• Privacy Policy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
Climate Change Dispatch
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
Climate Change Dispatch
No Result
View All Result

Global Cooling May Be Our Bitter-Cold Reality

by Ronald Stein
February 24, 2020, 9:57 AM
in News and Opinion
Reading Time: 4 mins read
A A
6

earth arctic viewTrying to imply that cooling is right around the corner when we’re watching record-breaking warm ocean temperatures to me seems a big stretch. But current facts and the history around the five previous Ice Ages that came and melted before fossil fuels became recognizable words may be worthy of review.

The real climate crisis may not be global warming, but global cooling, and it may have already started.

These events may not be an anomaly, but a predecessor of things to come:

  • Planting was one month late due to cold spring weather across the Great Plains of North America in both 2018 and 2019.
  • In 2019 Spring was wet and cold and ~40% of the huge USA corn crop was not planted.
  • Summer 2019 was cold, and snow came early in the Fall, and the crop was a failure across much of the Great Plains.
  • There were good harvests in the USA Southeast and South in 2019, and lots of grain in storage so prices did not escalate – but there were big crop losses across the Great Plains. Also, lots of that grain will be feed grade only, if they do get it off the fields.

The sun activity which is not controlled by humanity or by social media may be formulating a different forecast for the world.

Even NASA has imagined a “Little Ice Age” in the future, because of solar activity that rises and falls in 11-year cycles; and the newest one begins this year, 2020.

Cool temperatures shorten growing seasons. Cool temperatures also reduce evaporation from the seas, resulting in less precipitation over land.

The result is fewer months to grow crops, colder temperatures during the growing season, and less rainfall to hydrate the crops. Crop failures and famine predictably follow.

By contrast, warmer temperatures lengthen growing seasons, facilitate more oceanic evaporation, and produce more vital rainfall to hydrate crops. Climate “change” doesn’t destroy crop production, climate cooling does.

And, the prospect is the possibility and consequences of impending lower global food production, as crops fail during the coming years, along with the potential for major increases in weather-related deaths around the world.

Neither humans nor fossil fuels were present during the five warming cycles that melted the icebergs of the five previous Ice Ages. Also, it should be noted, only 12 percent of the Earth’s surface is habitable by humans.

Humans have been monitoring temperatures since we’ve had meteorologists, which is about the last 150 years.

On a 24-hour clock, those 150 years in which we’ve been monitoring temperatures (out of the 4.5 billion earth has been around) represent 0.00288 of a second!

Without the existence of human beings or fossil fuels to blame for the previous five Ice Ages, and the warming cycles that melted the ice, we are left with a troublesome question.

  • Namely, how can the presence of humans and fossil fuels, for “0.00288 of a second” on the “24-hour clock,” on the 12 percent of the Earth’s surface that is habitable landmass have any influence, as compared to all the natural forces that have caused the five previous warming cycles and climate changes over the last 4.5 billion years?

If we believe that solar activity is the main driver of surface temperature rather than CO2, we may begin the next cooling period within the next decade.

The sun may be dimming, temporarily, but don’t panic; Earth is not going to freeze over. But will the resulting cooling put a dent in the global warming trend?

Solar cooling may have already started. Sunspot activity is at a low ebb and there is considerable discussion on what effects that may have or is having on Earth’s climate.

A periodic solar event called a “grand minimum” could overtake the sun perhaps beginning as soon as 2020 and lasting through 2070, resulting in diminished magnetism, infrequent sunspot production and less ultraviolet (UV) radiation reaching Earth —all bringing a cooler period to the planet that may span 50 years.

The last grand-minimum event — a disruption of the sun’s 11-year cycle of variable sunspot activity — happened in the mid-17th century.

Known as the Maunder Minimum, it occurred between 1645 and 1715, during a longer span of time when parts of the world became so cold that the period was called the Little Ice Age, which lasted from about 1300 to 1850.

Fortunately, when the Little Ice Age ended a little more than a century ago, the planet began an overall warming trend no thanks to any Green New Deal at the time, but by nature itself.

Crop production once again increased, famines became rarer, extreme weather events became less frequent and severe, and human health and welfare dramatically improved.

Spending trillions of dollars in the hope that temperatures do not warm by an average of one or two degrees in the next eight decades due to computer climate models reflecting carbon emission reductions by diminishing fossil fuel use.

Even if the USA could BUY a zero-carbon footprint, it’s the billions in China and India that have more than 5,000 coal-fired power plants and building 600 more to provide their populations with electricity, that will continue to increase emissions.

Would anyone notice a temperature change of one or two degrees? In California, we normally experience a temperature change of 30 degrees in just one day, from the morning overcast to the afternoons blue sky and sunshine.

Forty years ago, it was global cooling, today its global warming. What will it be tomorrow? The New York Times wrote about global cooling and scientific consensus in 1974-75.

Climate alarmists have been producing this false narrative of how the-world-is- going-to-end-nonsense for over 140 years and are now predicting the end of the world within the next decade or so due to global warming, while the sun’s activities may be a prelude to another cooling cycle for the world.

While you’re reading all the human-controlled social media messages about the upcoming demise of the world due to temperature increases resulting from emissions, the sun, which is not influenced by social media or humanity, may be formulating a different forecast for the world.

Read more at CFACT

  • Truth
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Gettr
  • Threads
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Mastodon
  • Buffer
  • Telegram
  • Email
  • Copy Link
  • Share Using More Networks…

Popular Posts

Electric Vehicles (EVs)

The ‘Green’ Scam Of The Century: How ‘Renewables’ Increase Fossil Fuel Demands

Oct 23, 2024
News and Opinion

Antarctica Is Colder, Icier Today Than At Any Time In 5,000 Years

Apr 15, 2024
Energy

30-Plus Signs That The Climate Scam Is Collapsing

Apr 09, 2025

Comments 6

  1. Spurwing Plover says:
    6 years ago

    There’s one from IN SEARCH OF that tells on a possible new Ice Age and it tells of the harsh winter of 76\77 and Fourtyfour consecutive days of Snow in Buffalo N.Y.

    • Dave O says:
      6 years ago

      Yes!! That’s what the Greenies want! Bitter cold winters and famine to starve off the human parasites that cause irreparable damage to their true god, mother earth.

  2. Roger Payne says:
    6 years ago

    The Little Ice Age was preceded by, and involved many of the weather and climate patterns we see today: wild storms, extreme flooding, sometimes blazing hot summers, bitter winters, wild disturbances and uneven northern hemisphere patterns. wild swings of the NAO, etc. The sun cycles had settled into a low phase. NASA gas said such a low phase may have started: cycle 25 forecast to be lower still.

  3. David Cameron says:
    6 years ago

    I think the article is totally wrong. LIke the rest of the world I’ve decided to put all my faith in Greta Thunberg and kill myself in 11 years before evryone else dies in 12 years.

  4. Gerry says:
    6 years ago

    “Even if the USA could BUY a zero-carbon footprint”,

    even if China could BUY a zero-carbon footprint,

    even if China could BUY a zero-carbon footprint,

    even if the EARTH’s entire human population could BUY a zero-carbon footprint,

    achieving a zero-carbon footprint still has ZERO relevance or bases in fact to climate change, global temperatures or science of any kind.

    THE “zero-carbon footprint” is a political based adgenda… period.

  5. Spurwing Plover says:
    6 years ago

    I would like to see the look on the faces of the Global Warming screwballs aboard their research ships trapped in the Arctic ice

Stay Connected On Social Media

gab-logo

Donate Today

Beating back the alarmist narrative takes time and money. Please donate today to help!

Recent Posts

  • Gavin Newsom Sao PaoloNewsom Accuses Trump Of Giving Brazil The ‘Middle Finger’ With Tariffs, Skipping COP30
    Nov 11, 2025
    Newsom blasted Trump for slapping tariffs on Brazil over human rights abuses and skipping COP30, calling it a diplomatic ‘middle finger.’ […]
  • Belem shanty by the riverCOP30 In Belém Exposes Climate Elites’ Rank Hypocrisy
    Nov 11, 2025
    Belém faces raw sewage and poor sanitation as COP30 delegates lecture on emissions, ignoring actual eco-crises harming millions today. […]
  • Pres. Lula COP30Brazil’s Lula Calls For Climate Truth At COP30, But Facts Tell A Different Story
    Nov 11, 2025
    Lula vowed truth would save the planet at Brazil COP30, but the facts on Net Zero and the Paris Agreement tell a harsher story. […]
  • Hurricane winds key west2025 Hurricane Forecast Was Overly Alarmist (Again)… Atlantic Season Ending Near Normal
    Nov 10, 2025
    NOAA’s 2025 hurricane forecast hyped an active season, but storm activity is ending up close to average. […]
  • protest global warningAs The Left Tunes Out Climate Change, Democrats Push Costly Green Energy
    Nov 10, 2025
    As the Left tunes out climate change, Dems pivot to costly green energy framed around affordability. […]
  • COP30Climate Doom Patrol: COP30 Opens In Brazil As Top Emitters Skip Summit
    Nov 10, 2025
    COP30 kicks off in Brazil as top emitters skip, and the Amazon is cleared for a summit road that goes nowhere. […]
  • BBC headquartersBBC Launches Investigation Into Bias Of Its Climate Change Coverage
    Nov 10, 2025
    The BBC will investigate its climate change coverage as the broadcaster faces a mounting credibility crisis. […]
  • lana iiiLula’s Diesel-Guzzling Hotel Boat Heads To COP30 Climate Summit
    Nov 7, 2025
    Brazilian President Lula’s hotel boat will burn 4,000 liters of diesel to attend COP30, highlighting climate hypocrisy. […]
  • Queasy cowUdder Chaos: Cows Collapse After Eating Danish Gov’t’s Methane-Lowering Feed
    Nov 7, 2025
    Danish cows are collapsing after the gov’t pushes methane-lowering, greenie-drugged feed, sparking outrage among farmers. […]
  • GreenlandNew Study: Greenland Ice Melt Still Defies Alarmist Warming Claims
    Nov 7, 2025
    New study finds Greenland has had almost no net warming over the past century, challenging alarmist climate claims of rapid ice melt and sea level rise. […]

Get Instant Email Notifications

Subscribe to receive a digest of daily stories, or get emailed once they're published. Check your Junk/Spam folder for a verification email.

Submit a tip

Please enter your email, so we know you're human.

Books You May Like

exposing great lie

Have a suggestion? Let us know! We swap out books based on your input. We participate in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. See here.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us

© Portions copyright Climate Change Dispatch

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us

© 2025 Climate Change Dispatch

 
Share via
  • Facebook
  • Like
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Digg
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky
Share via
  • Digg
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky