Climate and energy writer Norman Rogers has published an excellent article on the American Thinker website addressing the shortcomings of coronavirus models and climate models.
Rogers points out that coronavirus models began predicting up to 2 million American deaths, only to be adjusted down to its current prediction of 60,000 deaths.
The difference between 2 million deaths and 60,000 deaths is incredibly large, yet that is how much the coronavirus models have failed.
The political Left attempts to smear anybody who questions coronavirus models as attacking scientists and attacking science.
However, scrutinizing models that are being employed as justifications to restrict Americans’ freedoms is not attacking scientists.
It is, instead, performing science. And scrutinizing a scientist’s model is not the same as attacking the scientist.
Most or all modelers are presumably creating their models in order to help policymakers make wise decisions.
But noble motives do not convey scientific infallibility, especially on topics where we are making so many speculative assumptions.
As Dr. Anthony Fauci says, “Models are only as good as the assumptions that you put into the models. And those assumptions that start off when you don’t have very much data at all or the data you have is uncertain, then you put these assumptions in and you get these wide ranges of calculations of what might happen.”
Climate models are no different than coronavirus models in that they will only be as accurate as their underlying assumptions.
As wildly off-base as the coronavirus models have been, climate models have even more uncertain underlying assumptions than the coronavirus models.
Accordingly, climate models have been – and are likely to continue being – at least as off-base as the coronavirus models have been.
Urging caution before blindly accepting poorly performing climate models is not a conspiracy theory or an attack on scientists.
True scientists, and true patriots, will always seek more information rather than less before restricting Americans’ freedoms.
You can read Norman Rogers’ full article here.
Read more at Climate Realism
On the Correct Handling of Contradictions Among the People (February 27, 1957)
We think that it is harmful to the growth of art and science if administrative measures are used to impose one particular style of art or school of thought and to ban another. Questions of right and wrong in the arts and sciences should be settled through free discussion in artistic and scientific circles and through practical work in these fields. They should not be settled in summary fashion.
Chairman Mao “Little Red Book”
The Internet is a miraculous tool, in the right hands for the right goals. Sadly, it gets abused by scammers. The AGW / eco anarchists use the Internet for their selfish power grubbing ends.
The Climate and Covid 19 models are only as good and as honest as the person who designs them and most of them are total fakes just like Global Warming/Climate Change is