, or Mexico – areas that face chronic water shortages – needs up to 209 liters every day in the summer, before taking its journey by plane to the consumer.
The processed nature of much ‘vegan food’ is yet another problem. This February, Graham McAuliffe of the Rothamsted Institute, said that tofu has a worse carbon footprint than chicken, pork, or lamb.
The protein foodstuff has a larger carbon footprint than the meat it ostensibly replaces owing to the fact that it is processed and because it is made from soy milk.
The story is similar with cow-free vegan cheeses made from coconut oil. These require a warm tropical climate to grow and they are often imported from Pacific regions or Sri Lanka.
Read rest at Spectator AU
Climate Change is a political movement to create world wide one socialist government.It is built on a LIE, called Sustainability.Who could possibly oppose this? Unless it is a BIG LIE. The Davos Group are the same bloodless boring DULL unimaginative thinkers like Hitler , Stalin and Mao.THEY are going to save the world and you have to do as they say. Their lie like Socialism before it deceives . If it were true everyone would agree, but it is a Big Lie. Vegan diet is the first lie , Western civilization succeeds by many ideas coming from many sources not one Central bureaucracy which the One World Government is (animal Farm 2020) .I explained all this in an article, very long and you have to scroll down to Sustainability , but it may be worth your while.Note Mark Carney is mentioned. You may help save freedom https://medium.com/@edwardagreenhalgh/covid-19-world-econommic-collapse-under-the-rule-of-law-the-lock-downs-are-illegal-and-not-a-real-556c4b9b4ca8
To these Vegan Fools i wonder how many Birds and four footed critters are al chopped up every year so these nit-wits can have their garden Burgers and vegan stuff Its way too bad when these idiots don’t think about that like the idiots in the pictures
“To these Vegan Fools i wonder how many Birds and four footed critters are al chopped up every year”
Great comment by Spurwing Plover.
On going vegan to save the planet.
https://tambonthongchai.com/2020/06/19/vegandiet/
It is ironic that veganism and a belief in the need for ethanol biofuel go hand in hand.
Veganism requires more arable land than non-veganism does. Ethanol biofuels require more arable land than fossil fuels do.
If we embrace both, conservation values suffer.
Veganism and farmed bio-fuels are a recipe for disaster.
My KIA insists I use as little ethanol as possible. The onboard computer analyzes my fuel and keeps a record for the Dealer. IF I consistently use fuels with ethanol or exceed a stated percentage for anything but a very brief distance, my warranty could be cancelled. They also refuse to stand by mileage estimates with ethanol fuels, as consumption increases dramatically. Even as a 2017 model year, KIA states some items in the fuel system could be damaged and not warrantied.
Crops need cultivation, requiring fuel and chemicals to control weeds and diseases. Animals provide natural fertilizer for those crops and if we don’t have animals to fertilize them, it needs doing artificially.
Animals can eat weeds (like poison ivy) and other weeds that we cannot eat. We can then eat the animals. They are the perfect solution to provide nutrients from land that cannot otherwise be used to grow crops. They can restore prairies from deserts, providing more land to grow meat.
So now these Nit-Wits want to use this fake crisis of Global Warming/Climate Change to make us all go Vegan as shown the useful idiots in the picture the facts are what they reject and get into their imaginations Hitler was Vegan I guess this is proof that strict vegans might have shrinking Brains