• Privacy Policy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
Climate Change Dispatch
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
Climate Change Dispatch
No Result
View All Result

EXCLUSIVE: Eco-Billionaire Gave 500K To Oakland Mayor’s Pet Project Shortly Before Climate Lawsuit Filed

by Chris White
February 22, 2018, 2:05 PM
in News and Opinion
Reading Time: 4 mins read
A A
1

An anti-oil California billionaire poured half a million dollars into one of Oakland Mayor Libby Schaaf’s favorite educational programs shortly before the city announced lawsuits against energy companies, according to documents The Daily Caller News Foundation obtained.

Tom Steyer provided Schaaf with a $500,000 donation to Oakland Promise Generation Fund and Children’s Initiative, a project the mayor uses to provide financial assistance to low-income students. TheDCNF’s documents also appear to show Steyer and Schaaf meeting less than a year later about an important matter.

The Beneficial State Bank, a California bank Steyer founded to fund local businesses with limited access to financial loans, holds all the money for the program, including the sizeable donation that Steyer and his wife Kat Taylor gave to Schaaf’s project. The documents show officials in the mayor’s office organizing the nuts and bolts undergirding the monetary gift.

“She (Oakland Promise’s communication’s manager) will be able to help you … acknowledge Tom and Kat’s recent and generous $500K contribution to the OP scholarships and college savings programs,” Amanda Feinstein, a scheduler in Schaaf’s office, wrote in a Nov. 3, 2016, email to Erin Eisenberg, the director of philanthropy for the TomKat Foundation.

Schaaf reached out to Steyer’s people several months later for additional donations. The mayor wrote to Taylor last August to thank her for going to city hall on Aug. 28 to discuss the previous donations to Oakland Promise. She went on to suggest meeting in the future for additional funding.

“Please let us know when you have gotten a chance to talk with Tom and if there is anything we can provide to support your consideration,” Schaaf wrote in an Aug. 31 email to Taylor, who provided a go-between for Steyer and the mayor. Daniela Castro, a scheduler with Fahr, a group the Democratic moneyman founded to coordinate his philanthropic efforts, responded less than a week later with an email noting the importance of meeting Schaaf.

“Kaylee – pls schedule Kat to meet with Andrea tomorrow at SeaCliff instead as it is time sensitive,” Castro wrote in a Sept. 7 email to Schaaf’s executive scheduler, Lauren Blanchard – the email was an attempt to arrange a meeting between Taylor and the mayor’s office at City Hall. He provided the mayor with Kat’s phone number on Sept. 15, and Schaaf announced the city would sue ExxonMobil, Chevron, and others for their supposed role in contributing to global warming.

Oakland, San Francisco, Santa Cruz and Imperial Beach are also plaintiffs with Shaaf, as are Santa Cruz County, San Mateo County, and Marin County. They are among a slew of local areas suing to hold Exxon and other energy companies’ responsible what plaintiffs believe are costs associated with global warming.

A report from the Daily Mail last December also showed a close linkage between these lawsuits and Steyer. Two officials inside his nonprofit group, NextGen, were briefed in 2015 on the strategy behind a legal crusade against various oil producers, the Daily Mail report noted at the times. He has repeatedly denied any involvement in campaigns to sue companies like Exxon.

But documents and emails have continued to leak out suggesting otherwise. Oakland, San Francisco, and New York City began pursuing lawsuits against major oil companies in early 2016 to flesh out the degree to which they were contributing to greenhouse gas levels. San Francisco announced it would sue companies like BP, Chevron, Exxon and others, shortly after Steyer provided city’s mayor with a $30,000 campaign donation.

Neither Steyer nor Schaaf’s office responded to requests for comment from TheDCNF about the nature of the communications and whether they played a role in the mayor’s decision to join the climate change lawsuits. Steyer was linked to a climate lawsuit in 2016 with similar characteristics as the one the Oakland mayor sought.

Democratic Attorney General Eric Schneiderman tried to finagle meetings and phone communications with Steyer four months after the Empire State lawman announced in 2016 his lawsuit against Exxon, according to emails the New York Post obtained at the time. The email was addressed to the director of strategic planning Fahr, the same group arranged Steyer to meet with Schaaf.

One of Schneiderman’s aides tried to arrange a phone meeting between the AG and Steyer and referenced the lawman’s need for support for a gubernatorial race in the context of his investigation of ExxonMobil. “Eric Schneiderman would like to have a call with Tom regarding support for his race for governor … regarding Exxon case,” reads the March 10 e-mail, which Steyer received.

Schneiderman subsequently used a legal maneuver to prevent groups from obtaining more emails related to his probes. He is refusing to produce emails between his office and wealthy Democratic donors — including Rockefeller Brothers Fund, Rockefeller Family Fund, and Steyer. Exxon claims he is trying to protect the groups that are backing the campaign.

Steyer has wriggled his way into various Democratic campaigns in the past. His money heavily influenced the Democratic National Committee’s 2016 campaign platform on global warming and green energy, according to hacked Democratic National Committee (DNC) emails uncovered shortly after the election by the conservative legal group Energy and Environment Legal Institute.

The party platform changed dramatically to mirror the wealthy philanthropist’s mission, in that it now asks the U.S. to generate at least half of its energy from non-carbon-emitting sources such as solar and wind by 2030.

Read more at Daily Caller

  • Truth
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Gettr
  • Threads
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Mastodon
  • Buffer
  • Telegram
  • Email
  • Copy Link
  • Share Using More Networks…

Popular Posts

Bipolar

New Study: Ice Core Data Shows Modern Warming Is Statistically Unremarkable

Mar 05, 2026
Electric Vehicles (EVs)

The ‘Green’ Scam Of The Century: How ‘Renewables’ Increase Fossil Fuel Demands

Oct 23, 2024
News and Opinion

Antarctica Is Colder, Icier Today Than At Any Time In 5,000 Years

Apr 15, 2024

Comments 1

  1. Spurwing Plover says:
    8 years ago

    He sounds like another Ted Turner type of person who brainwashes kids with their Go Green ideas and like Michael Bloomberg and George Soros throws money into leftists brainwashing programs

Stay Connected!

gab-logo

Donate Today

Beating back the alarmist narrative takes time and money. Please donate today to help!

Get notified when new posts are published!

Subscribe to receive a digest of daily stories, or get emailed once they're published. Check your Junk/Spam folder for a verification email.

Recent Posts

  • Meteorologist Torches BBC For Linking Climate Change To Trillion-Dollar Disaster Losses
    Apr 10, 2026
    Meteorologist challenges BBC trillion-dollar climate damage claim, citing disaster loss data and no clear trend after adjusting for growth and exposure. […]
  • transmission linesElectric Shock: How Bad Green Policy Sent Power Prices Soaring
    Apr 10, 2026
    US electricity prices have surged after years of stability, driven largely by policy choices shaping generation, regulation, and grid costs. […]
  • starmer energy pricesUK Energy Costs, Net Zero Push And Red Tape Kill Massive OpenAI Investment
    Apr 10, 2026
    OpenAI’s delayed UK investment highlights energy costs, net zero pressures, and planning delays that continue to strangle major tech projects. […]
  • nuclear cooling towersNew Jersey Ends Decades-Old Nuclear Power Ban To Tackle Rising Energy Costs
    Apr 10, 2026
    New Jersey ends a decades-old ban, allowing new power projects as officials look to lower sky-high energy costs and improve grid reliability. […]
  • gas pump stationMinnesota Lawmakers Turn Budget Crisis Into ‘Climate Superfund’ Cash Grab
    Apr 9, 2026
    Minnesota’s proposed climate superfund targets energy companies, but costs won’t stay there—they’ll be passed on to consumers at the pump and beyond. […]
  • roulette newsomEU Bets On Newsom As Trump Clashes With Europe’s Climate Socialism
    Apr 9, 2026
    Europe and the UK look to Gavin Newsom as the 48th president to roll back Trump’s agenda and resume climate socialism. […]
  • miliband solarMad Miliband Overrules Locals, Greenlights Britain’s Largest Solar Monstrosity
    Apr 9, 2026
    Ed Miliband approves a massive Lincolnshire solar farm over local protests, raising concerns over farmland loss and Labour’s planning powers. […]
  • refinery aerialWith India’s Help, Trump’s Brownsville Refinery Set To Supercharge U.S. Energy
    Apr 8, 2026
    A new Brownsville refinery built by India’s Reliance will ease U.S. shale bottlenecks, boosting exports, capacity, and energy dominance. […]
  • sunrise movement protestAntifa-Linked Green Group Plans ‘Political Revolution’ Against Trump, Billionaires
    Apr 8, 2026
    Far-left Sunrise Movement training materials reveal plans for a political revolution targeting Trump, corporations, and the two-party system. […]
  • boulderBoulder Unlikely To Hit Climate Goals Despite Aggressive Anti-Fossil Fuel Policies
    Apr 8, 2026
    Boulder’s anti-fossil fuel policies won’t get it to net-zero by 2035 or impact global warming due to rising emissions elsewhere. […]

Submit a tip

Please enter your email, so we know you're human.

Books You May Like

Cold Facts About the Great Global Warming Scam

Climate prn book

Have a suggestion? Let us know! We swap out books based on your input. We participate in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. See here.

  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA Policy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us

© Portions copyright Climate Change Dispatch

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Climate Change Dispatch

 
Share via
  • Facebook
  • Like
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Digg
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky
Share via
  • Digg
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky