After 30 years with no debate and one predictable, repeated lecture, the audience is switching off the channel.
Scott Whitlock at Newsbusters reports that one climate-worrier journalist revealed in a tweet that climate change kills the ratings.
Another tweeter had prodded Liberal MSNBC journalist Chris Hayes to cover more on climate change. “Acting like there is nothing to be done is not excusable.” (See Also: Journos Attack News Outlets For Not Linking All Extreme Weather To Global Warming)
almost without exception. every single time we've covered it's been a palpable ratings killer. so the incentives are not great.
— Chris Hayes (@chrislhayes) July 24, 2018
Those crashing ratings would change overnight if news networks threw open the doors and pitted skeptics against believers in a real televised form of debate.
The spectators would suddenly be able to pick sides — may the best person win. There would be genuine controversy. Sacred cows would be slaughtered, and for a while at least, climate change would rate well.
What stops the media from doing this? Most editors are too scared of being called climate deniers if they dare allow the other side to speak. Look at the pushback when the BBC allowed Professor Bob Carter to do one interview:
The BBC betrayed its values by giving Professor Carter this climate platform – John Ashton, The Guardian
MPs accuse BBC of creating ‘false balance’ on climate change with unqualified sceptics – Tom Bawden, Independent.
BBC staff told to stop inviting cranks on to science programmes – Sarah Knapton, The Telegraph
#Cowards.
Read more at JoNova
Way back in the 1990’s they made a movie called WATER WORLD with Kevin Cosner and some idiot named Mariner with dumb gills and webbing between his fingers like THE MAN FROM ATLANTIS he swam Dolphin Style and looked like a total baffoon the movie was a total bomb
Even the biggest hoax eventually dies, it’s amazing that anyone in the MSM noticed.
The article is dead on that anthropological climate change would suddenly get good rating for awhile if the media allowed debate. However, the article wasn’t quite right when it said, “best person win”. It is not the person, but rather which side of the issue is valid. The climate change is totally fake being fabricated for political reason. It can not stand up to climate realists presenting the strong correlation between solar output and earth’s temperature history and poor correlation of this history with carbon dioxide levels. The IPCC models are deviating from reality more and more each year. It is so bad that NOAA has been fraudulently altering historical data including the exceptional cold weather last winter. The media strongly supports this fraud and isn’t about to let the public be exposed to such devastating information.
The Left has backed some clunkers .
Higher taxes.
Illegal immigration.
Expensive energy.
The extreme left is offering free stuff.
They’re bankrupt.
So they make a Dumb Liberal Sit-Com the Greenies its all about a modern liberal family to quits the modern life to live in a grass hut and live a primative life they go green and wear leaves the show bombs and is canciled after a month because the public though is sucked and it did