The capacity of a modern economy to produce food and products for its citizens, and weapons and fuels for its military to project power, are the undeniable twin pillars of global power.
Both depend on reasonably priced and readily available products made from the oil derivatives manufactured from crude oil. In other words, American literally runs and fights using products made from fossil fuels.
The renewables of wind and solar only generate occasional electricity but manufacture nothing for society.
Take for example the medical industry, which did not exist just a few hundred years ago and is now maintaining the health and well-being of the eight billion now on this planet.
Today, as an exercise in energy literacy, try to identify something, anything in your doctor’s office, the hospital, or the pharmacy that was not made from the oil derivatives manufactured from crude oil.
President Biden has been campaigning for years for the elimination of fossil fuels.
But ridding the world of oil, without a replacement in mind, would be immoral and evil as extreme shortages of the products manufactured from fossil fuels would result in billions of fatalities from diseases, malnutrition, and weather-related deaths.
Shortages of fossil fuel products would necessitate lifestyles being mandated back to the horse and buggy days of the 1800s and could be the greatest threat to the planet’s eight billion residents.
The ruling classes in wealthy countries are not cognizant that the planet populated from one to eight billion in less than 200 years, and that the population explosion began right after the discovery of oil.
That growth in the population was not just based on crude oil by itself, as crude oil is useless until it can be manufactured into something usable.
Today, through human ingenuity, we have more than 6,000 products currently benefiting society and fuel for the 50,000 jets moving people and products, and more than 50,000 merchant ships for global trade flows and the military and space programs.
Sadly, the U.S. is killing fossil-fuel transport pipelines, curtailing permitting refineries and natural gas export facilities, suppressing oil and gas leasing and drilling, and worst of all, stifling longer-term investment in the industry.
Driven by an all-encompassing determination to limit CO2 emissions, Europe, and now America, have declared war on fossil fuels.
Meanwhile, Russia and China burn oil, gas, and coal and emit greenhouse gases at levels that dwarf the West.
QUESTION: Today, how can the ruling class in the few wealthy countries of Germany, Australia, the UK, Canada, and America believe that all the infrastructures and products manufactured from crude oil such as medical, electronics, communications, and the many transportation infrastructures such as airlines, merchant ships, automobiles, trucks, military, and space programs are not needed by future generations?
Ridding the world of fossil fuels would result in a reduction in each of the following, as they all exist because of the products manufactured from crude oil, which cannot be manufactured by either wind or solar:
• The medications and medical equipment at pharmacies and hospitals.
• The 50,000 heavy-weight and long-range merchant ships that are moving products throughout the world.
• The 50,000 heavy-weight and long-range jets used by commercial airlines, private usage, and the military.
• The tires for billions of vehicles.
• The asphalt for the millions of miles of roadways.
• The number of cruise ships that now move twenty-five million passengers around the world.
• The space program.
• The communications systems, including cell phones, computers, iPhones, and iPads.
• The water-filtration systems.
• The sanitation systems.
• The fertilizers made from natural gas help feed billions.
• The pesticides to control locusts and other pests.
• The number of wind turbines and solar panels as they are all made with products from fossil fuels.
World leaders are experiencing a “dangerous delusion” of a global transition to “just electricity” that eliminates the use of the fossil fuels that made society achieve so much in a few centuries.
The proverb “you can’t have your cake and eat it too” tells us that:
1. You can’t rid the world of fossil fuels, and
2. Continue to enjoy the products and fuels manufactured from fossil fuels.
National economies and nations’ militaries still run on fossil fuels. There is no substitute for fossil fuel dominance, even on a longer-term horizon. To believe and act otherwise is suicidal. It’s the real “existential threat.”
You cannot run households, businesses, hospitals, and the military on occasional electricity!
By pursuing climate-driven elimination and suppression of fossil fuels, the United States and its Western allies are heading for national security and geostrategic disasters.
Economies and militaries run on fossil fuels and, more than any other nation, America’s military would be emasculated without fossil fuels.
The climate change imperative gripping the West is self-imposed civilizational suicide.
Ronald Stein, P.E., is co-author of the Pulitzer Prize-nominated book “Clean Energy Exploitations”, policy advisor on energy literacy for The Heartland Institute and The Committee for a Constructive Tomorrow, and National TV Commentator on Energy & Infrastructure with Rick Amato.
HITLER+STALIN+CASTRO+MAO+BIDEN=TYRANNY
Biden used Politics and Junk Science just like Gore the Bore dose its all about Globalism and Global Government all control by the UN why else did the Globalists steal the election in 2020
I’m pretty sure that most of those advocating net zero don’t know, and don’t want to know, the detail contained in this article. It is much more convenient to let the media tell them what to think.
An attainable goal would be reducing the use of coal to generate electricity. But that can only happen with the deployment of nuclear plants to replace them. Anything else is wishful thinking by the ignorant. But transportation will never be replaced by electric vehicles. Nor can batteries or any other energy source besides oil can fuel our transport of goods.
What has perverted the minds of net zero following authorities and why is contrary opinion stifled?
Cannot be a simple follow the money motivation, nor the influence of scary billionaires.
Self destructive lunacy, unlike good sense out East.