• Privacy Policy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
Climate Change Dispatch
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
Climate Change Dispatch
No Result
View All Result

EXCLUSIVE: Eco-Billionaire Gave 500K To Oakland Mayor’s Pet Project Shortly Before Climate Lawsuit Filed

by Chris White
February 22, 2018, 2:05 PM
in News and Opinion
Reading Time: 4 mins read
A A
1

An anti-oil California billionaire poured half a million dollars into one of Oakland Mayor Libby Schaaf’s favorite educational programs shortly before the city announced lawsuits against energy companies, according to documents The Daily Caller News Foundation obtained.

Tom Steyer provided Schaaf with a $500,000 donation to Oakland Promise Generation Fund and Children’s Initiative, a project the mayor uses to provide financial assistance to low-income students. TheDCNF’s documents also appear to show Steyer and Schaaf meeting less than a year later about an important matter.

The Beneficial State Bank, a California bank Steyer founded to fund local businesses with limited access to financial loans, holds all the money for the program, including the sizeable donation that Steyer and his wife Kat Taylor gave to Schaaf’s project. The documents show officials in the mayor’s office organizing the nuts and bolts undergirding the monetary gift.

“She (Oakland Promise’s communication’s manager) will be able to help you … acknowledge Tom and Kat’s recent and generous $500K contribution to the OP scholarships and college savings programs,” Amanda Feinstein, a scheduler in Schaaf’s office, wrote in a Nov. 3, 2016, email to Erin Eisenberg, the director of philanthropy for the TomKat Foundation.

Schaaf reached out to Steyer’s people several months later for additional donations. The mayor wrote to Taylor last August to thank her for going to city hall on Aug. 28 to discuss the previous donations to Oakland Promise. She went on to suggest meeting in the future for additional funding.

“Please let us know when you have gotten a chance to talk with Tom and if there is anything we can provide to support your consideration,” Schaaf wrote in an Aug. 31 email to Taylor, who provided a go-between for Steyer and the mayor. Daniela Castro, a scheduler with Fahr, a group the Democratic moneyman founded to coordinate his philanthropic efforts, responded less than a week later with an email noting the importance of meeting Schaaf.

“Kaylee – pls schedule Kat to meet with Andrea tomorrow at SeaCliff instead as it is time sensitive,” Castro wrote in a Sept. 7 email to Schaaf’s executive scheduler, Lauren Blanchard – the email was an attempt to arrange a meeting between Taylor and the mayor’s office at City Hall. He provided the mayor with Kat’s phone number on Sept. 15, and Schaaf announced the city would sue ExxonMobil, Chevron, and others for their supposed role in contributing to global warming.

Oakland, San Francisco, Santa Cruz and Imperial Beach are also plaintiffs with Shaaf, as are Santa Cruz County, San Mateo County, and Marin County. They are among a slew of local areas suing to hold Exxon and other energy companies’ responsible what plaintiffs believe are costs associated with global warming.

A report from the Daily Mail last December also showed a close linkage between these lawsuits and Steyer. Two officials inside his nonprofit group, NextGen, were briefed in 2015 on the strategy behind a legal crusade against various oil producers, the Daily Mail report noted at the times. He has repeatedly denied any involvement in campaigns to sue companies like Exxon.

But documents and emails have continued to leak out suggesting otherwise. Oakland, San Francisco, and New York City began pursuing lawsuits against major oil companies in early 2016 to flesh out the degree to which they were contributing to greenhouse gas levels. San Francisco announced it would sue companies like BP, Chevron, Exxon and others, shortly after Steyer provided city’s mayor with a $30,000 campaign donation.

Neither Steyer nor Schaaf’s office responded to requests for comment from TheDCNF about the nature of the communications and whether they played a role in the mayor’s decision to join the climate change lawsuits. Steyer was linked to a climate lawsuit in 2016 with similar characteristics as the one the Oakland mayor sought.

Democratic Attorney General Eric Schneiderman tried to finagle meetings and phone communications with Steyer four months after the Empire State lawman announced in 2016 his lawsuit against Exxon, according to emails the New York Post obtained at the time. The email was addressed to the director of strategic planning Fahr, the same group arranged Steyer to meet with Schaaf.

One of Schneiderman’s aides tried to arrange a phone meeting between the AG and Steyer and referenced the lawman’s need for support for a gubernatorial race in the context of his investigation of ExxonMobil. “Eric Schneiderman would like to have a call with Tom regarding support for his race for governor … regarding Exxon case,” reads the March 10 e-mail, which Steyer received.

Schneiderman subsequently used a legal maneuver to prevent groups from obtaining more emails related to his probes. He is refusing to produce emails between his office and wealthy Democratic donors — including Rockefeller Brothers Fund, Rockefeller Family Fund, and Steyer. Exxon claims he is trying to protect the groups that are backing the campaign.

Steyer has wriggled his way into various Democratic campaigns in the past. His money heavily influenced the Democratic National Committee’s 2016 campaign platform on global warming and green energy, according to hacked Democratic National Committee (DNC) emails uncovered shortly after the election by the conservative legal group Energy and Environment Legal Institute.

The party platform changed dramatically to mirror the wealthy philanthropist’s mission, in that it now asks the U.S. to generate at least half of its energy from non-carbon-emitting sources such as solar and wind by 2030.

Read more at Daily Caller

  • Truth
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Gettr
  • Threads
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Mastodon
  • Buffer
  • Telegram
  • Email
  • Copy Link
  • Share Using More Networks…

Popular Posts

Electric Vehicles (EVs)

The ‘Green’ Scam Of The Century: How ‘Renewables’ Increase Fossil Fuel Demands

Oct 23, 2024
News and Opinion

Antarctica Is Colder, Icier Today Than At Any Time In 5,000 Years

Apr 15, 2024
Energy

30-Plus Signs That The Climate Scam Is Collapsing

Apr 09, 2025

Comments 1

  1. Spurwing Plover says:
    8 years ago

    He sounds like another Ted Turner type of person who brainwashes kids with their Go Green ideas and like Michael Bloomberg and George Soros throws money into leftists brainwashing programs

Stay Connected On Social Media

gab-logo

Donate Today

Beating back the alarmist narrative takes time and money. Please donate today to help!

Recent Posts

  • fuvahmulah island maldivesNew Scientist Misses The Science On ‘Sinking Pacific Islands’
    Jan 16, 2026
    Real-world data show many Pacific atolls are stable or growing, contradicting claims of inevitable sea-level submergence. […]
  • hochul energy cliffNew York’s Climate Act Goes Nuclear: Bold Promises, Zero Progress
    Jan 16, 2026
    New York’s Climate Act promises bold energy goals, but seven years in any progress is nonexistent and nuclear plans lag way behind. […]
  • Global disaster counts remain flat over 25 years, despite rising CO2 and record temperaturesA Climatologist Asks: Where Are All The Climate-Related Disasters?
    Jan 16, 2026
    Despite record CO2 and global temperatures, climate-related disasters haven’t increased—what the data really show. […]
  • miliband offshore wind ahoy mateyThe Climate Scaremongers: ‘Record’ Offshore Wind Auction Will Add Billions To UK Power Bills
    Jan 16, 2026
    Despite “record” claims, offshore wind contracts rely on heavy subsidies that will push UK electricity bills even higher. […]
  • Twenty Years Later, An Inconvenient Truth Fails to Hold UpTwenty Years On, Al Gore’s ‘An Inconvenient Truth’ Thoroughly Debunked
    Jan 15, 2026
    Twenty years later, Al Gore’s ‘An Inconvenient Truth’ predictions, from Kilimanjaro to glaciers, have failed to materialize. […]
  • bbcBBC Pushes 12% Pay Cut Claim Built On Hypothetical Models, Not Actual Data
    Jan 15, 2026
    BBC claims climate change is cutting U.S. pay by 12%. A meteorologist shows why the data tells a very different story. […]
  • Kamala Harris seaside mansionKamala Buys $8M Malibu Mansion Despite Her Climate Warnings About Rising Seas
    Jan 15, 2026
    Kamala buys $8.2M Malibu mansion near beaches she warned could flood from rising seas and extreme weather. […]
  • sun hazeWhy Blotting Out The Sun Borders On Climate Madness
    Jan 15, 2026
    When green groups try to block the sun, the risks to wildlife, crops, and climate show the sheer folly of solar geoengineering. […]
  • homeowners insurance policy court gavelBlue States Push Climate Liability Bills That Would Hike Costs For Consumers
    Jan 15, 2026
    Blue states are pushing climate liability bills that could make homeowners pay more while targeting energy companies. […]
  • supreme court buildingSCOTUS Weighs Whether Oil Companies Can Shift Climate Lawsuits To Federal Court
    Jan 14, 2026
    Justices weighed whether oil companies can move climate lawsuits to federal court, while warning of a potential exodus from state tort cases. […]

Get Instant Email Notifications

Subscribe to receive a digest of daily stories, or get emailed once they're published. Check your Junk/Spam folder for a verification email.

Submit a tip

Please enter your email, so we know you're human.

Books You May Like

exposing great lie

Have a suggestion? Let us know! We swap out books based on your input. We participate in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. See here.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us

© Portions copyright Climate Change Dispatch

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Climate Change Dispatch

 
Share via
  • Facebook
  • Like
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Digg
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky
Share via
  • Digg
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky