• Privacy Policy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
Climate Change Dispatch
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
Climate Change Dispatch
No Result
View All Result

Here’s What’s In The Dems’ Green-Pork Dumpster-Fire Spending Bill

by Spencer Brown
August 09, 2022, 8:33 AM
in News and Opinion
Reading Time: 4 mins read
A A
6

manchin senateThe folks at the Republican Study Committee (RSC) — led by Rep. Jim Banks (R-IN) — often read the hellish hundreds of pages that constitute the Democrats’ legislative agenda and summarize the worst of the worst provisions.

They just released an updated review of Senate Democrats’ so-called “Inflation Reduction Act” (which, spoiler alert, won’t reduce inflation) as it was passed following an overnight session this weekend. [bold, links added]

RSC’s memo on the legislation — supposedly crafted to help Americans — found more than 50 insane and inane policies.

In no particular order, here are some of the ridiculous things that are part of the bill sold as helping Americans struggling under Biden and his party’s flawed policies.

Nearly $370 billion worth of taxpayer dollars to fund “green” energy projects — passed without any significant restrictions to keep the funds from enriching the Chinese Communist Party (China owns 80 percent of the natural resources needed to make “green” products) while they continue their Uyghur genocide.

Sixty billion dollars in corporate welfare to “green” companies — a Solyndra scandal on steroids in the making.

As Townhall often highlights, the pain created by the Biden administration’s war on energy is the point.

Rather than helping Americans by investing in safe and reliable energy that’s cheap and proven, Democrats are giving tax credits to “green” companies while forcing Americans to join Biden’s quixotic “transition” to alternative energy and paying higher taxes on top of the higher costs just to be “green.”

Three billion dollars for the Department of Transportation to look into racist infrastructure. There are just…no words.

Tax breaks for wealthy liberals to install “green” energy solutions — and paid for by [low- to middle-income American taxpayers.]

The programs will incentivize the purchase and use of more energy-efficient appliances and the installation of solar panels or wind turbines.

There are also provisions for taxpayers to subsidize electric vehicles for wealthy Americans — making up to $300,000 per year — for a program that’s seen 78 percent of such subsidies end up claimed by those with an income greater than $100,000 per year.

These programs are a boon for wealthy Americans and again, the “transition” is paid for at the expense of painful tax increases for families with smaller incomes.

Is that the “environmental justice” the left keeps talking about?

Increased energy costs for Americans — because again, the pain is the point.

By raising excise taxes on oil and petroleum, Democrats just tacked another $12 billion tax increase on fossil fuels and the permanent extension of coal taxes — two more costs that will end up being passed on to consumers, another violation of President Biden’s promise that Americans making less than $400,000 annually wouldn’t pay “a penny more” in taxes.

Funding for the Agriculture Department to prioritize grants for cattle feed that will “reduce enteric methane emissions from ruminant” or, in common terms, money to subsidize food for cows that won’t make them fart as much, again all paid for by taxpayers.

$1.5 billion for trees in cities. Because liberal dystopias don’t already have enough tree huggers running around building community gardens with their own money, now Democrats are forcing taxpayers everywhere to make sure the Democrat hellholes have nice trees for criminals to do drugs behind or use for cover when shootings take place.

$87 million to “educate” Americans on the importance of reducing emissions — all while Biden’s climate czar John Kerry jets around the globe to attend climate conferences and the president and the first lady fly to one of their multiple homes or vacation spots amid a recession and 40-year inflation.

$500 million for the Department of Homeland Security — not to secure the U.S.-Mexico border or do a better at stopping individuals on terrorist watch lists from being released into the United States, but to fund “sustainability and environmental programs.”

$3 billion for new “green” USPS mail trucks — which will definitely not do anything to improve the timeliness or quality of the dumpster fire/money pit that has become the United States Postal Service.

The above are just a handful of the nonsensical provisions Senate Democrats signed off on over the weekend in a piece of legislation that was named about as inaccurately as humanly possible.

Amid soaring inflation, a recession, and increasing credit card debt held by Americans who are struggling to make ends meet and living paycheck to paycheck, these are Democrats’ priorities as laid out less than 99 days before the midterms.

The poor timing of the radical legislation is seemingly not lost on some Democrats in the House of Representatives.

Rep. Vicente Gonzalez (D-TX) said “there are still some concerning provisions” in the falsely named legislation, while his fellow Texas Democrat Henry Cuellar said his “priority is ensuring this bill would not raise energy prices or hinder American energy jobs at such a critical time” — suggesting the bill doesn’t pass his litmus test.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi will bring the bill to her chamber for a vote as early as Friday, at which point a lot of vulnerable Democrats are going to be in the hot seat when it comes to deciding how to vote on the legislation.

Read more at Townhall

  • Truth
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Gettr
  • Threads
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Mastodon
  • Buffer
  • Telegram
  • Email
  • Copy Link
  • Share Using More Networks…

Popular Posts

Electric Vehicles (EVs)

The ‘Green’ Scam Of The Century: How ‘Renewables’ Increase Fossil Fuel Demands

Oct 23, 2024
News and Opinion

Antarctica Is Colder, Icier Today Than At Any Time In 5,000 Years

Apr 15, 2024
Energy

30-Plus Signs That The Climate Scam Is Collapsing

Apr 09, 2025

Comments 6

  1. David Lewis says:
    3 years ago

    I will comment on the part of the bill “$3 billion for new “green” USPS mail trucks.” Let’s assume the post office is smart enough to only use these trucks in locations where adequate charging stations exist. That might be excessively optimistic. Unless the trucks can do their entire route on one charge, which is unlikely, the mail carrier will have to charge it. That is 40 minutes of extra time if only one charge is needed. Either the carriers will have to be paid over time, or the post office will have to add additional carriers and trucks. If there is a power outage, the trucks would be stranded. The postal carrier would then have to be compensated for a lot of extra time and the truck might not return to the post office until the power was restored.

    Reply
  2. Sonnyhill says:
    3 years ago

    How much longer will we keep our trust in fiat currency? The abuse of the American dollar, the wild exploitation of credit markets, the bad monetary policy that has revived inflation to levels last seen 40 years ago. Pity the seniors who watch helplessly as their savings get decimated. High interest rates will reduce inflation, not the Democrats. But watch them claim that this bill did the job, and the MSM will agree.

    Reply
  3. Spurwing Plover says:
    3 years ago

    The Citizens Against Government Waste(Citizens Against Government Waste(CAGW) are realy going to fill up its Pig Book with this load of Democrat Pork

    Reply
  4. Randy Verret says:
    3 years ago

    I’d be shocked in enough moderate Democrat’s “pop up” to stall this misguided legislation. As for energy, all this is doing is making it more difficult to produce affordable & reliable energy & distorting markets towards inefficient & expensive alternatives that will not reduce emissions as advertised. I openly defy anyone to refute that statement. The voters better not get “suckered” in November. We need to pump the brakes on this “clown car” before this gets any further out of control…

    Reply

Comments are welcome! Those that add no discussion value may be removed.Cancel reply

Stay Connected On Social Media

gab-logo

Donate Today

Beating back the alarmist narrative takes time and money. Please donate today to help!

Recent Posts

  • oil rig drillAmerica’s Energy Boom Exposes The Folly Of Britain’s Net Zero Disaster
    Oct 3, 2025
    America’s energy boom and policy flexibility are widening the economic gap with Britain, where high prices and net zero goals are stalling growth. […]
  • Arctic sunsetNew Study Shows Arctic Sea Ice Decline Slowing, Driven More by Natural Variability Than Emissions
    Oct 3, 2025
    New study shows Arctic sea ice decline has slowed since 2012, driven more by natural variability than greenhouse gas emissions. […]
  • Attorney General Rob BontaNewsom Backs Off Climate Fight As AG Bonta Doubles Down On Suing Energy Firms
    Oct 3, 2025
    Two years after launching a high-profile climate lawsuit, Newsom is backing off while AG Rob Bonta doubles down on lawfare against major energy firms. […]
  • Farm irrigationMeteorologist Debunks Reuters’ Claim That Climate Change Threatens Europe’s Resources
    Oct 2, 2025
    Data show Europe’s droughts, weather, and biodiversity issues stem from mismanagement, not climate change, despite alarmist media claims. […]
  • Russ VoughtTrump Nixes $8B In ‘Green New Scam Funding’ In NYC, Blue States
    Oct 2, 2025
    Trump DOE halted billions in green energy projects citing poor economics, DEI hiring, and weak energy impact, sparking backlash in blue states. […]
  • SherrillRising Energy Costs And Dem Green Policies Top Of Mind In NJ Gubernatorial Race
    Oct 2, 2025
    New Jersey voters face rising energy costs as Democratic green policies and offshore wind expansion drive utility bills higher. […]
  • Hochul's green stringsHochul’s Election-Year ‘Inflation Refund’ Checks Can’t Cover Costs Of Her Green Agenda
    Oct 2, 2025
    Hochul’s election-year ‘inflation refund’ checks won’t offset the soaring living costs and utility hikes her green-energy agenda created. […]
  • South Asia monsoonSouth Asia Monsoons Not Becoming More Dangerous From Climate Change, Data Confirms
    Oct 1, 2025
    Claims that climate change is making South Asia’s monsoons more extreme ignore history, data, and other major causes of flooding. […]
  • wildfire carsRick Scott Wants Answers On What California Did With Federal Wildfire Funds
    Oct 1, 2025
    Sen. Rick Scott is demanding answers on how California spent federal money earmarked for preventing and fighting wildfires. […]
  • Biden test driving an all-electric Ford F-150.Ford CEO Warns U.S. EV Sales Could Halve After Federal Subsidies End
    Oct 1, 2025
    Ford warns U.S. electric vehicle sales could drop as much as 5% after the $7,500 taxpayer-funded federal subsidies expire in a month. […]

Get Instant Email Notifications

Subscribe to receive a digest of daily stories, or get emailed once they're published. Check your Junk/Spam folder for a verification email.

Submit a tip

Please enter your email, so we know you're human.

Books You May Like

very convenient warming

exposing great lie

Have a suggestion? Let us know! We swap out books based on your input. We participate in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. See here.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us

© Portions copyright Climate Change Dispatch

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us

© 2025 Climate Change Dispatch

Share via
  • Facebook
  • Like
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Digg
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky
Share via
  • Digg
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky