We have mentioned countless times on this blog that the warming oceans are evidence that CO2 is not the cause of global warming. To understand the climate, you must first understand the oceans.
The oceans control the global climate. As the oceans warm, they warm and alter the humidity of the atmosphere above them.
The problem is, as we have pointed out countless times, CO2’s only defined mechanism by which to affect climate change is through the thermalization of LWIR between 13 and 18µ.
LWIR between 13 and 18µ doesn’t penetrate or warm the oceans. Visible radiation, mainly from the high energy blue end of the spectrum does. CO2 is transparent to incoming visible radiation.
The energy stored in the atmosphere and land is insignificant when compared to the oceans. The oceans contain 2,000x the energy of the atmosphere, so small changes to the oceans can mean big changes in the atmospheric temperature.
The oceans also produce vast amounts of CO2 (20 x the amount man produces), and the most abundant and potent greenhouse gas, water vapor.
The warming oceans are evidence that CO2 ISN’T the cause of the recent warming. Oceans are warmed by more incoming radiation reaching them, and that is in fact what has been happening (Click Here).
It is extremely easy to explain the recent warming due to natural causes, explanation that is backed by the evidence, not just uneducated highly biased and conflicted opinions.
How does “InsideClimate News” report on the issue of the warming oceans? They claim that the warming oceans are the greatest evidence of fossil fuels caused global warming.
The Most Powerful Evidence Climate Scientists Have of Global Warming.
The oceans hold the story of a planet warming as fossil fuels are burned.
Clearly, they don’t understand the physics supporting the warming of the oceans and GHG effect, but, let’s have a look at how “InsideClimate News” defends such ignorance.
They claim to have all the proof in four charts.
Here is what scientists have discovered, in four charts.
Chart #1:
No one argues that the oceans are warming, they are. Warming oceans aren’t evidenced that CO2 is causing the warming. As stated above, LWIR between 13 and 18µ doesn’t penetrate or warm the oceans.
“InsideClimate News” offers no explanation as to how CO2 and LWIR between 13 and 18µ could possibly warm the oceans.
As mentioned above, post-1992, cleaner air has resulted in more visible radiation warming of the oceans, not CO2. Funny how “InsideClimate News” forgot to mention that.
Chart #2:
This graphic validates the incoming visible radiation warms the oceans theory. CO2 is transparent to incoming warming visible radiation.
While it is correct that Greenhouse gases do absorb much of the outgoing radiation, CO2 is insignificant in the lower atmosphere.
The first CO2 signature is identified at an altitude of about 3 km when H2O starts to precipitate out of the atmosphere.
MODTRAN demonstrates that CO2 has zero impact on the energy budget in the lower atmosphere as long as H2O is present.
The following MODTRAN reports show that doubling CO2 from 400 ppm to 800 ppm results in zero change to the 407.572 W/M^2 of outgoing radiation in the lower atmosphere.
A zero change. Funny how “InsideClimate News” forgot to mention that.
Who do you trust more? A computer program or “InsideClimate News.”
Chart #3:
Okay, I got it, the oceans are warming…but what does that have to do with CO2? The Oceans naturally go through cycles like El Niño and La Niña, but those aren’t caused by CO2.
There was a strong El Niño, and ocean temperatures are rapidly returning to normal. CO2 has nothing to do with the ocean cycles.
“InsideClimate News” conveniently chose the time period leading up to the El Niño, and forgot to mention what happened after.
Funny how “InsideClimate News” forgot to mention that. (H/T Real Science)
Satellite data also shows atmospheric temperatures tightly tied to ocean cycles. Note how fast temperatures are falling post-El Niño. How can CO2 explain that?
CO2 can’t because temperature spikes, nor can it cause rapid cooling. CO2 simply can’t explain the volatility in the temperature chart.
Current temperatures are below the levels set in 1998, 1996, 1990, 1988 and in line with temperatures of 1983. How can CO2 explain that, given its increase over that time period?
Chart #4:
Wow, thermal expansion of the oceans also results in a rising sea level. We can kill two birds with one stone using one single “InsideClimate News” article.
If CO2 can’t cause the oceans to warm, it can’t cause thermal expansion, so it isn’t causing the increase in sea level.
BTW, the sea levels aren’t rising at an increasing rate, so this is a Strawman anyway. Here is the tidal chart of Battery Park at the South end of Manhatten.
It shows no increase in the rate at all going way back to 1850. Sea levels have in fact paused since 1998, and the current level is below the level reached in the late 1950s.
Sea levels BTW sea levels are increasing at a rate of less than 3 mm/yr. Do the math, Manhatten is at no risk of sinking anytime soon.
Funny how “InsideClimate News” forgot to mention that.
Read more at CO2 Is Life
PSD Asks “The article claims that:
“LWIR between 13 and 18µ doesn’t penetrate or warm the oceans. ”
Can you point me to any experimentation or other kind of verification of this, please?”
The graph demonstrating the EM radiation penetration of the oceans is provided in the article. LWIR between 13 and 18 microns are absorbed in what is called the microlayer of the ocean. The surface absorption causes evaporation and cooling of the ocean, much like sweat cools the body. There are plenty of posts on CO2isLife covering that issue. Dr. Spencer has some experiments demonstrating the cooling effect of LWIR on his website. Lastly, H2O saturates the GHG effect for LWIR between 13 and 18 microns in the lower atmosphere, so even if LWIR does warm the oceans, it wouldn’t be due to CO2. That issue is also addressed on CO2isLife in many posts. Just search MODTRAN and the posts will pop up.
The article claims that:
“LWIR between 13 and 18µ doesn’t penetrate or warm the oceans. ”
Can you point me to any experimentation or other kind of verification of this, please?
Most liberals and environmentalists are not interested in “Best Evidence.” They have a political movement to support. The motivations include creating more taxes, expanding the power of government (especially the UN), de-industrialization, and transferring the wealth of the developed to the developing nations. These goals have nothing to do with evidence.
There’s a water heater called the ring of fire. Funny how the weather channel goes on and on about warmest year ever, year after year, then plays lava videos of Hawaii and Guatemala, not connecting the dots. Time to fess up, weather bunnies.
Inside Climate News with connections to Al Bore,Leonardo DiCaprio,Laurie David and the Useless Nations