Climate alarmists insist that an increase of one degree in the average global temperatures is a signal that the end of civilization is near.
Every day a new revelation: more fires in California, snow in Antarctica is turning green, salmon are dying in Alaska – all attributed to rising temperatures.
The first question an inquiring mind would ask is, does the Earth maintain the same average temperature over millennia and how does it accomplish that task?
The answer is that it doesn’t.
Civilization began because of global warming.
About 6,000 years ago, according to experts, hunter-gatherers were driven from the higher lands because rising temperatures brought drought, loss of plants and animals, and famine.
They moved to river valleys in three or four places around the globe, most notably the Nile River.
There they had water and the water also provided food. But planting by hand did not suffice.
Someone devised the plow.
It was the “trigger” that led to a series of technological inventions and discoveries and brought about civilization, according to the book Connections, by James Burke, which also became a highly popular TV series in 1978.
Plowed fields meant surplus crops, and planning for the harvest and storage included preparing for the annual Nile floods, which brought about math, writing and cloth clothing, and a series of events subsequently that Burke linked to the 1965 electrical shutdown in Northeast America.
All because the Earth’s temperature had increased 6,000 years ago.
Has the global temperature remained the same every year since then? Climate alarmists admit it has not but say it has risen about one degree since 1850, which they say is way too fast.
It will mean crops can’t be grown in some places where they now flourish.
But won’t they grow in places where it has been too cold?
Those who predict the end of civilization by the very mechanism that brought about civilization still have a lot of explaining to do if they expect people to give up their freedom and wealth to a global government that promises to control the climate that experts admit they don’t fully understand.
Read more at American Thinker
One of the biggst deceptions in history since the Trojan Horse
It is called “politics”. And computer modelling, always prone to error and what is put in first. HAs anybody ever proves beyond all doubt that CO2, which is part of Earth’s makeup, does actually cause temperatures to rise? if som step forward with total proof. And if so does it not mean it has always caused temperatures to rise, simply because it is there and the heat cannot (they say) escape? Why did Arrhenius change his estimated figures from 5c to maximum 2c? Why did he say it would be good? (Cold Swedish winters?). Why do most plants grow better with warmth and more CO2 if it is so bad?
The simple record of the short interglacial and the recent Million years of ice age cycles shows a cyclic change of range 2 degrees every thousand years throughout, made up to three main combined cycles, and clearly observed in the ice core records, not guessed in models. The current peak is on track and cooler in fact than the Mediaeval, Roman and Minoan peaks, and also within the historic range and rate. The last interglacial was 4 degrees warmer than this. So how is this unusual or abnormal?
Temperatures now are near or at the maximum before the next cooling phase. Attributing this natural change to a tiny effect from CO2 that modellers cannot actually prove, and whose models predictions are shown to be many times higher than those actually observed by satellite observations, suggests nothing unusual is happening to the climate in this short section of a warming phase of natural interglacial variability. Blaming natural change on humans supports some great rackets and control over how people advance civilisation and their own lives, though.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/e1n7oivlcpylkh4/Interglacial%20Temperature%20Observations%20BRL%20CATT.jpg?dl=0
Back in the 1970’s it was Global Cooling and a new Ice Age was coming that liberal rag TIME had it on their front pages or their liberal Magazine which proves Time Magazine like all liberal Magazines Lies to their Readers who still read their liberal rag
Yeah, we all know