“Over the past decades, atoll islands exhibited no widespread sign of physical destabilization in the face of sea-level rise.
“88.6% of islands were either stable or increased in area, while only 11.4% contracted.
“It is noteworthy that no island larger than 10 ha decreased in size.
These results show that atoll and island areal stability is a global trend, whatever the rate of sea-level rise.”- Duvat, 2019
Image Sources: Donchyts et al., 2016 and BBC (press release)
I. Despite sea level rise, “the coasts are growing all over the world”
Sea levels aren’t rising fast enough to deleteriously affect coastal areas on a net global scale.
Satellite observations indicate there have been 13,565 km2 of net growth in the land area across the globe’s coasts between 1985-2015.
In other words, the Earth’s coasts gained more land area then were lost to rising sea levels.
“Earth’s surface gained 115,000 km2 of water and 173,000 km2 of land over the past 30 years, including 20,135 km2 of water and 33,700 km2 of land in coastal areas.” (Donchyts et al., 2016)
As a visual example, Ahmed et al. (2018) find that Bangladesh’s coastal land area grew by 7.9 km2 per year during 1985-2015.
“This paper draws upon the application of GIS and remote sensing techniques to investigate the dynamic nature and management aspects of land in the coastal areas of Bangladesh. … This research reveals that the rate of accretion [coastal land growth] in the study area is slightly higher than the rate of erosion. Overall land dynamics indicate a net gain of 237 km2 (7.9 km2annual average) of land in the area for the whole period from 1985 to 2015.” (Ahmed et al., 2018)
Image Source: Ahmed et al., 2018
II. Even with ~4 mm yr−1 local sea level rise, Pacific islands grew in size during 1971-2014
Between 1958-2014, the globe’s sea levels rose at a rate of about 1.4 mm yr−1 , or 14 centimeters (5.5 inches) per century (Frederikse et al., 2018).
Ice melt from Greenland and Antarctica contributed a grand total of 1.5 cm of the 7.9 cm (3.1 inches) of sea level rise during those 56 years.
“The global-mean sea level reconstruction shows a trend of 1.5 ± 0.2 mm yr−1 over 1958–2014 (1σ), compared to 1.3 ± 0.1 mm yr−1 for the sum of contributors.” (Frederikse et al., 2018)
However, there are regions of the world where sea levels are rising at rates two or three times the global average.
Tuvalu, representing over 100 islands located in the central west Pacific, has undergone “twice the global average” rate of sea level rise (~3.90 ± 0.4 mm yr−1) since the 1970s.
It would be expected that such high rates of local sea level change would result in shrinking island coasts and overall land area during this period.
But the opposite has occurred. There has been a net increase in the coastal land area of Tuvalu between 1971-2014 in 8 of 9 atolls.
“We specifically examine spatial differences in island behaviour, of all 101 islands in Tuvalu, over the past four decades (1971–2014), a period in which local sea level has risen at twice the global average. Surprisingly, we show that all islands have changed and that the dominant mode of change has been island expansion, which has increased the land area of the nation.”
“Using remotely sensed data, change is analysed over the past four decades, a period when local sea level has risen at twice the global average (~3.90 ± 0.4 mm yr−1). Results highlight a net increase in land area in Tuvalu of 73.5 ha (2.9%), despite sea-level rise, and land area increase in eight of nine atolls.” (Kench et al., 2018)
III. The stability or coastal net growth of islands in recent decades to century “is a global trend”
Coastal stability and expansion for atoll and island land area is not just a regional trend, but a global one.
A comprehensive (709 islands) review of coastal changes that have been observed in the last decades to this century (Duvat, 2019) reveals that no atoll island destabilization has occurred due to the effects of rising sea levels.
In fact, 88.6% of the globe’s islands have coasts that are either stable or expanding in size.
Further, not a single island larger than 10 hectares [1 ha = 10,000 square m, or 2.5 acres] has decreased in size in recent decades.
None of these observed trends affirm the popularized claim that modern sea level rise is currently threatening the globe’s coasts.
Read rest at No Tricks Zone
https://www.foxnews.com/category/science/planet-earth/climate
It’s a new year. “New research finds”…. “scientists say”…. fake news cycle heating up again.
“Earth’s tilt may exacerbate a melting Antarctic”
“The tilt matters for when and where sunlight hits the globe, and can thus influence climate”
Really? Yes. BUT….
“It’s not entirely clear why this change in sensitivity to obliquity occurs, Levy told Live Science,”? “The tilt” Levy. Remember the tilt???
“The last time in Earth’s geologic history that carbon dioxide was this high, there was no year-round sea ice in Antarctica, Levy said. Well, it had to be warm too Levy.
But does Levy know CO2 levels FOLLOWED THE NATURAL CYCLICAL WARMING caused by obliquity? Yes, but there is the agenda.
What happened to “tilt matters”??? The agenda of course.
If emissions continue as they are, the sea ice will falter, Levy said, “and we will jump back to a world that hasn’t existed for millions of years.”
“we will jump back to a world that hasn’t existed for millions of years.” Jump back!? Like how? Do 97% of scientists now consider global time travel possible?
“we will jump back to a world that hasn’t existed for millions of years.”What a silly thing for a scientist to say.
Oh wait! They found a message…. The researchers are now looking into the small variations in sensitivity to Earth’s tilt that occur across the three broad (historical) patterns that they found, but (BUT) THE MAIN MESSAGE IS ALREADY CLEAR, Levy said. The small variations in sensitivity to Earth’s tilt just are not consistent with the agenda.
AND “Antarctic sea ice is clearly important,” he said. Well ya! Solid, liquid or vapor, water is important.
“We need to push (the agenda) on and figure out ways to meet emissions targets.” Push where?? What IS the target? CO2 levels are at a historical high since we have been measuring CO2…. the past 60 years….. come on back in 600,000 years and let us know if you found the target.
1800-1870 – Level of carbon dioxide gas (CO2) in the atmosphere, as later measured in ancient ice, is about 290 ppm (parts per million). Mean global temperature (1850-1890) is roughly 13.7°C.
2016 – Level of carbon dioxide gas (CO2) in the atmosphere is 403.3. The global mean temperature for 2016 is 14.0.84 °C, according to the Met Office annual global temperature forecast.
ROUGHLY – a 1 °C Mean global temperature increase over 126 years.
SO…….
Does a 1 °C Mean global temperature increase over 126 years result in a CO2 level increase of 113.3 ppm?
Or, does a CO2 level increase of 38.9655 % over 126 years cause a Mean global temperature increase of 1 °C?
Answered……………..
“Frédéric Parrenin of the Laboratory of Glaciology and Geophysical Environment in France and a team of researchers may have found an answer to the question. His team compiled an extensive record of Antarctic temperatures and CO2 data from existing data and five ice cores drilled in the Antarctic interior over the last 30 years. Their results, published February 28 in Science, show CO2 lagged temperature by less than 200 years, drastically decreasing the amount of uncertainty in previous estimates.”
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/ice-core-data-help-solve/
“This correlation shows that CO2 and CH4 are controlled by temperature and so provides no evidence for CO2 or CH4 amplifying temperature signals that are linked to orbital cycles.”
http://euanmearns.com/the-vostok-ice-core-temperature-co2-and-ch4/
Wow, great news, we had heard a little of this recently. I wonder will the Communists take this hymn out of their song book or will it be same old yada, yada, yada
Still paying out way too much for fake data and sloppy research