A recent (paywalled) Financial Times (FT) article, “‘Too hot to handle’: climate change pushing Arab region to limits, says WMO,” claims that the Arab region is being simultaneously hammered by increasing heatwaves, droughts, and paradoxically, more flooding and extreme rainfall, all due to human use of fossil fuels. [emphasis, links added]
The FT’s story is misleading at best, and false at worst.
While one World Meteorological Organization (WMO) report referenced by the FT does say that heatwaves have increased in the region, the data are not as alarming as the FT frames them, and no evidence that giving up fossil fuels will help anyone.
FT reported that the Arab region, which they defined as the region from the Arabian peninsula and Levant to North Africa and Somalia, is “being pushed to its limits by intense heatwaves and severe droughts, the latest World Meteorological Organization report found, as it warms at twice the global average.”
FT did not actually link to the report in their piece, which was unfortunate, because it was interesting to read through. Luckily, it was not hard to find on the WMO website.
The areas in the report that are supposedly suffering the worst heatwaves are all places that are already famous for extreme heat, located in the hot, arid desert of North Africa.
But even across that broad region, the most intense increase in the number of heatwave days in 2024 compared to the 1991-2020 average is 14 extra days in one area, according to ERA5 land temperature data.
Most of that data shows no extra days of extreme heat across the region.
To the West, there was a noted decline in heatwave days. The chart on the left, shown below, is also just for 2024, which the WMO admits was an El Niño year, which drives global temperatures up.
Data for this year will almost certainly show more moderate temperatures.
It is also no wonder that the Arab region warms at “twice the global average,” as 70 percent of the globe is covered by oceans, where the air-temperature rise has been generally much lower than over land.
As such, it’s a meaningless statement, since almost all land areas will be on the higher side, making up the global average. These kinds of statements are meant to provoke fear and have little scientific value.
FT goes on to claim that the report “warned that drought conditions in the Arab region had been worsening, particularly in western North Africa, after six consecutive failed rainy seasons.”
This is an odd statement, since the “drought” section of the WMO report itself says:
“[T]rend analysis does not indicate statistically significant changes in drought intensity across the subregions, suggesting that while drought remains a recurrent hazard, its long-term severity has remained relatively stable over the study period.”
So on this point, the FT totally misrepresented the findings of the study they were citing as evidence for worsening drought.
It seems the FT writers did not go deeper than the “key messages” page at the very beginning of the report, which are somewhat misleading compared to the actual content of the full report.
Since climate change is a set of long-term phenomena, long-term trends matter most as shorter periods are merely weather, which can [vary in severity from year to year or even over a decade or two, as has been the case throughout Earth’s history].
FT added,
“WMO secretary-general Celeste Saulo said intense heatwaves, where temperatures have hit 50C in some Arab countries, were “pushing society to the limits”.
While 122°F is definitely hot, it is also definitely not unprecedented across the region. An article at Weather Underground’s blog (the weather service, not the terror group) describes an all-time “reliable” temperature measured in Algeria of 124°F in 2018, and explains that older recorded highs are questionable because of spotty recording quality.
The Arabic region was less developed than Europe, for instance, even in the early twentieth century, which means records have a shorter time span.
Funnily enough, FT is willing to call this year’s cooling natural: “this year is expected to be among the top three warmest despite the cooling effect of the naturally occurring La Niña cycle in the Pacific Ocean.”
El Niño is glaringly unmentioned in the article, despite being responsible for 2024’s temperature spike.
With regards to flooding and precipitation, the WMO identifies no trend in rainfall or flooding across the Arabian region. Breaking it down into subregions, East Africa has seen an increase in average annual precipitation, while North Africa has begun to see a decline since 2010.
The region saw several major floods in 2024, says the WMO report, but it does not attempt to put the flooding in long-term historical context.
As Climate Realism has discussed in the past, flooding in Africa and other parts of the world tends to have more to do with urban development than simply weather events.
The same amount of rainfall during a year in the past that caused no recorded flooding can result in floods at another time in the same area if urban development increases in a flood zone at that time and water management infrastructure doesn’t keep pace with development. The increase in impermeable surfaces by itself can lead to flooding from even modest rains.
FT attributes harmful weather conditions and all extreme events to the use of fossil fuels. This is nonsense.
As Climate Realism has pointed out many times, the science is far from settled when it comes to the degree of impact of carbon dioxide emissions on global average temperature, and the science is also far from settled on what the modest warming’s impact on weather events has been over the past hundred-plus years.
The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has identified no clear trends in flooding and has only moderate confidence that it can attribute a modest change in some types of drought in a few small areas to climate change.
Preventing societies from becoming more resilient [to extreme weather events when they do occur is a recipe for disaster; this is achieved by eliminating stable electricity sources (especially for heating and air conditioning), fuel, emergency power, and materials like concrete and steel. When natural disasters inevitably strike, people will suffer greatly].
Fossil fuels make possible more than 6,000 products and power thousands of technologies and systems, many of which are critical to public health, communication, transportation, modern infrastructure, mapping and early warning systems, and emergency services.
These prevent or mitigate weather-related harms, while boosting climate resilience.
The FT article misrepresents some parts of the WMO report, while inappropriately exaggerating the potential dangers described in other parts of it.
The FT’s story is far more alarming than the research it is supposedly reporting on. It would behoove journalists to look at the actual data provided in these reports and others like them, rather than simply taking exaggerated talking points on faith.
Looking below the surface and possibly checking a study’s findings against other research on the topic would show some integrity on the part of the writers, in the process better educating them and their readers about the non-catastrophic state of the climate.
Read more at Climate Realism
The M.S. Media is only interested in pushing leftists agenda then in the truth after all back in the 1970’s in was Global Cooling and a New Ice Age was Top News long before Gore the Bore was anything and episode of In Search of(1978)was about the Hard Winter that hit Buffalo New York back in the winter of 1976/77
Let them scientifically prove that Climate change (Global warming) is the cause of these problems
Following actual scientific research using a null hypothesis they can’t. Instead it’s all about “climate science” computer models that tell us that human caused CO2 release is causing the problems…