The scariest scenario of the global warming doomsayers has been the idea that the melting Arctic ice cap would put coastal cities underwater.
‘Scientists in the US have presented one of the most dramatic forecasts yet for the disappearance of Arctic sea ice,’ reported the BBC back in 2007. ‘Their latest modelling indicates that northern polar waters could be ice-free in summers within just 5-6 years.’
Professor Wieslaw Maslowski from the Department of Oceanography of the US Navy predicted an ice-free Arctic Ocean by the summer of 2013.
Maslowski added that his prediction was on the conservative side, too: “Our projection of 2013 for the removal of ice in summer is not accounting for the last two minima, in 2005 and 2007. So given that fact, you can argue that may be our projection of 2013 is already too conservative.”
There are plenty more such forecasts:
‘Scientists in the US have presented one of the most dramatic forecasts yet for the disappearance of Arctic sea ice,’ reported the BBC back in 2007. ‘Their latest modelling indicates that northern polar waters could be ice-free in summers within just 5-6 years.’
Professor Wieslaw Maslowski from the Department of Oceanography of the US Navy predicted an ice-free Arctic Ocean by the summer of 2013.
Maslowski added that his prediction was on the conservative side, too: “Our projection of 2013 for the removal of ice in summer is not accounting for the last two minima, in 2005 and 2007. So given that fact, you can argue that may be our projection of 2013 is already too conservative.”
And:
In 2010, Mark Sereezer, the newly appointed senior scientist at the US government’s Snow and Ice Data Center (NSIDC) in Boulder, Colo. was famously quoted as saying: “the Arctic is screaming.”
But, as with countless other prophesies of climate doom, they were alarmist BS. Cap Allon writes:
This week, Arctic sea ice is approaching 10,000,000 km2 — the second highest ice extent of any of the last 15 years. Furthermore, the years 2008 and 2005 are on course to be eclipsed in the coming days/weeks, as are many from the early-2000s and mid/late-1990s — this means that 2021 will soon claim the title of ‘the highest Arctic sea ice extent of the past two decades’ (since 2001). (snip)
According to the latest data from the Danish Meteorological Institute (DMI), Arctic sea ice ‘volume’ has been on something of a tear in recent weeks — it is now tracking above all recent years (black line on the below chart), and shows no signs of abating:
It’s so cold in the Arctic that:
Two icebreakers are on the way to rescue ice-locked ships on Northern Sea Route (snip)
District authorities in the Russian Far East have decided to commission two icebreakers to aid the vessels currently ice-locked in the East Siberian Sea. (snip)
The commissioning of the powerful icebreaking vessels comes as severe sea-ice conditions have taken shippers by surprise. There are now about 20 vessels that either are stuck or struggling to make it across the icy waters.
But what about the Antarctic ice cap?
That’s not about to melt either:
[T]he South Pole also just witnessed a historically cold winter. As reported last month: “Between the months of April and September, the South Pole averaged a temperature of -61.1C (-78F). Simply put, this was the region’s coldest 6-month spell ever recorded, and it comfortably usurped the previous coldest ‘coreless winter‘ on record: the -60.6C (-77F) from 1976 (solar minimum of weak cycle 20).”
In fact, it turns out that, according to a study released a week ago:
Paleoclimate data indicate there was less Arctic sea ice during the pre-industrial period than in modern times, or when CO2 concentrations were 100 ppm lower than today (280 vs. 380 ppm).
Scientists (Diamond et al., 2021) assert that during the 18th and 19th centuries Arctic sea ice extent minimum (September) values averaged 5.54 million km².
Though modern sea ice losses are often characterized as dangerously low, satellite data indicate the 2002-’06 five-year average minimum sea ice extent was 5.92 million km², which is 0.38 km² above the 1700s and 1800s or pre-industrial (PI) levels. This would not appear to be consistent with claims of unprecedented sea ice losses in recent decades.
Also, CO2 peaked at only ~280 ppm during the Last Interglacial (LIG), which is approximately the same as the PI CO2 concentration. And yet due to the additional 60-75 W/m² shortwave Arctic forcing during that interglacial relative to today, there was “a consistently ice-free LIG Arctic from early August until early October” from about 130,000 to 115,000 years before present (Diamond et al., 2021).
(Polar bears – thought to be dependent on summer sea ice presence to hunt seal – nonetheless survived an ice-free Arctic for millennia.)
Joe Biden and the climate grifters don’t care about the data. They want to spend trillions of dollars converting the motor vehicle fleet to battery-powered electric cars whose power source will be… something.
Not quite sure what. Windmills and solar panels won’t work, and the greenies hate nuclear power.
It’s all a scam.
Read more at American Thinker
Sorry Gore you just struck out
Why do all the climate change conferences fail and all the investments, hopes and efforts around the clock are wasted?
There are many scientists, investors and world leaders, but each is pursuing its own goals.
When they talk about (global warming, carbon, methane, fossil fuels, deforestation, forest fires, the destruction of the Amazon, investment in renewable energy, human food for the reasons they say, generous donations to countries They do not play a role in climate change), in fact, they did not talk about the main issue, which is the Earth’s natural suffocation cycle! As a result, they will still fail if they achieve all their goals. This is because the Earth’s natural suffocation cycle has very little to do with all of these factors!
They do not even know that if the Earth gets ten degrees colder, it has no effect on the Earth’s natural suffocation cycle. Unfortunately, rainfall in many parts of the world (dried colloidal powder beds of wetlands) is very dangerous and accelerates the process of suffocation and extinction of living organisms.
Finally, we all have to worry and look forward to catastrophic days because there is not a single scientist in the world who does have complete information about this natural suffocation cycle! According to NASA, only 10 percent of these particles come from fossil fuels, and the remaining 90 percent come from wetlands.
We are arrogant and intoxicated people now, but we are ignorant and lucky survivors of the past natural suffocation cycles!
https://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/features/Aerosols
The average person never hears of the fail predictions by the alarmists because the mainstream media censors it out.
The warmer temperatures during the Last Interglacial despite a carbon dioxide concentration of only 280 ppm is part of a larger pattern showing CO2 does not control temperature.
Nice to see the Looney Left wrong yet again. I guess in a couple of years they will revert to Climate Cooling if this keeps up. Winters in northern hemisphere seem to be getting colder. Maybe we need some more CO2(sarc)
Hey Greenpeace why don’t take another little trip up there and get trapped in the Ice that’s suppost to be gone take the EDF with you on your little journey