
Your electricity bill reveals a stark political divide: Red-state residents pay less, while blue states gouge their citizens and businesses with exorbitant electric rates. [emphasis, links added]
But even worse are the bald-faced lies of blue-state politicians who defend the gouging.
Instead of admitting that expensive electricity is a choice they’re deliberately making — your budget be damned — they constantly claim wind and solar power are “affordable” and “reliable.”
The shameless gaslighting was on full display last week, after President Donald Trump’s Interior Department paused offshore wind farm construction along the East Coast near Virginia, New York, Connecticut, and Rhode Island.
The administration claims the huge installations obscure radar detection of potential foreign incursions, threatening “east coast population centers.”
Within minutes, Connecticut Gov. Ned Lamont accused Trump of “making things up.”
Gov. Kathy Hochul called the pause “B.S. “
I’ve lived in New England for 20 years now, and I am still stunned by my neighbors tolerance of electricity bills twice as high as most of America. It’s an entirely self-inflicted economic injury.
In most of US, these rates would mean it’s “torches and pitchforks” time. pic.twitter.com/mAPuXWYlec
— ConservativeNotCrazy (@IAMMGraham) December 30, 2025
Maybe. The announcement was short on evidence backing up the administration’s security pretext.
But the possible deception on Trump’s part is mild compared to the lies spewed by Democrats in response.
Hochul declared wind power will “keep energy costs down” and “strengthen reliability.”
Connecticut Attorney General William Tong insisted wind power will save ratepayers “hundreds of millions of dollars.”
Lamont claimed a “diverse energy supply,” which includes wind, “will lower utility costs for families.”
Nonsense. In fact, worse than nonsense. Deliberate lying.
Each state has the authority to decide the mix of energy sources that go into its electric grid.
You’re full if it.
Then why do wind turbines rely on gov’t subsidies?
Wind produces very expensive electricity.
Countries that abandoned conventional electric power & rely on electricity from wind & solar have electric rates over 2 to 3 times that of America. #GreenScam pic.twitter.com/0zN27Qjfr4— The MAGA Mall (@MallMaga) December 27, 2025
Blue states have mandated ever-increasing reliance on wind, as well as solar, instead of fossil fuels, per the Institute for Energy Research (IER).
New Yorkers pay 58% more for their electricity than the national average due to green mandates imposed by state politicians and the power sources they exclude, such as natural gas fracking.
Connecticut ratepayers are fleeced even more, paying nearly double the national average rate for electricity.
⚡️After billions of dollars wasted, right now at 8:45 am on January 2nd, 2026:
ALL the wind turbines in ALL of New England are contributing only 5.7% of the power to our grid.
Or in other words – only 957 MW of the current system demand of 16,881 MW.
Other contributing… pic.twitter.com/ZJ8D3faVL5
— Reagan Paul (@RepReaganPaul) January 2, 2026
Climate-driven pols, almost all of them Democrats, should at least admit they’re making decisions based on ideology — as well as pressure from the renewable-energy lobby.
Instead, they parrot falsehoods about “affordability” and “reliability.”
In truth, offshore wind power is at least twice as expensive per kilowatt as natural gas-generated electricity, for example.
Bjorn Lomborg of the Copenhagen Consensus, citing data from 70 countries, concludes “the evidence is clear: Adding more solar and wind to the energy supply pushes up the price of electricity.”
How about “reliability,” the other word blue state pols repeat ad nauseam to defend their green obsession?
Germany learned the unreliability of renewables when it installed massive solar and wind generators intended to meet 70% of its grid’s needs.
But on cloudy or windless days, these renewables deliver a mere 4% of the nation’s power demands. Hardly “reliable.”
Germany has had to maintain two generating systems, at massive cost — so Germans pay 43 cents per kilowatt-hour, more than twice what Canadians, who still rely largely on fossil fuels, pay.
Germany’s energy transition in one chart
– Germany’s electricity prices have ~3x’d since 2000
– Renewables now provide ~50% of electricity generation
– Levies, taxes & surcharges account for 75% of pricesThe subsequent deindustrialization was the logical outcome. pic.twitter.com/x2ily9tIaI
— Lukas Ekwueme (@ekwufinance) January 1, 2026
In Britain, Prime Minister Keir Starmer has flip-flopped over whether he will meet or miss his own plans to remove almost all fossil fuels from the UK’s electricity supply by 2030, because the cost is just too high.
He and Energy Secretary Ed Miliband are jostling over whether adding more renewables in the mix will push energy bills to unaffordable levels.
Renewables are budget busters, burdening consumers and slowing economic growth, and they’re learning that the hard way.
California Gov. Gavin Newsom has pushed an increasing reliance on renewables — now up to 39% of its grid’s mix — which is why its residents and businesses pay the second-highest rates in the nation, behind Hawaii.
Those crippling costs are hobbling growth and causing “energy poverty,” with low-income residents unable to pay their electric bills.
Electricity costs were a hot-button issue in New Jersey’s gubernatorial election last year, where bills had skyrocketed because outgoing Gov. Phil Murphy retired fossil-fuel sources just as statewide power demand was soaring.
Hey @SenBooker you have lost your fucking mind! This is the biggest lie you’ve told to date! First off wind is not cheap or affordable & the billions that NJ has thrown away proves that! The failed policy of @GovMurphy in NJ is the reason our energy cost have skyrocket as you sat… https://t.co/OeAOiTCURk
— Edward Durr (@EdTheTruckerNJ) December 30, 2025
Democratic candidate Mikie Sherrill promised that investing in offshore wind would “lower energy costs for families,” a blatant falsehood — but her fib won out.
As Sherrill takes office this month, New Jersey voters should remember her promise — and watch their power bills.
Blue state Americans struggling to pay for electricity need political leaders who will make affordability a priority.
But to do that, voters need to hear the truth.
So far, they’re getting a pack of lies from windbag politicians like Sherrill, Hochul, and Lamont.
Read rest at NY Post

















a 2025 analysis found that the average blue state had a median household income of around $87,000, compared to around $69,000 in the average red state. This represents an income gap of approximately 26%. That more than covers higher electricity bills.
Eight of the ten U.S. states that get the highest percentage of their electricity from wind and solar have average or below average electricity prices.
Based on 2024 and 2025 energy data, the following 10 states lead the U.S. in the percentage of in-state electricity generated from wind and solar power combined:
Iowa: 65% (63% wind, 2% solar)
South Dakota: 61% (primarily wind)
Kansas: 52% (primarily wind)
New Mexico: 50% (rapidly growing solar and wind mix)
Oklahoma: 41% (driven by wind)
Colorado: 40% (mix of wind and solar)
California: 38% (leads the nation in solar at over 25%, plus wind)
North Dakota: 35% (primarily wind)
Maine: 34% (wind and expanding solar)
Nebraska: 33% (primarily wind)
Iowa, South Dakota, Oklahoma. North Dakota and Nebraska currently have Republican governors.
These data falsify the claim that high percentage of electricity from wind and solar have to result in high electricity prices.