• Privacy Policy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
Climate Change Dispatch
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
Climate Change Dispatch
No Result
View All Result

Germany’s Green Energy Transition (Energiewende) On The Ropes

by Alex Alexiev
May 16, 2019, 8:49 AM
in News and Opinion
Reading Time: 3 mins read
A A
3

wind turbines fireFor at least three years I have been saying that German energy policy, known as the Energiewende (Energy Transition), is doomed to fail sooner or later.

Not so the German mainstream press, which much like that of America, is firmly in the hands of leftists who have been religiously singing the praises of the Energiewende as a model for all humanity to follow.

First and foremost has been the popular weekly, Der Spiegel, that has also profiled itself as viciously anti-American to the point of making up fake news to paint America as evil incarnate (Claas Relotius).

Imagine my surprise when on a flight from Washington to Vienna, the flight attendant handed me a copy of Der Spiegel with the title story proclaiming loudly that the Energiewende has been “Botched in Germany”(Murks in Germany).

As if to make sure that the message is not lost, the title picture showcased broken wind turbines and hanging power lines on a dark Berlin skyline.

Had Spiegel finally come to its senses? No chance of that. The magazine continues to argue that the Energiewende was a “great idea” destroyed by German “narrow-mindedness,” whatever that meant.

What nether Der Spiegel nor the vast coterie of German officialdom, starting with Chancellor Merkel, can afford to admit is that the Energiewende was from its very beginning the “dumbest energy policy in the world” as the Wall Street Journal editorial board recently called it, and should never have been tried, let alone at the scale as occurred in Germany.

What Merkel & Co also cannot admit is that the whole idea of building a reliable electric supply on unreliable renewable solar and wind sources is impossible, because there are times when the wind does not blow and the sun does not shine.

The Germans even coined a word for it, they call it Dunkelflaute (dark doldrums).  Germany had also outlawed clean nuclear power after Fukushima on the asinine assumption that it could get hit with a 9.0 earthquake and a giant tsunami, leaving no alternative short of coal-fired plants to guarantee base-load i.e. reliable electricity to the highly industrialized nation.

Here are some of the facts that forced Spiegel to write this story that can no longer remain hidden.

Nearly 20 years after the beginning of the Energiewende and colossal expenditures to subsidize renewable energy (160 billion Euros in the last five years alone) very little has been achieved.

And what has been achieved, says the story, is in “crass contradiction with the meager results” and “far distant from the self-announced targets.”

Of the needed 7,700 km new power lines, only 950 km exist and only 30 km was added in 2017. The vast majority of those (60.5%) are still in the planning stage and 16.1% are yet to be planned.

And it looks like things will almost certainly get worse. Spiegel admits that the 1.2 million photovoltaic installations and 30,000 wind turbines currently present were erected with the help of “gigantic sums of state money” and without them, the future looks bleak.

Already, curtailment of subsidies is wreaking havoc with new installations. In 2018, the 743 new turbines are 1,000 less than the year before and many renewables companies are shedding jobs or filing for bankruptcy.

Half of the 30,000 windmills were installed before 2004 and are rapidly approaching the end of their useful life. Most will be closed down.

And that is before we even look at the three other key anchors of the Energiewende that are yet to be touched: housing, industry, and traffic.

Moreover, the German people, who are now paying the highest electricity rates in Europe, (nearly three times those of the U.S., twice those of France) and are forced by the state to subsidize industry, are starting to resist.

There is scarcely a new project started “that is not fought over or objected to.” Earlier it took less than 40 months for a project to go online, now it is at least 60 months.

There is one final thing that Der Spiegel does not want to tell us. All those huge expenditures would not make an iota of difference in the world’s CO2 emissions as long as the greatest polluters, China and India, are allowed to continue spewing CO2 unimpeded. In other words, the Energiewende was in vain!

Read more at American Thinker

  • Truth
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Gettr
  • Threads
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Mastodon
  • Buffer
  • Telegram
  • Email
  • Copy Link
  • Share Using More Networks…

Popular Posts

Electric Vehicles (EVs)

The ‘Green’ Scam Of The Century: How ‘Renewables’ Increase Fossil Fuel Demands

Oct 23, 2024
News and Opinion

Antarctica Is Colder, Icier Today Than At Any Time In 5,000 Years

Apr 15, 2024
Energy

30-Plus Signs That The Climate Scam Is Collapsing

Apr 09, 2025

Comments 3

  1. Amber says:
    7 years ago

    How many people are dying prematurely as a result of the government sanctioned and promoted earth has a fever fraud ? 10,000 of thousands per year .

  2. David Lewis says:
    7 years ago

    All of the above is true, but the Democrats can do the Green New Deal right and make it work. At least that is what they think. Brian, do you really think that the Democrats understand physics, or have any desire to? The tragic thing is that in the United States the same mistakes made in Germany are likely to be repeated here at least in part, especially in some states. The middle class family will pay.

  3. Brian RL Catt CEng, CPhys says:
    7 years ago

    They don’t make a difference to Germany’s CO2 emissions, even if that did affect the climate. Total waste of money in fact. Ye cannae change the laws of physics, Captain. The so called renewable solutions, that aren’t renewable or solutions, defy those laws of physics, in particular as regards energy density and intermittency, and can never deliver what they promise on the simple engineering facts. Renewables are incapable of replacing fossil energy on the grid at the levels required 24/7, and unavoidably expensive to collect per KWh because of their weaknesses. Only much more intense and sustainable nuclear power can replace intense fossil energy sources. But the fraud of alternative reality is still making €Billions for insider subsidy farmers and their political enablers, by law. Never mind the climate, follow the money. https://www.dropbox.com/s/q9qesny4dzfg1is/Energiewende%20CO2%20Tweet%202017-01-24%20at%2011.52.12.png?dl=0

Stay Connected On Social Media

gab-logo

Donate Today

Beating back the alarmist narrative takes time and money. Please donate today to help!

Recent Posts

  • global temp measuringErased Heatwaves And Adjusted Data Underpin The Global Temperature Record
    Feb 4, 2026
    Claims of a climate crisis rest on the assumption that scientists have a precise understanding of global temperature, past and present. Do they? […]
  • africa river basinMedia Invokes Climate Bogeyman To Explain Africa’s Recurring Weather
    Feb 4, 2026
    Africa’s droughts and floods are recurring weather events, not proof of a climate shift, despite media claims to the contrary. […]
  • polar bears arcticBiologists Let Attenborough Push False Starvation Claims About Barents Sea Bears
    Feb 4, 2026
    A 2011 Frozen Planet episode warned of starving polar bears in the Barents Sea despite evidence they were healthy. […]
  • gavel earth lawsuitsState AGs Seek Investigation Of Alleged Climate Bias Influencing Federal Judges
    Feb 3, 2026
    Twenty-two state attorneys general urge the House to investigate alleged climate bias influencing federal judges. […]
  • computer screen modeling failureWhen Assumptions Replace Evidence In Climate Science
    Feb 3, 2026
    In its latest scientific manual for judges, the Federal Judicial Center promotes climate attribution methods over real-world testing. […]
  • mikie sherrillGreen Energy Policies Are Pushing NJ Electric Bills Into The Stratosphere
    Feb 3, 2026
    Green energy mandates and capacity shortfalls are driving NJ electric bills sharply higher, prompting an emergency response from the state’s new governor. […]
  • eu energy dogma‘Stupidity Of The Century’: Belgian PM Rips EU Green Energy Dogma
    Feb 3, 2026
    The Belgian prime minister calls EU green energy policy a costly failure, weakening reliability, affordability, and energy security. […]
  • jefferson memorial in winterMedia Promised ‘More Southern’ DC Winters—It’s Now Colder Than in 30 Years
    Feb 3, 2026
    ‘Climate change’ was supposed to make DC winters ‘more southern’—instead, it’s colder than it’s been in the past 30 years. […]
  • power lines nat gas plantPower Grid Watchdog Warns Wind And Solar Overreliance Raises Winter Blackout Risk
    Feb 3, 2026
    Grid watchdog warns winter blackouts are becoming more likely as electricity demand rises and coal and natural gas power plants retire. […]
  • highway 1 collapseClimate Change Isn’t Breaking Highway 1 – Nature And Bad Siting Are
    Feb 2, 2026
    Highway 1 damage reflects natural erosion and poor siting, not worsening storms or climate change, despite LA Times claims. […]

Get Instant Email Notifications

Subscribe to receive a digest of daily stories, or get emailed once they're published. Check your Junk/Spam folder for a verification email.

Submit a tip

Please enter your email, so we know you're human.

Books You May Like

exposing great lie

Have a suggestion? Let us know! We swap out books based on your input. We participate in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. See here.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us

© Portions copyright Climate Change Dispatch

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Climate Change Dispatch

 
Share via
  • Facebook
  • Like
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Digg
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky
Share via
  • Digg
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky