Four decades ago, the movie Star Wars was released and the first Apple II computer went on sale. That same year, 1977, newly-inaugurated President Carter established the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) in an attempt to launch a government-inspired tech revolution in energy.
…snip…
Give Carter credit for an enduring legacy in at least this regard: that speech’s “10 fundamental principles” have anchored all energy policies since. …snip…
And DOE’s 40-year mission? It has been almost entirely focused on reducing the use of or trying to completely replace oil and gas. That mission remains the same today, although the motives have changed.
After all these decades of government programs consuming some $500 billion in that pursuit, what’s happened?
America uses 140 percent more oil for transportation today than it did in 1977. Electricity consumption is up 200 percent. (The recent slow growth in power demand looks a lot like a recession effect: we’ll soon know for sure when the economy fully recovers.) Lavishly subsidized biofuels have grown from an irrelevant 0.25 percent in 1977 to an unremarkable 5 percent share of transportation energy use today. Solar power rose from essentially zero, back then, to today’s irrelevant 0.15 percent share of U.S. energy. Wind power has been the biggest success: but even those heavily subsidized turbines now supply only 1.5 percent of America’s energy.
The fundamental energy sources available to power society have remained unchanged not just since 1977 but since 1957. Politicians and pundits often intone that there are “a multitude” of new energy options, but that’s rhetorical hyperbole. There is no new physics in energy nor new energy sources, just better ways to use those that exist.
The most remarkable and unpredicted energy tech change didn’t come from DOE or the super-major oil companies. Thousands of small and mid-sized companies perfected new shale oil & gas technologies and transformed the landscape.
Shale tech has added 2,000 percent more to U.S. energy supply in the past decade than solar and wind combined. That’s the fastest and biggest addition to world energy supply—not just hydrocarbons, but all forms of energy—that has occurred in history. The only time something nearly as dramatic occurred was in the decade following the 1968 opening of Saudi Arabia’s giant Ghawar oil field. America is, after a 40-year hiatus, exporting crude oil again.
Despite these lessons from history, many policymakers continue to exhibit an “irrational exuberance” in their aspirational goals to replace oil and gas. The rhetoric is as apocalyptic today as in 1977; this time because of worries about global warming. But for the physics of energy, that’s a distinction without a difference. And the reality is that now, with the maturation of cloud and sensor tech, the digital revolution will advance oil and gas at a rate faster than it will alternative energy tech.
There is one other transformation since 1977. America is now far more dependent on electricity. Back then, electricity accounted for 39 percent of all non-transportation energy use. Today that share has risen to 55 percent. This has happened in large measure because of a new trillion-dollar computing and communications infrastructure, one that requires a uniquely reliable and always-on electric grid.
…snip…
And the overall policy lessons on this 40th anniversary? Energy revolutions don’t emerge from top-down manifestos. Of course, new science will emerge one day. But accelerating that day will only come from supporting basic research, not policies and subsidies focused on yesterday’s technologies.
The $500 billion waste of money only happens when society has a no limit credit card .
When the music stops core services get rationalized and throwing borrowed money at bird blenders will be over . Till then the only hope is Mr. Trumps team cutting waste , duplicity, and government subsidies to rent seekers .
Providing for the facts that demac-RATS always install radical eco-wackos in key spots in the Goverment just like Bill Clinton having Bruce(Babbling)Babbit as his Interior Secretary and Babbit belonged to the liberal Legal of Conservation Voters