• Privacy Policy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
Climate Change Dispatch
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
Climate Change Dispatch
No Result
View All Result

Colorado State Team Predicts Very Mild Hurricane Season

by Rick Mellerup, Sandpaper
May 06, 2015, 12:43 PM
in News and Opinion
Reading Time: 4 mins read
A A
0

HurricaneTalk about going out not with a bang but a whimper!

William M. Gray of the Colorado State University Tropical Meteorology Project, the dean of long-range hurricane forecasts, is retiring from that field to concentrate on the issues of climate change and global warming.

His timing may be perfect. Gray made his first seasonal forecast in 1984. Five of the 10 busiest years ‚Äì in number of hurricanes since records began in 1851 ‚Äì took place while Gray was on watch, including the record-busting 2005 season that featured 15 hurricanes and the infamous Katrina. No less than 11 of the 15 busiest seasons in terms of named storms took place during Gray’s tenure, led once again by 2005 with an incredible 28. (The runner up, 1933, had 20.) No wonder the press and the public eagerly awaited Gray’s annual forecasts.

But tropical activity in the Atlantic Basin seems to be in a slow cycle. Only two hurricanes developed during the 2013 season and for the first time since 1994, there were no major (Category 3 or above) blows. Then in 2014, there were six hurricanes, including two that breached the major threshold, but only eight named storms, the fewest since 1997. Gray expects more of the same this year:

“We anticipate that the 2015 Atlantic Basin hurricane season will be one of the least active seasons since the middle of the 20th century,” read the introduction of this year’s CSU preseason forecast, the last that will bear Gray’s name. “It appears quite likely that an El Ni√±o (atmospheric wind current) of at least moderate strength will develop this summer and fall. The tropical and subtropical Atlantic is also quite cool at present. We anticipate a below-average probability for major hurricanes making landfall along the United States coastline and in the Caribbean.”

Indeed, his team’s forecast is calling for nothing short of a stunningly mild hurricane season. Gray and Co. expect just seven named storms to develop in the Atlantic this season, which runs from June 1 through Nov. 30. The average between 1981 and 2010 was a dozen. The scientists predict only three hurricanes, as compared to a 1981-2010 average of 6¬Ω per year. One of those hurricanes, said the Colorado State meteorologists, will be a major one, Category 3 or higher. Two such monster storms typically formed each year between 1981 and 2010.

The CSU’s prediction for a major hurricane landfall in the U.S. is also on the decidedly low side. The scientists said there is a 28 percent possibility of a Category 3 or above hurricane hitting this country’s coastline. The average for the last century was 52 percent.

Gray, the octogenarian pioneer of long-range hurricane forecasts, has been weaning himself from the predictions for a decade, giving more responsibility to his prot√©g√©, Philip J. Klotzbach. Now Gray is saying, in a self-deprecating way, that he’s bowing out of the hurricane prediction biz altogether.

“Klotzbach became lead author of the CSU forecasts in 2006,” Gray wrote, “and in recent years has expended most of his efforts in researching and writing up these forecasts and their post-season evaluation. We still talk nearly every day on climate-hurricane matters, and no forecast has been released without my detailed comments. Phil has been making all the final forecast decisions in recent years. He has, nevertheless, appointed me to serve in the important role of taking the blame for any and all forecast busts, with all credit for successful forecasts going to him. I have fully embraced this special arrangement.

“Although I still come to my office every working day and remain quite active, I am now devoting more of my research efforts to the climate change and global warming issue. For this reason I will be discontinuing my formal association with these seasonal hurricane forecasts at the end of this year. But I will remain as a special personal advisor to Phil in all of his future CSU hurricane forecasts as long as I am able.”

Gray was controversial when he started making his long-range forecasts. The meteorologists of the time feared gazing into a figurative crystal ball months ahead of time. Gray, however, developed a system of hurricane prediction called “hindcasting.” Gray looked at the atmospheric-oceanic conditions during the winter and spring of prior years since 1950 and recorded the number of storms and hurricanes that ended up developing. He then looked at the current year’s conditions and, after finding similar patterns in the past, predicted a comparable season.

This winter, for example, the CSU team looked for years that were generally characterized by at least moderate El Niño conditions and cool temperature in the tropical Atlantic. Five stood out: 1957, 1987, 1991, 1993 and 2014. They averaged 7.8 named storms and 4 hurricanes, including 1.6 of the major variety. Thus the prediction for a mild hurricane season for 2015.

Since Gray’s groundbreaking efforts, other meteorologists and climatologists have started making their own long-range hurricane forecasts, even the conservative folks at the National Weather Service Climate Prediction Center who release theirs in late May. A public consortium named Tropical Storm Risk, based at University College London, released a report on April 9 ‚Äì the same day as CSU ‚Äì which called for 11 named storms and five hurricanes, including two majors. On April 13 North Carolina State University chipped in, predicting four to six named storms and just one to three hurricanes, including one major. The Weather Channel, on April 22, called for nine storms and five hurricanes, including one Category 3 or above.

So there will be plenty of people, including Klotzbach, making long-range hurricane forecasts in the future. But with Gray’s announced retirement, an era has definitely ended.

Source

  • Truth
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Gettr
  • Threads
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Mastodon
  • Buffer
  • Telegram
  • Email
  • Copy Link
  • Share Using More Networks…

Popular Posts

Electric Vehicles (EVs)

The ‘Green’ Scam Of The Century: How ‘Renewables’ Increase Fossil Fuel Demands

Oct 23, 2024
News and Opinion

Antarctica Is Colder, Icier Today Than At Any Time In 5,000 Years

Apr 15, 2024
Energy

30-Plus Signs That The Climate Scam Is Collapsing

Apr 09, 2025

Stay Connected On Social Media

gab-logo

Donate Today

Beating back the alarmist narrative takes time and money. Please donate today to help!

Recent Posts

  • solar electric billVirginia Has No Climate Crisis—So Why Revive A Carbon Tax?
    Feb 6, 2026
    RGGI failed to deliver climate benefits while raising the state's electricity costs. Virginia Democrats now want the tax reinstated. […]
  • desert pump jackCalifornia Law Leaves Mineral Rights Owners With Worthless Properties
    Feb 6, 2026
    A California law banning new oil drilling near homes has left many oil-and-gas mineral rights owners unable to use or profit from their property. […]
  • Biden pimping solarThis Republican Wants To Resurrect Biden-Era Green Energy Handouts
    Feb 6, 2026
    A GOP lawmaker is pushing to revive Biden-era green energy subsidies, reopening the debate over using taxpayer dollars to support renewables. […]
  • farm tractor wheat harvestThe Climate Scaremongers: World Cereal Production Breaks More Records
    Feb 6, 2026
    UN data show world cereal production keeps climbing, despite years of dire claims driven by ‘climate’ models. […]
  • mayor newsomWATCH: ‘The Daily Show’ Mocks Newsom’s Record On Homelessness, High-Speed Rail
    Feb 6, 2026
    The Daily Show rolls out a fake movie trailer mocking Gov. Gavin Newsom’s record on homelessness and California’s beleaguered high-speed rail. […]
  • gas supply tankGerman Gas Crisis Wasn’t Caused By A Cold Winter—It Was Bad Policy
    Feb 6, 2026
    Germany’s gas storage has fallen to just 28%, exposing policy failures—not winter weather—as the real cause of the country’s energy crisis. […]
  • thune presserGOP Allowed Groundwork For Carbon Tax To Slip Into Funding Bill, Opponents Warn
    Feb 5, 2026
    Opponents warn language in a new funding bill could lay groundwork for future carbon taxes by directing an Energy Department emissions review. […]
  • va capitol cash grabBipartisan Lawmakers Kill Climate Superfund Bill In Virginia
    Feb 5, 2026
    Bipartisan Virginia lawmakers blocked a climate superfund bill, citing retroactive liability and due-process concerns. […]
  • chris wrightIf Your Power Bill Is Sky-High, Thank Your State Leaders
    Feb 5, 2026
    High power bills aren’t bad luck or market forces — they’re the result of political decisions made by clueless blue state leaders. […]
  • bullet train coming soonCalifornia Dems To Hide High-Speed Rail Records As Costs And Delays Mount
    Feb 5, 2026
    California’s bullet train moves to track-laying—years late, billions over budget, and on a fraction of the promised route, as transparency questions grow. […]

Get Instant Email Notifications

Subscribe to receive a digest of daily stories, or get emailed once they're published. Check your Junk/Spam folder for a verification email.

Submit a tip

Please enter your email, so we know you're human.

Books You May Like

exposing great lie

Have a suggestion? Let us know! We swap out books based on your input. We participate in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. See here.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us

© Portions copyright Climate Change Dispatch

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Climate Change Dispatch

 
Share via
  • Facebook
  • Like
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Digg
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky
Share via
  • Digg
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky