• Privacy Policy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
Climate Change Dispatch
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
Climate Change Dispatch
No Result
View All Result

‘Hit the Panic Button’: Why The UK’s Electric Car Mandate Is Crashing

by Abby Wilson
November 29, 2024, 1:46 PM
in Electric Vehicles (EVs), News, Politics
A A
3
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

uk ev charging
This week’s announcement of plans to close a Vauxhall van factory in Luton underlines the UK’s ongoing struggle with the transition to electric vehicles (EVs). [emphasis, links added]

Experts say that EV uptake isn’t keeping up with the government’s plan for UK manufacturers to sell only zero-emission vehicles by 2030.

Stellantis, which owns Vauxhall and several other car brands, blamed its decision to close the Luton factory “on the UK’s ‘stringent’ zero-emission vehicle mandate, sparking a row over the viability of Labour targets”, said Yahoo News UK.

Car manufacturers face fines if they don’t comply with yearly EV sales targets, so they often offer discounts or promotions, but plateauing demand for EV vehicles has put even the most established car companies under stress.

Private motorists “are refusing to play ball with the government’s targets”, said The Spectator, which means “some very large fines are looming.”

What are the zero-emission targets?

In January, a government-backed pledge to switch entirely to electric vehicles by 2035 – the Zero Emission Vehicle (ZEV) mandate – was signed into law.

The mandate set incremental benchmarks, requiring car manufacturers to sell set percentages of EVs in each year leading up to the total ban.

This year, Labour leaders said it would reinstate the ZEV mandate’s original goal: 100% zero-emission vehicles by 2030.

“This is five years earlier than the original mandate target set by Rishi Sunak’s government – and demand carmakers say they can’t meet,” said the Daily Mail.

To meet the current goal, 28% of new cars and 16% of new vans sold in 2025 must be zero-emission.

And if makers can’t meet the benchmark, they must pay a fine: £15,000 [$19,099] for each non-compliant car and £18,000 [$22,919] for each non-compliant van.

Why are carmakers ‘hitting the panic button’?

This year, poor demand for EVs means manufacturers have struggled to meet the government’s targets. And many are now left with a difficult choice.

“To avoid fines, they say they are having to discount new vehicles heavily,” said BBC News. Or they are “subsidizing” rival companies which only build electric cars, and “none of which have a manufacturing base in the UK”.

Stellantis and other carmakers have “hit the panic button”, said the Daily Mail, and “slashed the costs of some of their EVs by as much as 35%”.

Car firms are taking an estimated £4bn hit to make discounts, the Society of Motor Manufacturers and Traders told the paper, and “has warned that the mandate will have ‘devastating impacts'” on businesses and jobs.

Ford has already announced it will cut 4,000 jobs across Europe, and Volkswagen is set to shut three of its factories in Germany “for the first time in the history of the company”, said The New York Times.

Jaguar, too, is undergoing a complete rebrand while it switches to 100% EV production.

“We need government-backed incentives to urgently boost the uptake of electric vehicles,” Ford UK’s managing director Lisa Brankin told the BBC.

The company has put hundreds of millions into bolstering its electric fleet but it isn’t seeing results. Without demand, Brankin said, the EV mandate “just won’t work”.

What’s the government’s response?

After Vauxhall’s announcement, the government seems to be paying closer attention to manufacturers’ demands.

Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds told car manufacturers he is ”profoundly concerned” about how the targets are panning out. “I don’t believe the policies that we have inherited, and I mean specifically in relation to zero-emission vehicles, are operating today in a way anyone intended them to,” he said, according to Yahoo News UK.

However, it seems clear that the government wants “to stick to a deadline of 2030 for phasing out the sale of new petrol and diesel-powered cars“, said the news site.

Top photo by John Cameron on Unsplash

Read rest at Yahoo! News

  • Truth
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Gettr
  • Threads
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Mastodon
  • Buffer
  • Telegram
  • Email
  • Copy Link
  • Share Using More Networks…
Share via
  • Facebook
  • Like
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Digg
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Skype
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky

Join our list

Subscribe to our mailing list and get interesting stuff and updates to your email inbox.

Thank you for subscribing.

Something went wrong.

We respect your privacy and take protecting it seriously

Related Posts

Energy

How Wind And Solar Sent Energy Prices Sky-High in ‘Green’ Countries

May 8, 2025
Money & Finance

Bernie Sanders Defends Private Jet Use, Says ‘He’s Too Important’ To Fly Coach

May 8, 2025
Energy

Green Energy Suicide: The West Pays The Price For Its Net-Zero Delusions

May 8, 2025

Comments 3

  1. Terry Mains says:
    5 months ago

    Premier Eby of British Columbia and Justin Trudeau also have same coercion going on in Canada. Every country is rejecting these vehicles because they are a backward step. Range is a problem; normally you are supposed to only charge them to 80%. If you want to charge them to 100%, it takes nearly twice as long to charge the vehicle. If you travel any distance in a large country like Canada, especially in the wintertime when it is -40C, you won’t get very far in an EV. If you have an accident with them and injure the battery, you might as well buy a new car. I have talked to many who own EV’s; they say travelling any distance is a major problem. One Tesla owner stated that he wore out a set of tires in one year.
    It takes 5-6 times the mining to produce an EV, which is the equivalent CO2 emissions of driving a conventional gas car 70,000 miles …. this amount of CO2 before it even hits the dealership…. if that is of any concern to you. This amount of mining will continue to raise the cost of EV’s as more mines will have to open; that means EV’s won’t be cheaper in the future. It takes 3-4 minutes to gas up an normal vehicle; it takes 10 times as long to charge an EV. Who has the time for this. If you charge with a level 2 charger at home that is the same as having your clothes dryer on for that time. A normal gas station has say 9 pumps. In order to charge EV’s at the same efficiency as a gas station, to avoid wait times for a charger to be available, service stations will have to have 5- 10 times the number of chargers, and a lot more real estate. Who pays for the electrical infrastructure for the massive amount of power required for a single service station that has to convert its electrical infrastructure. Answer… the owner of the EV. It will be more expensive to drive an EV than a gas or diesel vehicle. This is why no one wants them. In the USA and Canada generally only the wealthy are buying EV’s because they are simply not practical for the average person and in cold weather they are useless.

  2. Liardet Guy says:
    5 months ago

    Addionally to the usual string of disadvantages of EVs is the appalling depreciation rate and the refusal of garages to take them on part exchange.

  3. Spurwing Plover says:
    5 months ago

    I have seen EV Recharge Stations and their hardly ever used its just like Rotory Club setting up Bike Racks and their Never used Liberal Ideas are based upon Politics and their own stupid narrow minded Ideas based upon their Pipe-Dreams

Stay Connected On Social Media

gab-logo

Donate Today

Beating back the alarmist narrative takes time and money. Please donate today to help!

Recent Posts

  • german wind farmHow Wind And Solar Sent Energy Prices Sky-High in ‘Green’ Countries
    May 8, 2025
    Adding more green energy makes power more expensive, not cheaper—due to unreliable output, required fossil fuel backup, and taxpayer subsidies. […]
  • bernie sanders fox newsBernie Sanders Defends Private Jet Use, Says ‘He’s Too Important’ To Fly Coach
    May 8, 2025
    Bernie Sanders and AOC are facing criticism for using private jets while promoting their climate-focused “Fighting Oligarchy” tour. […]
  • blackout stationGreen Energy Suicide: The West Pays The Price For Its Net-Zero Delusions
    May 8, 2025
    Green energy policies clash with reality as Europe and the U.S. face blackouts, soaring costs, and a collapsing power grid. […]
  • wright trump exec orderDOE Scraps $4.5M Website And Logo Project Meant To Showcase Green Agenda
    May 8, 2025
    The DOE canceled a $4.5 million contract the Biden admin awarded for a new agency website and logo that highlighted the green energy transition. […]
  • desantis bill signing‘Dead On Arrival’: DeSantis Signs Law Banning Geoengineering And Weather Modification In Florida
    May 7, 2025
    DeSantis has signed legislation shutting down geoengineering and weather modification projects in Florida amid rising voter concerns. […]
  • columbia protestersNo Worthwhile Research Was Lost In The Columbia Funding Cuts
    May 7, 2025
    Columbia University laid off 180 people after Trump ended grants for leftist equity and global warming research. […]
  • tree ringsHow Activists And Flawed Data Created The Illusion Of A Climate Apocalypse
    May 7, 2025
    Activist-made climate graphic misuses smoothed proxy data to exaggerate modern warming, with IPCC silence fueling ongoing alarmism and misinformation. […]
  • polar bear clappingTwo New Studies Reveal Shocking Polar Ice Gains, Upend Climate Narrative
    May 7, 2025
    Two new studies reveal unexpected polar ice trends, challenging climate assumptions and highlighting the need for pragmatic energy policy. […]
  • offshore wind farmBlue States Sue After Trump Halts ‘Green’ Projects, Seek To Revive Biden’s Wind Subsidies
    May 7, 2025
    Trump halts offshore wind leases, triggering lawsuits from 17 blue states trying to rescue Biden-era green-energy graft from the chopping block. […]
  • chris wright‘Absolute Silliness’: DOE Delays Biden-Era Fossil Fuel Ban In Federal Buildings
    May 6, 2025
    The DOE is postponing a Biden-era rule that would limit fossil fuel use in federal buildings, aligning with Trump's energy priorities. […]

Get Instant Email Notifications

Enter your email address to receive notifications of new posts by email either instantly or daily. Check your Junk folder for any verification emails upon subscribing.

Submit a tip

Please enter your email, so we know you're human.

Books We Like

very convenient warming

exposing great lie

Have a suggestion? Let us know! We swap out books based on your input. We participate in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. See here.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us

© Portions copyright Climate Change Dispatch

Share via
  • Threads
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Mastodon
  • Buffer
  • Telegram
  • Email
  • Copy Link
  • Share Using More Networks…
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us

© 2025 Climate Change Dispatch