The New York Times (@NYTimes) is very angry that the U.S. has been so successful, helpful and productive over the past 150 years.
Apparently, the New York Times prefers the traditional Chinese model of low CO2 emissions, when millions of people starved to death every year for thousands of years.
15 Jun 1931, Page 6 – Montana Butte Standard at Newspapers.com
China’s CO2 emissions are skyrocketing now, people there aren’t starving anymore, and US emissions are going down.
But facts don’t matter to the New York Times. It is all about hating America.
Read more at Real Climate Science
Unfortunately I’m old enough to report that hating America preceded the climate fraud by decades. This includes Americans hating America. From listening to these people my best guess is that they feel guilty for our success. This is of course ridiculous. No one should feel guilty for being rewarded for hard work.
I believe that the effort to weaken America increased after the collapse of the Soviet Union. Democrats elected a president who was willing to work against Uncle Sam from the inside.
To the New York Slimes(All the Sludge thats Fit to Print)its CHINA not AMERICA thats the worlds #1 polluter yes check the dragons carbon emissions thats far more then the Eagles but you NYT’s scum suckers just want to praise China becuase they mostly ride bicycles and their farmers use foot pumps i have my doupts that you and the New York Slimes will ever print the truth your too busy pushing a leftists agenda for Big Mean Green Brother
Getting people to believe that CO2 or carbon (which is not CO2) is a pollutant is one of the most astounding instances of mass deception in world history.
If any leftist you know happens to attempt suicide by swallowing barbiturates, you may be able to save their life by forcing them to ingest the horrific, evil and deadly pollutant https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Activated_carbon .
Scary global warming preachers are predictably feigning outrage over President Trump pulling out of an incredibly stupid unenforceable pledge . Where were the same massive hypocrites when in 1997 Senators voted in favour of the Byrd -Hagel Resolution 95-0 that opposed the Kyoto Protocol and any such agreement that
were inequitable to USA interests . …. as the Paris Pledge is . in fact despite being completely unenforceable and voluntary the Paris Pledge was far far worse . It included the transfer of hundreds of $Billions out of the pockets of USA citizens to be given away to some of the biggest low life’s on earth . Too cowardly to even attempt to get it approved Obama / Kerry slid the tax payer rip off through on the basis of an Executive order . Deceit and betrayal of the democratic process which is apparently just fine
with most of the chimps that work in the MSM .
The Byrd -Hagel Resolution was supported by people like Boxer D , Kerry D , Kennedy D , Rockefeller D , and McCain R .
The moral outrage now is pathetic . At least in 1995 they put the USA citizens interests ahead of political whining.
Someone really needs to tell Arnie the difference between CO and CO2 . How about if the rest of the world all started smoking big stogies ? Ghandi and Mother Theresa were credible because they lived the way they talked unlike the climate hustlers .
Why not add up the “carbon footprint” of Global Warming preachers like Gore , Steyer , Dicaprio , Suzuki and the Pope , take the average and multiply it by the worlds population . NOW THAT WOULD BE A PROBLEM . Hypocrites should shut it.
The debate is over .
Just how many trees are cut down to produce these liberal leftists rag the NEW YORK SLIMES(All the sludge that’s fit to print)just so they can print lies,leftists propeganda and the mindless blabbering from mindless Columists and Chief Editors
The NYT is one of the biggest forest killers on the planet . All for a product with about
15 minutes of shelf life . Yea throw rocks hypocrites .
The worlds largest junk mail wrapper needs to show some leadership and shut down .
The Times is ignoring two facts (and they are facts) 1) CO2 does NOT cause global warming (never has –never will) and 2) The Paris agreement has nothing to do with climate. It’s about redistribution of (American ) wealth and the destruction of (American) capitalism (or so says the UN’s Christina Figueres). The UN is trying to establish a world-wide Socialist economy under their central planning domination and are using fraudulent “climate change” as a means to do so. It’s hard to tell if the New York Times is a knowing part of this plot or an ignorant dupe that believes their propaganda.
In either case, it’s best that we just laugh at their intransigence and ignore them.
Apparently, for some people, the understanding of climate change is limited to the discovery that CO2 is a ghg. The fact that CO2 is a ghg just scratches the surface.
Delve deeper into the science and discover that thermalization and the Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution of molecule energy among gas molecules explain why CO2 does not now, has never had and will never have a significant effect on climate.
So how many still read the New York Slimes(All the Sludge that’s Fit to Print)and its band of idiot reporters,comulmits and writters and idiot editorial cartoons this liberal rag has become the east coast version of PRAVDA in the west these the Sacamento Bee,San Fransico Chronical and L.A. Slimes