Critics of the offshore wind industry are calling on President-elect Donald Trump to keep his campaign promise of ending federal support for offshore wind on his first day in office. [emphasis, links added]
Trump’s return to the Oval Office may deal the problem-riddled offshore wind industry another blow if his administration follows through on his pledge to scrap federal support for offshore wind projects during his second term.
Republican lawmakers, opposed to heavily subsidized green energy, and commercial fishermen, who view the industry as an existential threat to their livelihoods, are calling on the president-elect to follow through on his campaign’s promise, which could imply ending federal subsidies and lease sales for the industry.
“We are going to make sure that [offshore wind] ends on day one. I’m gonna write it out in an executive order,” Trump told a crowd of his supporters at a campaign rally in Wildwood, New Jersey, on May 11. “It’s gonna end on day one.”
Since January 2021, the Biden-Harris administration has approved ten offshore wind projects at commercial scale and conducted six offshore wind lease sales, including one held just last week in the Gulf of Maine that was criticized by the commercial fishing industry as part of President Joe Biden’s wider climate agenda.
Offshore wind has notably suffered from inflation headwinds, project cancellations, and souring public opinion despite the Biden administration’s embrace of the industry.
“I have no doubt that a second Trump administration will do the right thing for Americans by scrapping the Biden-Harris offshore wind agenda,” Republican New Jersey Rep. Jeff Van Drew, a vocal critic of the offshore wind industry, told the DCNF.
“These projects are a burden on our economy, harm local communities, and are nothing but a political payoff to special interests. President Trump understands that true energy independence and prosperity come from American oil, gas, solar, and especially nuclear energy through a balanced energy policy — not from wasteful wind projects that put our economy and environment at risk.”
“I think it’s a very wise decision,” Republican Maryland Rep. Andy Harris, chairman of the House Freedom Caucus, told the DCNF. “We are wasting money, and the worst part is that all that money is going to foreign wind companies because there are no American wind companies. They’re all foreign companies that are making billions of dollars off the American energy ratepayer.”
The Vineyard Wind energy project, jointly owned by a Danish investment firm and a Spanish utility, earned Republican lawmakers’ ire in July when debris from one of the project’s turbine blades — which stretches longer than the Statue of Liberty — washed up on Massachusetts’ beaches after breaking apart and falling into the ocean.
Offshore wind industrialization comes at a heavy cost to our marine life and environment, and is an incredibly expensive way to generate electricity.
We should never allow foreign owned companies to control our energy supply—much less harm our environment while doing it. https://t.co/xwl6rWXmY4
— Rep. Andy Harris, MD (@RepAndyHarrisMD) July 30, 2024
“We should never allow foreign-owned companies to control our energy supply — much less harm our environment while doing it,” Harris wrote on X.
The New England Fisherman’s Stewardship Association (NEFSA), a commercial fishing industry group that organized a “flotilla protest” at the site of the broken Vineyard Wind turbine in August is calling on the Trump administration to walk back on Biden’s goal of deploying 30 gigawatts of offshore wind by 2030.
The group is also advocating for the incoming Trump administration to “delist unleased wind energy areas” off the coast of New England and the mid-Atlantic.
NEFSA CEO Jerry Leeman told the DCNF that he’s optimistic that the Trump administration will be “a voice of reason” on offshore wind, which he claimed would be a welcome departure from the previous administration, whom he accused of prioritizing green energy goals over fishermen’s livelihoods and the health of the marine environment.
“The incoming administration has a historic opportunity to save American workers from foreign developers, reinvigorate iconic coastal towns, and improve America’s food security,” NEFSA CEO Jerry Leeman said in a press release following Trump’s election win.
Read rest at Daily Caller
Today is the first day of COP 29, the big once a year conference on climate change. There was unprecedented action today in that for the first time a major agreement was made on day one. This was the acceptance of rules on carbon trading. The main goal of COP 29 was finance. There is a goal to transfer hundreds of billion dollars a year from nations that have earned what they have to those that have not. The plan was for the US and EU to pressure China to start contributing to the green climate fund. They also planned to get the petroleum nations to do so. Now that after the election it is obvious that the US will not be contributing, these goals have been abandoned. One concern that some countries will follow the US lead and also may not contribute or will scale back what they do.
Early next year countries are suppose to submit new and stricter targets to reduce emissions, called Nationally Determined Contributions. Only a small number of nations with small economies have met their current promised reductions. Yet, every country is expected to commit to and meet more ambitious targets. The concern is with the US as a non-player, many countries will submit less ambitious targets.
Climate change advocates are always lying telling us that renewable energy is cheaper than fossil fuels. It is clear that those at COP 29 know better. One concern is that the US, with less of the expensive renewable energy, will be able to compete better against economies with a high mix of such energy.
Cut off all funding for Offshore Wind Turbines quit wasting our taxes to appease the Eco-Freaks and get back to some Common Sense