• Privacy Policy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
Climate Change Dispatch
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
Climate Change Dispatch
No Result
View All Result

CO2 Emissions Hit Record Highs In 2018, Despite Billions Spent On UN Climate Summits

by Michael Bastasch
December 06, 2018, 4:33 PM
in News and Opinion
Reading Time: 3 mins read
A A
7

cop24 make it happen nowGlobal carbon dioxide emissions will likely hit record highs this year, according to a new report released Wednesday as United Nations diplomats meet in Poland to hash out details of the Paris climate accord.

Global emissions will rise roughly 3 percent to 37.1 gigatons in 2018, according to the Global Carbon Project (GCP).

The rise in emissions was largely fueled by an uptick in coal-fired power generation in China and India.

“Emissions in China, India, and the US are expected to increase in 2018, while emissions in the [European Union] are expected to decline, and all other countries combined will most likely increase,” reads the report by GCP, which tracks emissions.

“The peak in global emissions is not yet in sight,” reads GCP’s report.

Record-setting came despite the Paris climate accord being in force for two years and an estimated $2 billion worth of U.N. climate summits since 1995.

U.N. climate summits are meant to bring world leaders together to tackle global warming.

But that clearly hasn’t happened, leading some experts to question the usefulness of lavish annual U.N. climate conferences — the current summit in Katowice, Poland, likely costs more than $130 million.

“$2 billion was spent on these meetings, and for what?” environmental economist Richard Tol tweeted Wednesday.

Tol has tracked the cost of U.N. climate summits since 1995 when the first Conference of the Parties, or COP, was held in Berlin, Germany. Ever since then, the costs of U.N. climate summits have skyrocketed along with global emissions.

The costs of UNFCCC meetings and global CO2 emissions pic.twitter.com/6i5idrnFsZ

— Prof Dr Richard S.J. Tol MAE (@RichardTol) December 5, 2018

In that time, the U.N. has convinced most countries to sign onto two global climate agreements — the Kyoto Protocol and the Paris accord. The latter replaced the Kyoto Protocol and went into effect in 2016.

U.S. President Donald Trump pledged to withdraw the U.S. from the Paris accord in 2020, undoing a major part of former U.S. President Barack Obama’s legacy on environmental issues.

The nearly 200 countries that signed onto the Paris accord, including China and the U.S., agreed to cut carbon dioxide emissions enough to keep future global warming under 2 degrees Celsius by 2100.

There was much fanfare around the Paris accord, which countries initially signed onto at the U.N.’s 2015 summit in Paris.

In particular, the Obama administration and environmentalists touted China’s acceptance of the Paris accord and pledge to “peak” emissions in 2030.

However, coal still makes up the bulk of China’s electric sector and will continue to do so for some time, according to experts.

“There was hope that China was rapidly moving away from coal power generation, but the last two years has shown it will not be so easy for China to say farewell to coal quickly,” Jan Ivar Korsbakken, a senior researcher at the Center for International Climate Research, told Axios.

“Coal is likely to dominate the Chinese energy system in the next decade, even if the skyrocketing growth seen in the mid-2000s is unlikely to return,” Korsbakken said.

The U.N.’s latest “emissions gap” report found “the G20 countries are collectively not on track to meet their unconditional [nationally determined contributions] for 2030,” meaning the world’s largest economies aren’t cutting emissions fast enough to meet their Paris accord pledges.

“If the emissions gap is not closed by 2030, it is very plausible that the goal of a well-below 2°C temperature increase is also out of reach,” the U.N. reported in November. “Coal is likely to dominate the Chinese energy system in the next decade, even if the skyrocketing growth seen in the mid-2000s is unlikely to return.”

Read more at Daily Caller

  • Truth
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Gettr
  • Threads
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Mastodon
  • Buffer
  • Telegram
  • Email
  • Copy Link
  • Share Using More Networks…

Popular Posts

Electric Vehicles (EVs)

The ‘Green’ Scam Of The Century: How ‘Renewables’ Increase Fossil Fuel Demands

Oct 23, 2024
News and Opinion

Antarctica Is Colder, Icier Today Than At Any Time In 5,000 Years

Apr 15, 2024
Energy

30-Plus Signs That The Climate Scam Is Collapsing

Apr 09, 2025

Comments 7

  1. Sonnyhill says:
    7 years ago

    The Greens focus most of their efforts on Uncle Sam, but China is immune? Xi would tell Google to censor them. If they protested, he’d squash them with tanks.

  2. Gerry says:
    7 years ago

    “The rise in emissions was largely fueled by an uptick in coal-fired power generation in China and India.” REALLY???

    “Scientists are starting to get a handle on how big geologic events influence each other, stitching together measurements of how an eruption in one part of the world can lead to tremors in another. ” BUT… less than 10% of all KNOWN ACTIVE VOLCANOES have ever been tested for CO2 emissions AND a far smaller number are actually being monitored.

    Volcanic and seismic activity in the Pacific Rim has been increasing and so far 2018 has been quite active.

    https://www.vox.com/science-and-health/2018/1/24/16924312/earthquake-volcano-mayon-philippines-japan

    Mayon volcano eruption Jan 2018

    Mt Sinabung volcano eruption Feb 2018

    Kilauea Eruption may 2018

    Volcán de Fuego eruption Jun2018

    Katla (volcano) in Iceland is about to blow or it isn’t. but it is “giving off five to ten times more CO2 than vulcanologists expected.” Sep 2018

    And there are more… lots more and 2018 ain’t over yet.

    You can look up monthly or even daily activity here…

    https://www.volcanodiscovery.com/fileadmin/maps/active-volcano-map.jpg

    And here an IMPRESSIVE list of currently known ACTIVE volcanoes… wonder how many are “giving off five to ten times more CO2 than vulcanologists expected.”????

    https://www.volcanodiscovery.com/volcanoes/alphabetical-list/a-z.html

    Volcanoes located under water are also known as submarine volcanoes. There are at least 1,500 active volcanoes on the surface of the earth, but it is estimated that there may be more than 10,000 volcanoes in the Pacific Ocean alone. No one knows for sure.

    Human caused CO2, through breathing, defecation and fossil fuel burning is trivial compared to earths own natural CO2 emissions. Would a warming Earth, devoid of humans, overrun with 700 billion Wildebeest find them guilty of Bovine caused global climate change? No. Not really. But Global carbon dioxide emissions will likely hit record highs this year, according to ANOTHER new report released Wednesday by climate change scientists to coincide with the United Nations Paris climate SCAM meeting in Poland.

    We are being fed BS. Not science.

    • Sonnyhill says:
      7 years ago

      Gerry, how can they tax volcanoes?

    • David Lewis says:
      7 years ago

      It is estimated by geophysicists that only three volcanic eruptions, Indonesia (1883), Alaska (1912) and Iceland (1947), spewed more carbon dioxide into the atmosphere than all of human activities in our entire history.

  3. David Lewis says:
    7 years ago

    This article needs clarification. It is true that the most nations are not on track to meet their unconditional nationally determined contributions for 2030 under the Paris Treaty. However, the alarmists all agree that these goals are inadequate and much deeper cuts are required. As most commonly used the emissions gap usually refers to the actual cuts being made and the deeper cuts that are said to be necessary.

    • Gerry says:
      7 years ago

      Clarification…. it is a lie. How does one clear up confusion and make it more understandable when the entire “climate change” conversation lacks accuracy?

      Assigning an “outcome” to a lie is irrational…. and would be just another lie.

    • Sonnyhill says:
      7 years ago

      Just a coincidence that “alarmists” comprise only .04% of Western civilization. They get 40% of the headlines.
      (I made this up, but lying is so facile these days, I decided to join them)

Stay Connected On Social Media

gab-logo

Donate Today

Beating back the alarmist narrative takes time and money. Please donate today to help!

Recent Posts

  • green energy infrastructureWhen Real-World Data Contradicts The CO2–Temperature Climate Narrative
    Feb 12, 2026
    Real-world data and standard statistical tests challenge the assumed causal link between CO2 levels and rising global temperatures. […]
  • money pile‘The Week’ Claims Climate Change Cut U.S. Wages, Real Data Says Otherwise
    Feb 12, 2026
    Official wage data show U.S. paychecks rising during recent mild warming, contradicting claims that climate change has cut incomes. […]
  • newsomSupreme Court Deals Crushing Blow To California’s EV Mandate
    Feb 11, 2026
    Supreme Court ruling opens the door to legal challenges against California’s 2035 electric vehicle mandate. […]
  • EPA headquartersRepealing The Endangerment Finding Shows CO2 Was Never An ‘Existential Threat’
    Feb 11, 2026
    Repealing the EPA’s endangerment finding weakens the case for more climate spending and exposes the shaky foundation behind carbon regulation. […]
  • clouds sun hotHow A Scientific Myth Undergirds The Greenhouse Gas Theory
    Feb 11, 2026
    A closer look at the 19th-century experiment behind modern greenhouse theory—and why its findings don’t hold up today. […]
  • lee zeldin capitalEPA Rescinding The Endangerment Finding Hinges On Repealing Supreme Court Precedent
    Feb 11, 2026
    EPA’s repeal of the endangerment finding may fail in court unless the Supreme Court overturns Massachusetts v. EPA. […]
  • model v actual worldWhy Climate Science Is Not Settled
    Feb 10, 2026
    Climate models, extreme weather claims, and CO2 assumptions don’t hold up when tested against real-world data. […]
  • endangerment finding shredderHow The EPA’s Endangerment Finding Was Pre-Cooked
    Feb 10, 2026
    How a already decided EPA ruling became the legal backbone of U.S. climate policy—and why its scientific foundation is now coming apart. […]
  • bald eagles nestObama-Funded Wind Turbine Kills Bald Eagle In Minnesota, Faces Federal Penalty
    Feb 10, 2026
    Federal officials say a University of Minnesota wind turbine killed a bald eagle, triggering penalties under federal wildlife law. […]
  • winter cityscapeNYT Admits Observable Data Undercuts Claims Of Worsening Arctic Cold Blasts
    Feb 10, 2026
    NYT acknowledges observable data show Arctic cold blasts are becoming less extreme, despite claims tying them to polar vortex disruption. […]

Get Instant Email Notifications

Subscribe to receive a digest of daily stories, or get emailed once they're published. Check your Junk/Spam folder for a verification email.

Submit a tip

Please enter your email, so we know you're human.

Books You May Like

exposing great lie

Have a suggestion? Let us know! We swap out books based on your input. We participate in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. See here.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us

© Portions copyright Climate Change Dispatch

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Climate Change Dispatch

 
Share via
  • Facebook
  • Like
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Digg
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky
Share via
  • Digg
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky