Global carbon dioxide emissions will likely hit record highs this year, according to a new report released Wednesday as United Nations diplomats meet in Poland to hash out details of the Paris climate accord.
Global emissions will rise roughly 3 percent to 37.1 gigatons in 2018, according to the Global Carbon Project (GCP).
The rise in emissions was largely fueled by an uptick in coal-fired power generation in China and India.
“Emissions in China, India, and the US are expected to increase in 2018, while emissions in the [European Union] are expected to decline, and all other countries combined will most likely increase,” reads the report by GCP, which tracks emissions.
“The peak in global emissions is not yet in sight,” reads GCP’s report.
Record-setting came despite the Paris climate accord being in force for two years and an estimated $2 billion worth of U.N. climate summits since 1995.
U.N. climate summits are meant to bring world leaders together to tackle global warming.
But that clearly hasn’t happened, leading some experts to question the usefulness of lavish annual U.N. climate conferences — the current summit in Katowice, Poland, likely costs more than $130 million.
“$2 billion was spent on these meetings, and for what?” environmental economist Richard Tol tweeted Wednesday.
Tol has tracked the cost of U.N. climate summits since 1995 when the first Conference of the Parties, or COP, was held in Berlin, Germany. Ever since then, the costs of U.N. climate summits have skyrocketed along with global emissions.
The costs of UNFCCC meetings and global CO2 emissions pic.twitter.com/6i5idrnFsZ
— Prof Dr Richard S.J. Tol MAE (@RichardTol) December 5, 2018
In that time, the U.N. has convinced most countries to sign onto two global climate agreements — the Kyoto Protocol and the Paris accord. The latter replaced the Kyoto Protocol and went into effect in 2016.
U.S. President Donald Trump pledged to withdraw the U.S. from the Paris accord in 2020, undoing a major part of former U.S. President Barack Obama’s legacy on environmental issues.
The nearly 200 countries that signed onto the Paris accord, including China and the U.S., agreed to cut carbon dioxide emissions enough to keep future global warming under 2 degrees Celsius by 2100.
There was much fanfare around the Paris accord, which countries initially signed onto at the U.N.’s 2015 summit in Paris.
In particular, the Obama administration and environmentalists touted China’s acceptance of the Paris accord and pledge to “peak” emissions in 2030.
However, coal still makes up the bulk of China’s electric sector and will continue to do so for some time, according to experts.
“There was hope that China was rapidly moving away from coal power generation, but the last two years has shown it will not be so easy for China to say farewell to coal quickly,” Jan Ivar Korsbakken, a senior researcher at the Center for International Climate Research, told Axios.
“Coal is likely to dominate the Chinese energy system in the next decade, even if the skyrocketing growth seen in the mid-2000s is unlikely to return,” Korsbakken said.
The U.N.’s latest “emissions gap” report found “the G20 countries are collectively not on track to meet their unconditional [nationally determined contributions] for 2030,” meaning the world’s largest economies aren’t cutting emissions fast enough to meet their Paris accord pledges.
“If the emissions gap is not closed by 2030, it is very plausible that the goal of a well-below 2°C temperature increase is also out of reach,” the U.N. reported in November. “Coal is likely to dominate the Chinese energy system in the next decade, even if the skyrocketing growth seen in the mid-2000s is unlikely to return.”
Read more at Daily Caller
The Greens focus most of their efforts on Uncle Sam, but China is immune? Xi would tell Google to censor them. If they protested, he’d squash them with tanks.
“The rise in emissions was largely fueled by an uptick in coal-fired power generation in China and India.” REALLY???
“Scientists are starting to get a handle on how big geologic events influence each other, stitching together measurements of how an eruption in one part of the world can lead to tremors in another. ” BUT… less than 10% of all KNOWN ACTIVE VOLCANOES have ever been tested for CO2 emissions AND a far smaller number are actually being monitored.
Volcanic and seismic activity in the Pacific Rim has been increasing and so far 2018 has been quite active.
https://www.vox.com/science-and-health/2018/1/24/16924312/earthquake-volcano-mayon-philippines-japan
Mayon volcano eruption Jan 2018
Mt Sinabung volcano eruption Feb 2018
Kilauea Eruption may 2018
Volcán de Fuego eruption Jun2018
Katla (volcano) in Iceland is about to blow or it isn’t. but it is “giving off five to ten times more CO2 than vulcanologists expected.” Sep 2018
And there are more… lots more and 2018 ain’t over yet.
You can look up monthly or even daily activity here…
https://www.volcanodiscovery.com/fileadmin/maps/active-volcano-map.jpg
And here an IMPRESSIVE list of currently known ACTIVE volcanoes… wonder how many are “giving off five to ten times more CO2 than vulcanologists expected.”????
https://www.volcanodiscovery.com/volcanoes/alphabetical-list/a-z.html
Volcanoes located under water are also known as submarine volcanoes. There are at least 1,500 active volcanoes on the surface of the earth, but it is estimated that there may be more than 10,000 volcanoes in the Pacific Ocean alone. No one knows for sure.
Human caused CO2, through breathing, defecation and fossil fuel burning is trivial compared to earths own natural CO2 emissions. Would a warming Earth, devoid of humans, overrun with 700 billion Wildebeest find them guilty of Bovine caused global climate change? No. Not really. But Global carbon dioxide emissions will likely hit record highs this year, according to ANOTHER new report released Wednesday by climate change scientists to coincide with the United Nations Paris climate SCAM meeting in Poland.
We are being fed BS. Not science.
Gerry, how can they tax volcanoes?
It is estimated by geophysicists that only three volcanic eruptions, Indonesia (1883), Alaska (1912) and Iceland (1947), spewed more carbon dioxide into the atmosphere than all of human activities in our entire history.
This article needs clarification. It is true that the most nations are not on track to meet their unconditional nationally determined contributions for 2030 under the Paris Treaty. However, the alarmists all agree that these goals are inadequate and much deeper cuts are required. As most commonly used the emissions gap usually refers to the actual cuts being made and the deeper cuts that are said to be necessary.
Clarification…. it is a lie. How does one clear up confusion and make it more understandable when the entire “climate change” conversation lacks accuracy?
Assigning an “outcome” to a lie is irrational…. and would be just another lie.
Just a coincidence that “alarmists” comprise only .04% of Western civilization. They get 40% of the headlines.
(I made this up, but lying is so facile these days, I decided to join them)