• Privacy Policy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
Climate Change Dispatch
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
Climate Change Dispatch
No Result
View All Result

Elon Musk Cons South Australia out of $50 million

by JAMES DELINGPOLE
November 28, 2017, 3:11 PM
in News and Opinion
Reading Time: 3 mins read
A A
5

Whoever handles Elon Musk’s public relations deserves a medal.

The slippery snake oil salesman and rent-seeker extraordinaire has been down to South Australia – now reduced, pretty much, to a third-world state under its disastrous left-wing administration – and conned the hapless locals out of $50 million to build them an all-but-useless giant battery to make up for the energy they have lost by blowing up their coal-fired power station and relying on wind power instead.

And how are the lickspittle media reporting this outrageous scam?

Why thus:

Tesla Fulfilled Its 100-Day Australia Battery Bet. What’s That Mean for the Industry?

and thus:

Elon Musk wins bet, finishing massive battery installation in 100 days

and thus:

and thus:

Incredible $50 MILLION bet between Elon Musk and Australian Atlassian tech king pays off with Tesla building a giant solar battery in Adelaide

With a media as compliant and unquestioning as this, is it any wonder Tesla’s price is still about $300 higher than it should be and that governments continue to spend taxpayers’ billions bankrolling his quixotic schemes?

Let’s just have a quick reality check here, shall we?

Obvious Truth #1. This “bet” is #fakenews.

A bet is where you risk a sum of money on a chance event on whose outcome you are uncertain. Musk knew perfectly well he was going to get his giant battery plant finished in time.

Otherwise, he wouldn’t have made his “bet”. Musk did not get to be worth nearly $20 billion taking $50 million gambles – even if it is true that when you’re as rich as him $50 million counts as small change. No, he got rich at least in part thanks to his remarkable ability to talk the hind legs off a donkey.

In this case, he persuaded pretty much the entirety of the world’s media that when a businessman makes a deal in which a project has to be completed within a certain time frame this isn’t called “fulfilling your most basic job requirements” but “winning an incredible bet.”

Obvious Truth #2. South Australia needs Elon Musk and his giant battery like it needs a Taipan in the dunny.

That’s because, as Paul Homewood has been impolite enough to notice, the battery will make next to no difference to South Australia’s massive energy problem.

South Australia, you’ll recall, has been experiencing the kind of blackouts and brownouts you’d never imagine could be possible in a first-world economy in the early 21st century. These have been caused entirely by its left-wing government’s obsession with “green” energy.

Will Musk’s giant battery – actually not one giant battery but a bank of lots of smaller batteries – supply the shortfall?

Nope.

Homewood does the math:

The battery is rated at 129 MWh.

Currently, generation in South Australia is running at 1878 MW, so the Tesla battery could only run the grid for 4 minutes.

Alternatively, according to Tesla, it could power 2500 homes for a whole day, or 15000 for four hours.

Given that there are 673,000 households in South Australia, the Tesla battery is an expensive irrelevance.

Australia, by the way, is a large island consisting underground of almost nothing but fossil fuels and other useful mineral deposits. The idea that it should be powering itself using bat-chomping, bird-slicing eco-crucifixes and then trying to store some of their excess power in lithium batteries quite defies belief.

Here, again courtesy of Paul Homewood, is the chart that puts this lunacy into perspective:

There’s coal, still providing 73 percent of Australia’s electricity, with gas providing another 14 percent. Wind power, meanwhile, provides just 3 percent.

So if you’re Australian and you drive a Tesla there’s something you ought to know: you’re driving a mostly coal-powered vehicle.

Read more at Breitbart

  • Truth
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Gettr
  • Threads
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Mastodon
  • Buffer
  • Telegram
  • Email
  • Copy Link
  • Share Using More Networks…

Popular Posts

Electric Vehicles (EVs)

The ‘Green’ Scam Of The Century: How ‘Renewables’ Increase Fossil Fuel Demands

Oct 23, 2024
News and Opinion

Antarctica Is Colder, Icier Today Than At Any Time In 5,000 Years

Apr 15, 2024
Energy

30-Plus Signs That The Climate Scam Is Collapsing

Apr 09, 2025

Comments 5

  1. Spurwing Plover says:
    8 years ago

    Just like Al Bore Elon Musk is a Con-Man and Snake Oil Salesman

  2. Don says:
    8 years ago

    An insanely ignorant article .. with all the advances in technology coming up in the near future only an idiot would blow billions on new power plants when far better and newer technologies are just up the road. Best to spend only a few hundred million dollars and hold off for a while instead of wasting billions of the people’s money on things which will soon be replaced anyway. Easy enough to be a Monday morning referee when it’s not your money being spent.

  3. Smedry says:
    8 years ago

    I can’t believe the insanity of this article. The battery is designed to allow the wind power in Australia (4% of total production) to supply power to the grid whenever needed and not just when the wind is blowing. Remember, Electricity is usually a commodity that MUST be generated and consumed at the same time. This battery bank allows for generation at a different time than consumption. Even a few percentage points of additional capacity being available on demand can make the difference between stable power and a black out.
    Additionally, according to the article, only 4%of power is currently wind generated and the battery has a capacity of about 6% of the power grid. Since Wind is the only significant electricity producer that cannot be turned on and off on demand, the battery only needs to be big enough to store the energy from wind production (not from the coal and natural gas production) in order for it to have a significant impact on the power grid.
    Next time, think before mixing irrelevant information into an article. It only makes you look bad.

  4. Squidly says:
    8 years ago

    Elon Musk is nothing more than a $billionaire con artist!

  5. Spurwing Plover says:
    8 years ago

    Just selling his snake oil to the Aussies just like Al Bore with us here in the States

Stay Connected On Social Media

gab-logo

Donate Today

Beating back the alarmist narrative takes time and money. Please donate today to help!

Recent Posts

  • newsom high pricesClimate Policy, Not Climate Change, Is Pricing Californians Out
    Dec 31, 2025
    California’s soaring housing and energy costs are being driven by climate and energy policies, not by modest changes in temperature. […]
  • World in EU chainsTo Kick Off 2026, Europe Moves To Silence Climate Dissent
    Dec 31, 2025
    As the EU's climate narrative collapses, desperate leaders are planning more tyrannical measures to keep it all from sinking. […]
  • protest climate system change17 Attorneys General Take On Climate Cartel, Warn of Radical ESG Tactics
    Dec 31, 2025
    17 AGs warn the activist group "As You Sow" to stop pushing net-zero policies that violate antitrust laws and drain Americans’ wallets. […]
  • gavel earth lawsuits2025 Year In Review: Courtroom Losses Mount For Climate Lawfare
    Dec 31, 2025
    In 2025, climate lawfare faced repeated courtroom defeats, leaving litigants and industry alike awaiting a pivotal SCOTUS decision in 2026. […]
  • Offshore wind farmOffshore Wind Produces Far Less Energy Than Governments Projected, Study Finds
    Dec 30, 2025
    Study finds offshore wind farms could produce far less energy than projected, risking gaps in carbon-free electricity targets. […]
  • YCC photo essay nopeMeteorologist: Dramatic Disaster Photos Don’t Prove Climate Change
    Dec 30, 2025
    A meteorologist explains why dramatic disaster photos — not long-term data — are being used to sell climate claims. […]
  • power plant nat gasEx-FERC Official Warns DOE’s Data Center Plan Threatens Grid Reliability
    Dec 30, 2025
    Ex-FERC official warns DOE’s data center plan could threaten grid reliability and strip states of control over power and costs. […]
  • earth satelliteNew Study Shows 125 Years Of Warming And Cooling Trends Don’t Match CO2 Emissions
    Dec 30, 2025
    New analysis finds global warming was more pronounced from 1899 to 1940 than from 1983 to 2024 despite lower CO2 emissions. […]
  • warwick battery farm fireBlakeman Warns Hochul’s ‘Toxic’ Battery-Farm Mandates Will Put New Yorkers At Risk
    Dec 30, 2025
    Blakeman warns Hochul’s ‘toxic’ battery-farm mandates put New Yorkers at risk from dangerous lithium-ion fires. […]
  • Gavin Newsom Sao PaoloBlue States Are Choosing High Electricity Prices Through Costly Green Mandates
    Dec 30, 2025
    Blue state climate mandates, not Washington, are driving up electricity costs for residents. […]

Get Instant Email Notifications

Subscribe to receive a digest of daily stories, or get emailed once they're published. Check your Junk/Spam folder for a verification email.

Submit a tip

Please enter your email, so we know you're human.

Books You May Like

exposing great lie

Have a suggestion? Let us know! We swap out books based on your input. We participate in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. See here.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us

© Portions copyright Climate Change Dispatch

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Climate Change Dispatch

 
Share via
  • Facebook
  • Like
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Digg
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky
Share via
  • Digg
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky