• Privacy Policy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
Climate Change Dispatch
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
Climate Change Dispatch
No Result
View All Result

Dems’ War On Fracking Will Cost Them In Swing States

by Stephen Moore
January 24, 2020, 11:37 AM
in News and Opinion
Reading Time: 2 mins read
A A
8

cnn debate january 2020Most presidential campaigns feature a familiar refrain: Each candidate promises to create millions of new jobs.

The 2020 primaries are unusual in that nearly all the Democratic candidates, including Joe Biden, Elizabeth Warren, Bernie Sanders, and Michael Bloomberg are solemnly pledging to destroy millions of jobs by ending the shale oil and gas revolution.

The Democrats’ war on fossil fuels was on full display at the debate in Los Angeles last month, where Joe Biden, the supposed moderate, was asked if he would rein in America’s shale oil and gas production even if it meant “thousands, maybe hundreds of thousands” would lose their jobs.

He unhesitatingly responded “yes,” to cheers from the audience of college students and professors.

He then recited the familiar liberal riff about how investment in wind and solar power will save the economy. (Soon afterward he told a New Hampshire audience that unemployed energy workers should “learn how to program.”)

The gaffe evokes the moment in 1984 when Walter Mondale pledged during a presidential debate with President Reagan that he would raise everyone’s taxes. Mr. Mondale went on to win one state and the District of Columbia.

Curtailing U.S. oil and gas production would be economically disastrous. At least $1 trillion of U.S. economic output is related to the shale revolution, and more than 1.5 million Americans are employed in the industry.

A PricewaterhouseCoopers study for the American Petroleum Institute found that at least four million American jobs are tied to the shale oil and gas revolution in areas like auto production, construction, petroleum engineering, pipe fitting, service stations, steel production, and trucking.

Democrats’ quest to eliminate these jobs would hurt them in the swing states they’ll need to win to unseat President Trump.

Ohio and Michigan have a combined total of more than 400,000 workers in the shale industry. Pennsylvania has another 320,000. Colorado and Florida each have more than 200,000 workers in oil and gas.

Read rest at WSJ

  • Truth
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Gettr
  • Threads
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Mastodon
  • Buffer
  • Telegram
  • Email
  • Copy Link
  • Share Using More Networks…

Popular Posts

Electric Vehicles (EVs)

The ‘Green’ Scam Of The Century: How ‘Renewables’ Increase Fossil Fuel Demands

Oct 23, 2024
News and Opinion

Antarctica Is Colder, Icier Today Than At Any Time In 5,000 Years

Apr 15, 2024
Energy

30-Plus Signs That The Climate Scam Is Collapsing

Apr 09, 2025

Comments 8

  1. Spurwing Plover says:
    6 years ago

    Behind those little Podiums those democrats remind me of a Game Show lets just call it ROBBER BARONS

  2. David Lewis says:
    6 years ago

    By saying “learn how to program” Biden might as well be telling fossil fuel workers to F*** Off. My son is software engineer and I’m very familiar with the profession. Many people just do not have the mental ability to do that kind of work. Learning how to program would mean taking on tens of thousands of dollars of dept and would take time. Fossil fuel professionals don’t have that time. They have to make mortgage payments and buy food for their families right now.

  3. Spurwing Plover says:
    6 years ago

    Right off the cliff run the democrat Lemmings the gulls and sharks will feast

  4. James Williams says:
    6 years ago

    “Right now, there are over TWO DOZEN peer reviewed scientific studies prepared by reputable universities & government agencies over the past 10 years that all have the same top line findings.”
    I agree with you that there is no credible evidence. Could you please provide references to these studies?

    • Randy Verret says:
      6 years ago

      For “googling” purposes, on the agency side, I’d suggest these:
      U.S EPA Comprehensive Groundwater Study (2016), Wyoming DEQ- Pavillion Report, USGS Study of Fayetteville & Haynesville Shales & Colorado Oil & Gas Commission “White Paper” on Gasland findings (2012?). Amongst the University studies, you have U. of Texas Austin (2015?), Yale University, Duke University & U. of Cincinnati (NRDC funded) which all cover Marcellus are 2016-17 vintage, as I recall. Another is Penn State, which I believe was last year. That Penn State study included 11,000 water samples in western PA as part of the analysis, the most extensive I have seen. I think that covers some of the major ones…

    • Randy Verret says:
      6 years ago

      For any interested readers, I believe you can find a list of groundwater studies at http://www.ipaa.org/fracking. There is plenty of legitimate scientific data out there and the vast majority of it does not support the environmental NGO’s claims.

  5. Randy Verret says:
    6 years ago

    What I learned, early on, during my (former) career as a regulatory operative in the oil & gas industry is that you cannot rebut an environmental extremist position with an economic argument. So, the folks who are proposing to ban fracing and collapse domestic oil & gas production don’t really CARE how many jobs are lost or how much economic opportunity are destroyed. Instead, you have to defeat their FALSE narrative. Right now, there are over TWO DOZEN peer reviewed scientific studies prepared by reputable universities & government agencies over the past 10 years that all have the same top line findings. That is: There is no creditable evidence that fracing has caused systematic groundwater contamination. PERIOD. Not ONE of these studies, to my knowledge, has been refuted by ANY environmental activist group. Scoreboard! This has to be one of the most intensely studied industrial processes in U.S history. The MOUNTAIN of evidence clearly supports it as a safe & well regulated process. Just FACT. Even Obama’s EPA in their 2016 comprehensive study agrees. These Democratic candidates need to start having their staffers do some independent research and STOP buying into the environmental NGO propaganda campaign. Energy policy is too important to be guided by these extremists who understand little about energy imperatives & attendant environmental protection. The debate, somehow, needs to drastically change…

  6. JPS says:
    6 years ago

    The dems are wiping themselves of the face of the planet.. their plan is nothing less then economical suicide and kicking humanity back to the middle ages..

Stay Connected!

gab-logo

Donate Today

Beating back the alarmist narrative takes time and money. Please donate today to help!

Get notified when new posts are published!

Subscribe to receive a digest of daily stories, or get emailed once they're published. Check your Junk/Spam folder for a verification email.

Recent Posts

  • supreme court buildingSCOTUS To Hear Climate Lawsuit That Could Cost Consumers Billions
    Feb 24, 2026
    The Supreme Court will decide whether state courts can impose climate damages on oil companies, a ruling that could affect consumers nationwide. […]
  • electric car house fireElectric Car Fire In Germany Renews Safety Concerns Over EV Battery Risks
    Feb 24, 2026
    A charging station blaze in Schwaigern reignites debate over ferry bans, parking garage restrictions, and lithium-ion battery fire risks. […]
  • nyt EF headlineNYT Cries ‘End Of Science’ After Trump EPA Scraps Obama-Era Endangerment Finding
    Feb 23, 2026
    NYT claims Trump erased government climate authority after EPA scraps Obama-era endangerment finding critics say lacked legal and scientific basis. […]
  • HawaiiActual Honolulu Tide Gauge Data Undercuts Disastrous Sea Level Rise Claims
    Feb 23, 2026
    Honolulu tide gauge data show modest sea level rise, undercutting catastrophic claims built on global satellite averages and public perception. […]
  • supreme court protestClimate Alarmists Howl After EPA Rescinds ‘Endangerment Finding’
    Feb 23, 2026
    EPA rescinds the 2009 Endangerment Finding, prompting immediate lawsuits and fierce backlash from climate activists. […]
  • burning moneyThe $16 Trillion Climate Tab — And The Poor Got Left In The Dark
    Feb 20, 2026
    Bjorn Lomborg says $16 trillion in climate spending delivered no measurable results while energy poverty and preventable deaths persisted. […]
  • school bus yellowEPA Moves To Overhaul Biden-Era Clean School Bus Program After Safety Failures
    Feb 20, 2026
    EPA seeks reforms to Biden-era Clean School Bus Program after electric buses bought with tax dollars proved unreliable and unsafe. […]
  • india coal miningIndia Doubles Down On Coal And Natural Gas As Climate Goals Recede
    Feb 20, 2026
    India expands coal power and deepens U.S. LNG trade while pushing net-zero to 2070, signaling where global energy policy is really headed. […]
  • miliband newsomCalifornia’s Crippling Electricity Prices Undercut Miliband’s Deal With Newsom
    Feb 20, 2026
    California’s sky-high electricity prices are fueling backlash as critics question Miliband’s climate deal with Gavin Newsom. […]
  • colorado sun headline$37 Billion Climate Cost Claim For Colorado Collapses Under Scrutiny
    Feb 19, 2026
    A widely cited study claiming $37 billion in climate costs for Colorado collapses under scrutiny when real-world data are examined. […]

Submit a tip

Please enter your email, so we know you're human.

Books You May Like

Climate prn book

exposing great lie

Have a suggestion? Let us know! We swap out books based on your input. We participate in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. See here.

  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA Policy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us

© Portions copyright Climate Change Dispatch

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Climate Change Dispatch

 
Share via
  • Facebook
  • Like
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Digg
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky
Share via
  • Digg
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky