Since reliable climate records exist only for the past two or three centuries, figuring out what the environment was like before that time is an inexact science.
There’s some empirical data that can be examined, but even that can only be accurately interpreted when cross-referenced with the historical record — diaries, works of art, etc.
For instance, we partly know about the period known as the Little Ice Age because of the descriptions of the frigid weather of New England as described by the Puritans when they arrived in Massachusetts Bay in June of 1629.
Suffice it to say, they weren’t used to seeing ice flows in the ocean in the middle of summer.
Along these same lines, Suzannah Lipscomb has written an article detailing the bizarre climatic irregularities of that same era.
It’s an illuminating read at a time like ours when every environmental event — blizzards, tornados, forest fires, hurricanes, heavy rain, droughts — is blamed on “climate change.”
In February 1540 rainfall effectively ceased, falling only six times in London between then and September. It was not only exceptionally dry but warm: it is probable that the highest daily temperatures were warmer than 2003 (the warmest year for centuries)…
Edward Hall noted that the drought dried up wells and small rivers, while the Thames was so shallow that “saltwater flowed above London Bridge,” polluting the water supply and contributing to dysentery and cholera, which killed people in their thousands.
In Rome, no rain fell in nine months; in Paris, the Seine ran dry. Grapes withered on the vine and fruit rotted on trees. Even the small respite of autumn and winter was followed by a second warm spring and another blisteringly hot summer. Forests began to die until, in late 1541, rain fell and fell. 1542 was a year of widespread flooding.
Just a few decades later, there was incessant rain and years-long dampness across Europe, coupled with extremely low temperatures, with predictable results — four harvests in that ten-year period were complete failures, causing widespread famine.
Shortly after that, in the “Great Frost” of 1607-1608, England grew so cold that “the trunks of large trees split open, and the Thames froze so solidly (pictured) that people sold beer and played football on it.”
A frozen Thames meant no ships entering the port of London, with disastrous economic results, and related civil unrest.
In the end, Lipscomb transitions to a discussion of how this history is relevant today because “the slowly unfolding disaster of global warming means extreme weather events.”
This is unfortunate since she had just been discussing the unpredictable nature of the Earth’s climate. She even admitted that “the warmest year for centuries” was 2003, almost twenty years ago!
But overall, it’s a valuable read, and bears out an observation of our contributor Christopher Horner, who said: “[C]limate changes – it always has, it always will. Of course, saying ‘climate changes’ makes one a ‘climate change denier.’ Go figure.”
Read more at The Pipeline
The climate change movement has the goal of “rapid, far-reaching and unprecedented changes in all aspects of society.” However, they have a problem. There is no real data to justify this extreme goal. One solution was shown in the Climate Change Dispatch article “Why So Many Climate Crisis Claims Are Based On Manipulated Science.” Another solution is to take events that occur naturally and claim they are unprecedented and being caused by climate change. This article shows some types of climate events involved. There are others such as the California droughts.
However, there are true unprecedented events. Consider the power outages in Texas, California, and Southern Australia that were caused by taking action on Climate Change.
Australia’s former Chief Scientist said,
“Take away energy you do not have civilisation. The growth of civilisation has been powered by fuels and new fuel sources. Like a good medicine there’s sometimes side effects, and the side effect in this case is carbon dioxide.”
Imagine a medicine which not only made your body well but made your work way more productive.
Permanently.
If CO2 emissions are a side effect, it’s the best side effect I know for it makes plants grow way faster.
A Chief Scientist should know that.
A Steve Koonin lecture
https://tambonthongchai.com/2021/03/22/steve-koonin-lecture/
They did,nt have any enviromentalists screwballs like we have today no Greenpeace,No EDF,No NRDC,No Friends of the Earth Etc people had more important things to worry about then fake threat of Global Warming/Climate Change
Mar 21, 2021 Worst Junk Science In 2,000 Years
The Guardian claims Europe is having their worst drought in 2,000 years. If their authors bothered to read their own newspaper, they would know what they are saying is complete nonsense.
https://youtu.be/o8lSGf_Kkiw
For a history culled from writings from 2AD to 1900AD:
http://www.breadandbutterscience.com/weather.pdf
When you get to cannibalism in Europe you know times were tough.