Inventiveness plus boldness equals progress.
Liberal “activists” who want to revolutionize the nation’s energy resources demonstrate political moxie, but if their campaign to substitute renewable sources for fossil fuels — oil and gas — succeeds it will take more than happy thoughts to keep the lights on.
Michael Bloomberg, the billionaire former mayor of New York City, pledges to donate $500 million to a campaign to shutter the nation’s remaining coal-fired power plants by 2030.
The billionaire told the Class of ‘19 at Massachusetts Institute of Technology the other day that his Bloomberg Philanthropies, in partnership with the Sierra Club, played a role in closing 289 coal-fired plants — half of the nation’s existing power plants — since 2011.
He says he’ll try to pull the plug on the rest, all to save the planet from the changing climate.
“Building on the success of the Beyond Coal campaign, I’m committing $500 million to launch @BeyondCarbon the largest-ever coordinated campaign to tackle the worst climate crisis our country has ever seen, Mr. Bloomberg tweeted last week. “This is the fight of our time.”
The money will be spent primarily on funding environmental organizations adept at lobbying government officials to go “green.”
He aims to take out clean-burning natural gas power plants as well. “By the time they are built, they’ll be out of date because renewable will be cheaper,” he told the graduates.
The sometime Democrat joins other party notables in their quixotic crusade to rid the world of fossil fuels, thus avoiding the combustion that climate alarmists contend produces global warming.
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s $30 trillion Green New Deal, Joe Biden’s $5 trillion Clean Energy Revolution, Jay Inslee’s $3 trillion Global Climate Mobilization dream of a world powered by windmills, solar panels and other carbon-free technologies, all in hopes of preventing the thermometer from rising a fraction of a degree by the year 2100.
You don’t need a degree in advanced mathematics from MIT to see that the numbers don’t add up.
Despite a generation of obsession with climate issues, most U.S. electricity is still generated by fossil fuels.
Natural gas produces 35.1 percent of the kilowattage, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration, and coal is responsible for 27.4 percent.
In contrast, all the sunshine, windmills, and waterwheels that climate fanatics are banking on to keep wheels of progress turning, generate only 17.1 percent of the nation’s electricity.
About 7 percent comes from water over the dams. Wind and solar contribute 6.6 percent and 1.6 percent. The fossils generate the rest.
If fossil-fuel power plants are to go the way of the clipper ships over the next decade, something must replace them. Going solely solar would require installing solar panels over an area of land nearly the size of West Virginia.
Generating just 20 percent of U.S. energy needs from wind would require mounting turbines on an area encompassing land the size of New Hampshire and Vermont.
About 900 hydroelectric plants were demolished between 1990 and 2015 owing to opposition from environmentalists outraged by harm to fish ecosystems.
Nuclear plants would get similarly rough treatment at the hands of fanatics frightened by the prospect of nuclear power.
Solar and wind power flit across the landscape intermittently, requiring an alternate source, like coal or gas, to make electricity when nature takes a break.
Environmentally friendly Europeans find that a lack of reliable backup when nature takes that break increases the risk of electrical grid failures.
German engineering, as good as it is, has not been able to eliminate the effect of “green” politics, which would replace fossil and nuclear power with renewables. The result is 172,000 localized blackouts in Germany in 2017.
Poverty was a constant companion of humanity until modern times. The proportion of people worldwide living in poverty was cut in half between 1990 and 2010, according to the World Bank, an achievement unprecedented in human history.
It was the result of a rapid boost in global energy production — up 43 percent during that period, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration. Nearly 81 percent of that power was generated by fossil fuels, such as oil and gas.
A billion people around the globe still suffer extreme energy poverty, with no access to electricity. Everyone gets a hint of what that means when storms knock out the power, and everything in the house stops.
Fumbling occasionally for candles is a mere inconvenience, but life beyond carbon — entirely dependent on sunshine and a breeze — would be insanity.
Read more at Washington Times
Some idiots suggest we switch to using bicycles but lets see someone geta a big load pf grooersies a months worth home on bicycles it would take you all day long or go for a vacation to Disneyland or The Grand Canyon,Mt Rushmore on bicycles even if we see some bunch of Nit-Wits doing it for some dumb liberal news shows
Let’s just say all us “have ” countries got all virtuous and weren’t so hypocritical banning the use of fossil fuels , return to cave dweller states . Then what ?
Will the world stop it’s current warming trend and how long before the “have not’s ” realize how stupid we are and just exterminate us
The climate fraud industry is in trouble because the doom and gloom of failed climate models which are biased , incomplete and just don’t work
have claimed i climate Armageddon so long they are tuned out .
Earth ends in less than 12 years just adds to peoples contempt for the fraud .
Lets take all those Anti-Fossil Fuel Nit-Wits and make them all live in a Grass Hut or a Cave(With all the Bats and Creepy Crawly Things)let them all live like Hermits far away from the rest of us lets see how long their fools could take it with no Friends or Family around
To take over control you need to make up a good ‘ol catastrophic existential crisis. Which they have done. The Climate hoax. And now the elites are lining up to finance the takeover and subjugation of the peasant masses through energy poverty. All according to plan.
Yes it is an idiocy. But unfortunately the idiots are running the insane asylum now. And with the billions that Bloomberg, Steyer, and others have we could be in major trouble.