• Privacy Policy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
Climate Change Dispatch
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
Climate Change Dispatch
No Result
View All Result

Four Major Factors That Cause The Climate To Change

by Dr. Jay Lehr
April 09, 2020, 11:30 AM
in News and Opinion
Reading Time: 4 mins read
A A
9

earthIt has been nearly three decades since the topic of global warming, and then climate change, came on the scene as a hot (pardon the pun) topic on the pages and screens of our news media.

Most people have taken sides as to whether or not humanity plays a role in determining the temperature of our planet.

Whichever side you choose, it may not matter because the majority of the people will make the final decision. This decision making majority is not into the climate change debate for personal gains, political power, or social rewards.

It is out of genuine concern to do the right thing for humanity, their children, and all life on Earth. Yet many are ambivalent, confused about the science or lack thereof to support one opinion or the other confidently.

I believe that most are concerned with the least important factors rather than the most accurate answers.

Let’s first establish that climate change is most definitely real. We all know that in the past, there were ice ages and wooly mammoths.

We know about the heat of the dust bowl years of the 1930s pictured in the famous movie The Grapes of Wrath.

Here I plan to give you the major vital factors that cause the climate to change.

I choose to divide the controlling factors into four groups, leaving last those issues with which the reader is likely most familiar.

The first group is related to the planetary orbit of the Earth around the Sun. The closer the Earth is to the Sun, the warmer it will be on Earth.

We learned in grade school that the Earth is 93 million miles away, orbiting around it once a year. But this orbit is not always the same but is always changing.

At times, the orbit is almost perfectly round; then, over thousands of years, it elongates and looks like a stretched out pancake, which we call an ellipse.

Figure 1

About every 100,000 years, the Sun makes a complete shift from this maximum elliptical shape when the Earth goes as much as 120 million miles away to a near-perfect round shape. Then the Earth is only 83 million miles away and it starts all over again, back to elliptical.

This changing distance between the Earth and the Sun makes a big difference, which results in a change in our climate.

Picture yourself at a campfire sitting nine feet from the fire and then moving to a place seven feet from the fire. That is the same ratio the Earth experiences moving between 83 million miles and 120 million miles.

The second factor that figures in the climate change story is the tilt of the Earth relative to the Sun.

Presently this tilt is 23.7 degrees as shown in Figure 1, but again things are always changing.

The northern hemisphere of the Earth will slowly tilt more toward the Sun, then slowly starts tilting back away from the Sun. But after 40,000 years, it will be back to the tilt we see today.

Within those 40,000 years, the tilt can range between 24.5 and 22.7 degrees. The tilt is significant as it determines winter, spring, summer, and fall and what their temperature ranges are likely to be.

The third group of factors that impact the Earth is contained within the Sun itself. The Sun undergoes very complicated and powerful magnetic cycles from high activity to low activity.

It is easy to tell the difference from here on Earth. When the activity is high, we see lots of spots on the Sun. When we see few or even none, we know the activity levels are low, as can be solar radiation.

Scientists have been carefully counting these spots for hundreds of years since Galileo got his first telescope.

With satellites and advanced telescopes, NASA gets a count every day and also measures how big or small they are.

Figure 2

As we see in Figure 2, scientists discovered without a question that these events go up and down in clear 11-year cycles.

Believe it or not, astronomers have recorded 24 such cycles in the past 250 years. Presently we are at the end of a cycle with near-zero sunspots.

NASA has confirmed in recent years that increasing sunspots are linked to increases in Earth temperature as well as the other planets, like Mars and Saturn, and even the moons.

Essentially, none of the factors in these three groups are seriously considered in the alarmist views.

They tell us that we are the primary forces controlling Earth temperatures by the burning of fossil fuels and releasing their carbon dioxide. I hope my readers can recognize the absurdity of their claims.

Now to the final group 4, the factors that logically and recognizably play a role in climate change.

It is these variables that climate modelers try to use to create equations that supposedly tell us about how our climate will change for the coming decades.

These factors are easy to understand but mostly impossible to predict.

They include such things as the impact of clouds, the role of sea ice and glaciers, hurricanes and tornadoes, vegetation, the balance between the Earth’s water, water vapor and ice, as well as the energy, flows between the oceans, the land, and the air.

With these tools and methods, we can predict the weather for the next few days, maybe even weeks away. Surely they can’t predict the weather a year away, let alone decades into the future.

I hope this short tutorial on the big climate change picture will make you more skeptical. After all, that’s the first responsibility of all real scientists: run experiments, gather data, put together a theory, then have as many experts try to shoot it down as best they can.

The output of computer models is not data. Instead, these models are used to justify the nonsense they tell us: that life on Earth will end in a dozen or so years along with other ridiculous predictions for the future.

Note: Portions of this article were excerpted from the 2020 book A Hitchhikers Journey Through Climate Change with the permission of its coauthor Terigi Ciccone. The book is the best possible source for parents and grandparents to explain reality to their children.

Earth in space image by Guillaume Preat from Pixabay

Read more at CFACT

  • Truth
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Gettr
  • Threads
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Mastodon
  • Buffer
  • Telegram
  • Email
  • Copy Link
  • Share Using More Networks…

Popular Posts

Bipolar

New Study: Ice Core Data Shows Modern Warming Is Statistically Unremarkable

Mar 05, 2026
Electric Vehicles (EVs)

The ‘Green’ Scam Of The Century: How ‘Renewables’ Increase Fossil Fuel Demands

Oct 23, 2024
News and Opinion

Antarctica Is Colder, Icier Today Than At Any Time In 5,000 Years

Apr 15, 2024

Comments 9

  1. Amber says:
    6 years ago

    The COVID – 19 models are an example of the serious flaws with multi
    input variables that are at best guesses .
    The global warming models used to justify the earth has a fever pandemic
    grossly over stated any warming but they stuck .
    The almost weekly changes to the COVID -19 models and dramatically revised forecasts bring home the fact policy based on models are wrong .

  2. Graham McDonald says:
    6 years ago

    So, researchers are looking at the current readings of atmospheric carbon dioxide content, hoping to find that a drop in that value due to the world wide slowing/shutdown of industry, might precede a drop in global temperature. Then it will be – “Carbon dioxide really is the ‘control knob’ for temperature”.

    In the Great Depression, the two major industrial producers of CO2 were the US and Germany. Coal consumption dropped about 45% in the US and about 35% in Germany in the 1930’s. The mid 30’s marked the height of the ‘dust bowl’ era, hot and dry. I wonder what is going to happen this time – if anything…..

  3. Brian R Catt says:
    6 years ago

    This is correct. The cycles that affect the 1,000 year cycles up and down of a couple of degrees are both well known/observed in fact and closely related to solar cycles that are shown in cosmogenic elements that are well detected in the 11 years solar cycles, so a clear indicator of 1,000 year cycles.. The 3 main MIlnkovitch cycles closely control the progress of the ice ages by in combination through the effects of of orbital forcing, on scale well outside the climate change debate by humans, whose interglacial civilisation occupies 1/10 of one 100Ka ice age cycle.

    Analysing the actual proxy and direct temperature data for cycles shows them clearly, and also the lack of a monotonic signal that a human AGW effect would cause. So the theory regarding AGW has been proven wrong on the basic analysis of the actual records. It only needs one person to prove the consensus, which has never been proved right, wrong. Attacking the paper as denial with a contrary consensus proves nothing in science fact, only proving the Ludecke and Weiss paper wrong in fact makes their reality go away. Thre is no significant AGW. “All we see is cycles”.

    But The Milankovitch Cycle is irrelevant in this context. They do cause the much longer interglacial cycles, I suggest by a considerable increase in the well known planetary twerking effect they exert on the solid Earth, for the 100Ka cycle at times of maximum eccentricity, and hence the large submarine volcanic increase, that we also observe at these times by the same Fourier analysis, but of emission rates.. NOT by the atmospheric effect, of CO2 or anything else, the direct ocean warming is far more powerful.

    Not just a theory, or a computerised numerical model with “forcing” assumptions, a direct physical effect supported by actual observations. This is my theory, which is mine…..

    http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3259379

  4. Spurwing Plover says:
    6 years ago

    The biggist lie the Eco-Freaks have Spread is The earth is Fragile and another of their lies is the delicate Balance of Nature(I have heard this one for long time)and We are Not Destroying the Earth anyone who thinks were destroying the earth is either Stupid or just plain Misinformed

  5. David Lewis says:
    6 years ago

    The article left out the geology impacts to climate. We all know about El Niño. This is caused by warming in Equatorial Pacific. This is believed to be caused by geological vents deep in the ocean. In past the fine particulate matter thrown up by a very large volcanic eruption has caused cooling for a few years. If the geological activity under the West Antarctic Ice Sheet ever sends it into the ocean a lot of lower elevation land will be flooded and this has to impact the climate. However, climate activists are in denial that anything other than CO2 has an influence on the climate because only by reducing carbon dioxide emissions can they made “rapid, far-reaching and unprecedented changes in all aspects of society”

  6. Chaamjamal says:
    6 years ago

    The AGW climate change issue is whether the recovery from the Little Ice Age and the subsequent warming that has persisted to this day is dtiven by fossil fuel emissions and whether it can or should be stopped by reducing fossil fuel emissions to zero. What on earth is the relevance in this context of glaciation cycles and the sunspot cycle????

    • Barry Bateman says:
      6 years ago

      Chaamjmal, the Little Ice Age began in the 1600s. The thermometer was invented a hundred years later. Climate moves naturally in far greater swings and far more powerfully than the insignificant effect from 0.01% of the atmosphere CO2. That is the relevance. CO2, the essential ingredient molecule for life on earth has increased about 40%. That is far more important for life on earth (a good thing) than it is influential on climate. And since multicellular life began 600 million years ago near 7000ppm, and all life begins to die at 150ppm, and since during glacial phases of our ONGOING Pleistocene/Holocene Ice Age CO2 declines to within 30ppm of lethality, that is also relevant.

      • Chaamjamal says:
        6 years ago

        Respectfully disagree sir. The issue is Holocene dynamics at centennial and millennial time scales. The Milankovitch Cycle is irrelevant in this context.

    • Russell Seitz says:
      6 years ago

      Quite right- the author of this shameless guff is a poster child for bothscientific illeracy and intellectual dishonesty

Stay Connected!

gab-logo

Donate Today

Beating back the alarmist narrative takes time and money. Please donate today to help!

Get notified when new posts are published!

Subscribe to receive a digest of daily stories, or get emailed once they're published. Check your Junk/Spam folder for a verification email.

Recent Posts

  • Meteorologist Torches BBC For Linking Climate Change To Trillion-Dollar Disaster Losses
    Apr 10, 2026
    Meteorologist challenges BBC trillion-dollar climate damage claim, citing disaster loss data and no clear trend after adjusting for growth and exposure. […]
  • transmission linesElectric Shock: How Bad Green Policy Sent Power Prices Soaring
    Apr 10, 2026
    US electricity prices have surged after years of stability, driven largely by policy choices shaping generation, regulation, and grid costs. […]
  • starmer energy pricesUK Energy Costs, Net Zero Push And Red Tape Kill Massive OpenAI Investment
    Apr 10, 2026
    OpenAI’s delayed UK investment highlights energy costs, net zero pressures, and planning delays that continue to strangle major tech projects. […]
  • nuclear cooling towersNew Jersey Ends Decades-Old Nuclear Power Ban To Tackle Rising Energy Costs
    Apr 10, 2026
    New Jersey ends a decades-old ban, allowing new power projects as officials look to lower sky-high energy costs and improve grid reliability. […]
  • gas pump stationMinnesota Lawmakers Turn Budget Crisis Into ‘Climate Superfund’ Cash Grab
    Apr 9, 2026
    Minnesota’s proposed climate superfund targets energy companies, but costs won’t stay there—they’ll be passed on to consumers at the pump and beyond. […]
  • roulette newsomEU Bets On Newsom As Trump Clashes With Europe’s Climate Socialism
    Apr 9, 2026
    Europe and the UK look to Gavin Newsom as the 48th president to roll back Trump’s agenda and resume climate socialism. […]
  • miliband solarMad Miliband Overrules Locals, Greenlights Britain’s Largest Solar Monstrosity
    Apr 9, 2026
    Ed Miliband approves a massive Lincolnshire solar farm over local protests, raising concerns over farmland loss and Labour’s planning powers. […]
  • refinery aerialWith India’s Help, Trump’s Brownsville Refinery Set To Supercharge U.S. Energy
    Apr 8, 2026
    A new Brownsville refinery built by India’s Reliance will ease U.S. shale bottlenecks, boosting exports, capacity, and energy dominance. […]
  • sunrise movement protestAntifa-Linked Green Group Plans ‘Political Revolution’ Against Trump, Billionaires
    Apr 8, 2026
    Far-left Sunrise Movement training materials reveal plans for a political revolution targeting Trump, corporations, and the two-party system. […]
  • boulderBoulder Unlikely To Hit Climate Goals Despite Aggressive Anti-Fossil Fuel Policies
    Apr 8, 2026
    Boulder’s anti-fossil fuel policies won’t get it to net-zero by 2035 or impact global warming due to rising emissions elsewhere. […]

Submit a tip

Please enter your email, so we know you're human.

Books You May Like

Cold Facts About the Great Global Warming Scam

Climate prn book

Have a suggestion? Let us know! We swap out books based on your input. We participate in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. See here.

  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA Policy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us

© Portions copyright Climate Change Dispatch

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Climate Change Dispatch

 
Share via
  • Facebook
  • Like
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Digg
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky
Share via
  • Digg
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky