While Extinction Rebellion activists glue themselves to the buildings and roads of London, and the great and the good hang on Greta Thunberg’s every syllable, there is a climate event coming that will affect us much, much sooner than the ‘climate emergency’ that is the focus of so much attention.
Just look at the impact it will have on the UK.
Tens of thousands of people will die. Infectious disease will skyrocket, sometimes with lethal consequences. The sun will disappear from the sky for large chunks of the day – some northern parts of the UK will soon have less than six hours of daylight per day.
Crop production will fall dramatically. Travel will at times be difficult, even impossible. People will flock to shops to purchase protective clothing.
We will need to produce and use copious amounts of additional energy, meaning household energy bills will shoot up.
But the UK is lucky – we will not face the worst of it. In many other countries, conditions will be far more extreme.
Moreover, top scientists have confirmed that this dangerous climate event will happen every year from now on.
Parts of the southern hemisphere will experience similar problems approximately six months later than the northern hemisphere.
This climate event is, of course, winter. It seems ludicrous to describe winter in the terms above, even though everything I have written is true (apart from the need for ‘top scientists’ to confirm its arrival).
The temperature drop from summer to winter is enormous, even in a temperate country like the UK.
According to the UK Met Office, average daily maximum temperatures in London’s Greenwich Park vary from 23.4 degrees Celsius in July to 8.1 degrees Celsius in January – a drop of over 15 degrees.
The difference between the highest temperature in a particular year and the lowest would be even greater than that.
Excess winter deaths do run into the tens of thousands. Colds proliferate, as does influenza, killing a small proportion of the millions who suffer from it.
Hypothermia does still, tragically, kill many people. Indeed, cold weather kills far more people than heatwaves. Some winter crops are produced, but, for the most part, we live off stores and imports.
No wonder that Game of Thrones meme, ‘Winter is coming’, strikes such a chord.
But the reason most people have no reason to fear winter is down to economic development and human adaptation. Of course, that process is not new.
Any society experiencing cold winters would have developed the means to cope or would have disappeared. But the line between survival and destruction must have been a thin one many times in the past.
Now we live in solidly built homes with plenty of energy to heat them. We also have easy transport and good communications networks.
There are always plentiful food supplies unless a strong bout of snow leaves the local supermarket out of bread, milk and fresh veg for a day or two.
We can treat the sick and infirm. Thanks to the advent of cheap electric lighting, the long nights are of little concern.
Clearly, given there are still plenty of excess deaths in winter, there is far more we could do. But we have adapted to winter pretty well.
In fact, many people look forward to it, whether it is the prospect of Christmas festivities or paying a small fortune to get chair-lifted up a mountain to slide back down it on skis.
Adaptation and development are how we have always overcome the harshness of nature. And this is worth thinking about in the context of the panic about climate change.
Extinction Rebellion founder Roger Hallam warns of ‘the slow and agonizing suffering and death of billions of people’ that will apparently result from climate change.
But global deaths from natural disasters have plummeted over the past century. And the global population is booming, despite declining fertility rates, because almost everyone is living longer than before.
There is no reason to expect these trends to go into reverse.
Meanwhile, the policies espoused by the eco-activists would cause far more suffering than the climate change they fear.
The government’s Digest of UK Energy Statistics (DUKES) for 2018 makes clear how much we still rely on fossil fuels, despite the subsidies lavished on low-carbon energy:
‘Fossil fuels remain the dominant source of energy supply, but now accounts for 80.1 percent, a record low level. Supply from renewables has increased, with their contribution accounting for 10.2 percent of final consumption.’
Yet Extinction Rebellion believes we can reach ‘Net-Zero’ emissions – that is, get rid of fossil fuels entirely – by 2025, in just six years. If the eco-worriers got their way, we would face incredible hardship, particularly in winter.
Let’s take a step back and appreciate an incredible human achievement – that winter is no longer anything to fear. And let’s put the panic about the climate into some perspective.
Read more at Spiked
I have asked this before and I will ask this again…
The UN IPCC said that a doubling of CO2 from 400ppm [parts per million] to 800ppm would result in a global increase of temperature of about 2C degrees.
The increase is 400ppm. Right? and that is equal to 1 part in 2500.
That is 1 molecule of CO2 in every 2500 molecules of air.
Again…How can 1 molecule of CO2 “trap” enough “heat” to heat the other 2499 molecules of Nitrogen[N2] and Oxygen[O2] 2 C degrees?
The CO2 molecule would have to be nearly as hot as the surface of the sun.
In the early IPCC days they conceded a 2C rise in global average temperatures was beneficial, while forecasting temperatures well above that. Now observations support an Equilibrium Climate Sensitivity of only about 1.5C, so within the range of what was formerly said to be benign, which destroys the case for current CO2 and energy policies. So, they morph the ‘disaster’ temperature from >2C to <=1.5C, just as they morphed ‘global warming’ to ‘climate change’ when the ~15 year Pause occurred, and morphed ‘Climate Optimum’ (Best Climate, optimum being Latin for best) to ‘Warm Period’.
Orwell’s Newspeak lives.
For the moment ignore the fact that carbon dioxide has little if any influence on the climate. The current climate change dogma states that a rise of 1.5 degrees by 2100 is okay, but 3.0 degrees would be a disaster. Consider this against normal weather where average temperatures differs over 15 degrees during the year. It is obvious the activists haven’t applied common sense in considering these numbers.
Whoever invented seasons was a genius. They prove that climate variation is a great thing and makes life interesting and even fun.
I think they should load up a ship of Extinction what evers and take them to
Antarctica for a picnic where they can glue them selves to a continent of ice by
licking an ice berg .
It’s really not about the earth having a fever its about population control and wealth inequity .
We are in a warming cycle and we should enjoy it while it lasts .
The 1970’s forecasts were earth turning into ice and yet oddly enough the ‘solution ‘ wasn’t pump out a bunch more CO2 . Were people stupid in the 1970’s ? Scientists knew a trace gas would have almost zero effect if natural variables (sun , clouds , ocean currents , volcanos ) all turned the world cold … again .
It is impossible to have an honest discussion on the climate and the environment when people are pumping an overblown fraud .
Fonda means well no doubt .
But the Ecology Freaks want fewer people on the earth in fact some would like to see people go extinct since they think the world would be better place without humans
Perhaps the experience of the Donner party during the winter of 1846-1847 would be a good model for these people. No fossil fuels and cannibalism. Of course, being the elite, they would exempt themselves from these inconveniences.