• Privacy Policy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
Climate Change Dispatch
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
Climate Change Dispatch
No Result
View All Result

Developing Nations May Sink Boris Johnson’s Net Zero Dreams

by Aynsley Kellow
November 01, 2021, 8:19 AM
in News and Opinion
Reading Time: 6 mins read
A A
0

cop26 net zero protestThe portents are not good for Boris Johnson. COP-26 appears to be in as big a mess as his hair.

The news overnight from the G20 leaders’ forum in Rome has been a less than overwhelming endorsement of “Net Zero by 2050.”

In the official Communique, the objective remains but the target date is becoming fuzzier:

In this endeavor, informed by the IPCC assessments, we will accelerate our actions across mitigation, adaptation, and finance, acknowledging the key relevance of achieving global net-zero greenhouse gas emissions or carbon neutrality by or around mid-century and the need to strengthen global efforts required to reach the goals of the Paris Agreement (see here).

Johnson has worked hard on the objective of “Net Zero by 2050” and commitments for higher Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs), but already people are referring to the Glasgow climate summit as “FLOP26”.

Usually, the outcome of such summits is only decided at not even the eleventh hour, but the thirteenth hour, when sleep-deprived delegates do what they can to reach an agreement before their hotel bookings expire and their private jets turn into pumpkins. This time they start with Halloween.

It is clear that any kind of positive outcome for Johnson will depend on substantial progress being made on three issues: delivery on the $100 billion commitment, recognition of the importance of historical (rather than current) emissions, and adaptation to climate change.

It will take some time before the negotiations take shape, after the formalities like the adoption of the agenda, the election of the chair, and so on. And before they get to Net Zero and NDCs, they must deal with the important question of finance.

The clear trade-off is that the developing countries will only agree to a mitigation deal if they benefit from a financial reward while making little by way of mitigation commitments themselves.

Fundamentally, this will not go very far without interests being satisfied. The dictates of ‘The Science’ will not be enough.

Sure enough, there has been the usual production of scary science suitable for a Halloween event, with the IPCC producing its latest Assessment Report in time to impact parties’ thinking, but it has quickly been exposed by dissident scientists in not one but two useful collations, by Judith Curry [Read here] and Clintel/ICSF [Read here], respectively.

Their analyses show how the authors of the Summary for Policy Makers exaggerated the actual consensus findings of scientists which can be found in the body of the Report. This has the effect of exaggerating the threat and accentuating human causation.

Boris himself has been caught out attempting to minimize the cost of his own efforts, underestimating the cost of the many offshore wind farms he is banking on and assuming that 2050 will be much windier than the present – and not just the recent past with its ‘wind drought’ that has contributed to Europe’s energy crisis.

Johnson has sought to provide leadership, but his problem is other important leaders like Xi Jinping and Vladimir Putin have given attending Glasgow a pass, and Joe Biden arrives with a huge credibility problem because Congress has not passed the enormous appropriations bill that might fund his plans to get anywhere close to a 50% reduction.

He can make all kinds of promises, but everyone will doubt whether he can deliver on them — especially because the Paris Agreement rests on an Executive Order in the US, rather than being a treaty ratified by the Senate, and a future president might (again) withdraw the USA.

But the key is the response of developing countries. The developed countries (listed in Annexe 1 of the Convention) have already reduced, slightly, their collective emissions, partly by relocating emissions-intensive industries to China.

Thus, what China does with its current 27% of global emissions is seen to be of paramount importance — although India has an equivalent population but is running behind China on the development curve and, like much of Asia and Africa, is unlikely to forgo opportunities for development.

Indeed, in preparation for Glasgow, a virtual meeting of ministers of the 24 members of the Like-Minded Developing Countries (LMDC) — which includes China, India, Egypt, Indonesia, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, and Vietnam — accused rich nations of failing to address their historic responsibility for causing climate change and shifting the burden on developing economies.

They issued a strong rebuke for the UK host for attempting to impose a Net Zero goal on them, which they considered to be ‘shifting the goal posts’ of the Paris Agreement.

The Ministerial statement considered that ‘This new goal which is being advanced runs counter to the Paris Agreement and is anti-equity and against climate justice.’

The LMDCs are pressing two important items. The first is delivery on the promise by the developed countries of $100 billion per year in climate assistance first raised at Copenhagen and included in the Paris Agreement for delivery by 2020.

This has fallen short by about $20 billion and the deadline has been extended to 2025, but the process has also lacked transparency, especially with the EU, which has also been accused of redirecting traditional development assistance rather than providing additional funds.

The developing countries are also pressing on the issue that the accumulation of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere reflects historical aggregate emissions, rather than annual emissions.

They argue the global policy response should reflect the historical responsibilities of states for using the available atmospheric “budget”.

They point out that China (the largest current emitter) and India (the fourth largest) have only recently begun to emit CO2 as they have industrialized, and that since 1750 the US is responsible for about 25% of all emissions, and the EU for 22%.

Also on the agenda is the issue of climate adaptation. Green NGOs worked hard to confine priorities to mitigation, but the need for the development of resilience regardless of mitigation is apparent to the developing countries.

In 2019, the African Group requested (unsuccessfully) a new agenda item on the Global Goal on Adaptation, which is enshrined in the Paris Agreement. Adaptation also features quite heavily on the draft COP Agenda.

It is clear that any kind of positive outcome for Johnson will depend on substantial progress being made on these issues. The ability of small, seemingly powerless states to influence outcomes should not be underestimated.

The Alliance of Small Island States managed to scare delegates with visions of islands sinking beneath rising sea levels, to secure the aspirational 1.5°C goal in the Paris Agreement (even though there is strong scientific evidence that their coral atolls are, as Darwin observed, growing rather than shrinking in size) – and that goal now features prominently in the climate change discourse.

(As I discussed in an earlier article for this Bulletin, that is a target of 1.5°C above preindustrial temperatures, and we have already seen almost 1.2°C of that.

Finance for developing countries, recognition of cumulative emissions, and adaptation are the three key issues being championed by the 24 states of the Like-Minded Developing Countries.

As this includes the two most populous countries which are among the four largest emitters, they will have a significant influence on the outcome. This may cause the end of Boris Johnson’s dreams of glory at Glasgow.

Read more at Climate Change The Facts

  • Truth
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Gettr
  • Threads
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Mastodon
  • Buffer
  • Telegram
  • Email
  • Copy Link
  • Share Using More Networks…

Popular Posts

Electric Vehicles (EVs)

The ‘Green’ Scam Of The Century: How ‘Renewables’ Increase Fossil Fuel Demands

Oct 23, 2024
News and Opinion

Antarctica Is Colder, Icier Today Than At Any Time In 5,000 Years

Apr 15, 2024
Energy

30-Plus Signs That The Climate Scam Is Collapsing

Apr 09, 2025

Comments are welcome! Those that add no discussion value may be removed.Cancel reply

Stay Connected On Social Media

gab-logo

Donate Today

Beating back the alarmist narrative takes time and money. Please donate today to help!

Recent Posts

  • oil rig drillAmerica’s Energy Boom Exposes The Folly Of Britain’s Net Zero Disaster
    Oct 3, 2025
    America’s energy boom and policy flexibility are widening the economic gap with Britain, where high prices and net zero goals are stalling growth. […]
  • Arctic sunsetNew Study Shows Arctic Sea Ice Decline Slowing, Driven More by Natural Variability Than Emissions
    Oct 3, 2025
    New study shows Arctic sea ice decline has slowed since 2012, driven more by natural variability than greenhouse gas emissions. […]
  • Attorney General Rob BontaNewsom Backs Off Climate Fight As AG Bonta Doubles Down On Suing Energy Firms
    Oct 3, 2025
    Two years after launching a high-profile climate lawsuit, Newsom is backing off while AG Rob Bonta doubles down on lawfare against major energy firms. […]
  • Farm irrigationMeteorologist Debunks Reuters’ Claim That Climate Change Threatens Europe’s Resources
    Oct 2, 2025
    Data show Europe’s droughts, weather, and biodiversity issues stem from mismanagement, not climate change, despite alarmist media claims. […]
  • Russ VoughtTrump Nixes $8B In ‘Green New Scam Funding’ In NYC, Blue States
    Oct 2, 2025
    Trump DOE halted billions in green energy projects citing poor economics, DEI hiring, and weak energy impact, sparking backlash in blue states. […]
  • SherrillRising Energy Costs And Dem Green Policies Top Of Mind In NJ Gubernatorial Race
    Oct 2, 2025
    New Jersey voters face rising energy costs as Democratic green policies and offshore wind expansion drive utility bills higher. […]
  • Hochul's green stringsHochul’s Election-Year ‘Inflation Refund’ Checks Can’t Cover Costs Of Her Green Agenda
    Oct 2, 2025
    Hochul’s election-year ‘inflation refund’ checks won’t offset the soaring living costs and utility hikes her green-energy agenda created. […]
  • South Asia monsoonSouth Asia Monsoons Not Becoming More Dangerous From Climate Change, Data Confirms
    Oct 1, 2025
    Claims that climate change is making South Asia’s monsoons more extreme ignore history, data, and other major causes of flooding. […]
  • wildfire carsRick Scott Wants Answers On What California Did With Federal Wildfire Funds
    Oct 1, 2025
    Sen. Rick Scott is demanding answers on how California spent federal money earmarked for preventing and fighting wildfires. […]
  • Biden test driving an all-electric Ford F-150.Ford CEO Warns U.S. EV Sales Could Halve After Federal Subsidies End
    Oct 1, 2025
    Ford warns U.S. electric vehicle sales could drop as much as 5% after the $7,500 taxpayer-funded federal subsidies expire in a month. […]

Get Instant Email Notifications

Subscribe to receive a digest of daily stories, or get emailed once they're published. Check your Junk/Spam folder for a verification email.

Submit a tip

Please enter your email, so we know you're human.

Books You May Like

very convenient warming

exposing great lie

Have a suggestion? Let us know! We swap out books based on your input. We participate in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. See here.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us

© Portions copyright Climate Change Dispatch

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us

© 2025 Climate Change Dispatch

Share via
  • Facebook
  • Like
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Digg
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky
Share via
  • Digg
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky