• Privacy Policy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
Climate Change Dispatch
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
Climate Change Dispatch
No Result
View All Result

Confessions Of A Global Warming Day Trader

by Alan Stewart, guest post
June 20, 2018, 8:38 AM
in News and Opinion
Reading Time: 4 mins read
A A
2

‘Ladies and gentlemen the story you are about to read is true. Only the names have been changed to protect the innocent.’ The Hollywood series ‘Dragnet’ started in the early 1950s and was seminal as it parted from ‘police glitz’ productions of the day (and subsequent offerings) and portrayed the reality of police work.

Anthropogenic global warming, aka man-made climate change, is to be understood as science seized and turned into ‘scientific glitz.’ An Inconvenient Truth is prima facie evidence of that. Science warped into a message of fear.

Climate change, in reality, has never been about climate science. It has always been about one of the seven deadly sins: Lust. It was and still is the lust for power and money.

In the late 1980s, the corruptocrat Maurice Strong and the scientist James Hansen allied with many others and understood how they could use environmentalism to manipulate the masses and feed both their egos and bank accounts.

The money managers of vast wealth, with sensitive noses to the winds of change, saw an opportunity. Investment dollars are derived from the ‘grunts’ on the trading floors selling the ‘investment opportunity du jour.’ By chance, I contacted one of those day traders and his story is true and I’ll just call him JC.

Part 1

I am not a scientist. I have Masters degrees in public administration, business administration, and a partially completed a masters in microbiology (never wrote the thesis).

As predominantly a finance guy, I worked at a large hedge fund for a number of years and at the fund where I worked, we took a bit of a Gretzky-like perspective on investing.

I set out for over 2+ years dedicating a material portion of every week studying AGW, trying to skate to where the puck is going to be.

I had virtually unlimited resources to hire experts and scientists to talk to me about anything climate. In effect, they were my scientific staff.

Emphasis…I was looking for ways to place trades that would capture value from the schemes and trends in place as a result of AGW.

But after almost three years of hard work, chasing down rat hole after rat hole, I had to report to my boss that as promising as the possibility appeared when I set out to develop tradable ideas, the entire theory of trading AGW trends was thrown into question. Not because the science was too complicated, but because the science was bullshit.

With my report my boss said in response, “John, I was watching NPR the other day (major red flag!) and they had a NASA guy saying that it is certain that unless we curb and eventually end our use of fossil fuels, we will enter an un-excitable feedback loop where the earth will warm to the point that it is uninhabitable. JC, this WAS A NASA SCIENTIST!”

I said, “David, it’s all a bullshit scheme to capture and redistribute wealth to consolidate global power and convert the capitalist system into socialism and communism. The origins of the “movement” are Stasi.”

David was less interested in the political aspects of what I told (and showed) him. We managed $1Bn in energy assets; largely oil and natural gas both up- and downstream. When he eventually came to understand the politics of it, he definitely understood the economic ramifications on the energy space.

I’ll give you one-decade-later data point in support of my discussion with David. The Norwegian Sovereign Wealth Fund is the largest SWF in the world with over $1.2Tn in assets. Six percent of their assets are in oil & gas ($60Bn).

They have agreed to divest all direct investment in energy-producing publicly traded companies. The irony, of course, is that the origin of the fund was derived entirely from North Sea crude.

Part 2

The fund did not invest in renewables but would have had we thought them a strong business with non-subsidized underlying fundamentals. Solar, of course, is a J-O-K-E.

When China ceased supplying support to its solar industry 3-4 months ago, the industry collapsed. Same in Germany. Same with UK wind.

Same would be true with US ethanol. This would make a great Peter Schweizerische documentary. The entire renewable complex in the US is corrupt. Joe Biden’s kids would merit an entire chapter. And Key Reid (Sen. Harry Reid’s brat) the same.

If the world took the trillions of dollars it flushed down the renewables’ toilet and directed the same resources to develop infrastructure in third-world nations, we would make a serious dent in the fight to improve/elevate the human condition. It’s tragic.

Much as Rachel Carson’s effort resulted in the death of 40 million impoverished children, the “Green” (RED) movement has ill-affected hundreds of millions of people in Asia, C&S. America and Africa. Sad really and I wish it would stop.

It’s why I lean strongly Libertarian. While I am not a card-carrying member of that group, I believe that when governments get involved in a big way in anything, gross distortions take place.

War, housing, healthcare, environment, science, to name a few. It all gets effed up when the government decides it is going to do “Good.”

So global warming…I studied it in an effort to make a profit from what I believed would be a government-driven wave. And in so studying, I realized that the underlying AGW “problem” was a complete fiction.

Note:

This is the ‘Information Age’ and as someone quoted years ago; ‘It lends credibility to uninformed opinion. The crux of this article is that JC did his homework, he acted and did not react. I suppose the best way to end this tale is as such.

When one of the rabid alarmists confronts you quietly reply; ‘I would love to listen to your argument. Please supply me with the facts ma’am, just the facts.’ Thank you, Sergeant Joe Friday.

—ALS al*******@*****ne.com

  • Truth
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Gettr
  • Threads
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Mastodon
  • Buffer
  • Telegram
  • Email
  • Copy Link
  • Share Using More Networks…

Popular Posts

Electric Vehicles (EVs)

The ‘Green’ Scam Of The Century: How ‘Renewables’ Increase Fossil Fuel Demands

Oct 23, 2024
News and Opinion

Antarctica Is Colder, Icier Today Than At Any Time In 5,000 Years

Apr 15, 2024
Energy

30-Plus Signs That The Climate Scam Is Collapsing

Apr 09, 2025

Comments 2

  1. Nick Shroeder, BSME, says:
    8 years ago

    Here are the faux facts beneath it all.

    Three decades of rancorous handwavium debate over evidence for and the physics behind the Radiative Greenhouse House Effect and man-caused climate change, aka CAGW.
    What a waste since none of it is real.
    The earth being 33 C warmer with an atmosphere is based on the difference between two completely unrelated made up numbers: 288 K, a wild ass guess pulled straight out of WMO’s butt and 255 K, a theoretical S-B BB ideal calculation for the 240 W/m^2 Long Wave Infrared Radiation leaving the top of the atmosphere.
    Furthermore, the lunar studies by Volokin/Nikolov and Kramm clearly conclude that without an atmosphere the earth would be much like the moon, a barren rock with the lit/hot side maybe 390 K, the dark/cold side maybe 190 K and not even colder by 33 C.
    The LWIR up/down/”back” GHG energy warming loop is a theoretical S-B BB ideal baseline calculation for any surface at 288 K and likewise not real. Contiguous participating media, i.e. atmospheric molecules, render impossible any BB emission from the surface.
    No 33 C warmer + No GHG energy loop = No RGHE & No CAGW.
    Am I wrong?
    Always possible – for all of us.
    ’cause if I’m not wrong decades of research, “evidence,” publications and billions of dollars goes straight in the dumper and the entire trillion dollar global climate change industry is suddenly unemployed.

  2. Spurwing Plover says:
    8 years ago

    Maurice Strong James Hansen,Al Bore and Leonardo DiCaprio marooned together on a island somewhere and lets add Robert Kennedy Jr and David Suzuki and without the Paparazi

Stay Connected On Social Media

gab-logo

Donate Today

Beating back the alarmist narrative takes time and money. Please donate today to help!

Recent Posts

  • holiday cocoaData Doesn’t Support Claims That Climate Change Is Ending Holiday Foods
    Dec 19, 2025
    Media claims that holiday foods are vanishing don’t match long-term production trends for cocoa, coffee, vanilla, and cinnamon. […]
  • uk solar farm milibandEd ‘Net Zero’ Miliband Set To Miss Clean Energy Target By Three Years
    Dec 19, 2025
    Ed Miliband is on track to miss the UK’s 2030 clean energy target due to anemic wind farm growth, higher electricity bills, and rising power demand. […]
  • antarctic penguinsSea Levels Were 30 Meters Higher In East Antarctica 8,000 Years Ago, Study Finds
    Dec 19, 2025
    New research finds sea levels in East Antarctica were 30 meters higher 8,000 years ago—with today’s levels at the their lowest in millennia. […]
  • protest rising seas‘Never Mind:’ The High-Profile Retreat From Overblown Climate Claims
    Dec 19, 2025
    Prominent figures are stepping back from extreme climate predictions, signaling a shift away from alarmist rhetoric. […]
  • California Forces Ratepayers To Keep Funding Failed Ivanpah Solar Project
    Dec 19, 2025
    Despite high costs and poor performance, California regulators want ratepayers to keep funding the money-losing Ivanpah solar plant. […]
  • hochul climate allianceHochul Delays Climate Targets As New Yorkers Fume Over Energy Costs
    Dec 18, 2025
    Hochul claims a climate pause, but New Yorkers face soaring energy costs while her green agenda and election politics collide. […]
  • dartboard missed targetClimate Policy Keeps Failing—So They Quietly Move the Goalposts
    Dec 18, 2025
    Climate policy keeps missing its targets—so the goalposts keep changing instead of the results. […]
  • cameron interview‘Avatar’ Director James Cameron Slams Trump For Rejecting Climate Panic
    Dec 18, 2025
    In a new interview, James Cameron slams Trump for rejecting climate panic, accusing him of sending humanity “backwards.” […]
  • protest climate action nowTrump Admin Moves To Dismantle NCAR, Major Source Of Climate Alarmism
    Dec 18, 2025
    Trump shuts down NCAR, cutting a key hub of federally funded climate propaganda and ending years of left-wing alarmism. […]
  • arctic walrus ice2025 Arctic Report Card: Summer Sea Ice Conditions Boosting Polar Marine Life
    Dec 18, 2025
    NOAA’s 2025 Arctic Report Card showed rising ocean productivity as summer sea ice levels stalled rather than collapsed. […]

Get Instant Email Notifications

Subscribe to receive a digest of daily stories, or get emailed once they're published. Check your Junk/Spam folder for a verification email.

Submit a tip

Please enter your email, so we know you're human.

Books You May Like

exposing great lie

Have a suggestion? Let us know! We swap out books based on your input. We participate in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. See here.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us

© Portions copyright Climate Change Dispatch

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us

© 2025 Climate Change Dispatch

 
Share via
  • Facebook
  • Like
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Digg
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky
Share via
  • Digg
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky