A recent Monmouth University poll highlights a decline in the American public’s sense of urgency about climate change, especially among younger adults. [emphasis, links added]
While 73% still believe climate change is happening, less than half now see it as a very serious problem.
This decline is most pronounced among the younger demographic, with only 50% of 18 to 34-year-olds viewing it as a very serious issue, down from 67% in 2021.
This shift could show a growing skepticism and a reprioritization of immediate concerns such as economic pressures.
The poll also notes a decrease in support for government action on climate change, with 59% in favor of more federal intervention, a drop from past years. This waning support coincides with a diminished perception of climate change as an urgent crisis.
Given the evolution of climate science, it’s critical to distinguish between substantive metrics and those used primarily to push a narrative of impending catastrophe.
For instance, while metrics like the Earth Energy Imbalance and various climate indices are valuable for understanding changes in the climate system, they come with significant uncertainties. These uncertainties often overlap with the claimed magnitude of the changes, which could lead to overestimations of the impact.
Furthermore, the narrative that supports drastic climate action often overlooks the substantial improvements in human resilience to climate-related disasters over the past century.
Despite a significant increase in global population and industrial activity, the proportion of climate-related deaths has decreased dramatically, indicating enhanced adaptability and mitigation capabilities.
The data presented below provides a compelling backdrop to the recent Monmouth University poll findings regarding climate change urgency.
The infographic highlights that there has been no significant increase in the number of hydrological, meteorological, and climatological disasters since 2000, no substantial rise in deaths from these disasters, and no significant uptick in their economic cost as a percentage of global GDP.
This stable trend suggests that the decrease in perceived urgency and importance among the American public, especially younger adults, may be influenced by an observable lack of escalation in the direct impacts of climate change. Such data can lead to skepticism or reduced concern, aligning with the poll’s finding that fewer people now see climate change as a very serious problem. This reinforces the view that while climate change is acknowledged, the catastrophic consequences often highlighted in media and political rhetoric may not resonate with the empirical evidence observed over the past two decades.
When placed in the broader context, this polling data suggests a possible realignment of public opinion towards a more measured and data-driven approach to climate policy. It highlights the importance of focusing on direct human and economic impacts rather than abstract indices that may not reliably indicate imminent disaster.
As public sentiment shifts, it might be time to reassess how we discuss and prioritize climate change in policy debates, ensuring that actions are proportionate to the actual, measurable impacts rather than driven by alarmist narratives.
Irrational Fear is written by climatologist Dr. Matthew Wielicki and is reader-supported. If you value what you have read here, please consider subscribing and supporting the work that goes into it.
Read more at Irrational Fear
There are far more Important concerns Then a false threat of Global Warming/Climate Change like Inflation and Illegal Immagration