• Privacy Policy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
Climate Change Dispatch
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
Climate Change Dispatch
No Result
View All Result

Canada Is The Most Useful Climate Idiot in the World

by Ron Barmby, guest author
September 05, 2022, 7:46 AM
in News and Opinion
Reading Time: 6 mins read
A A
5

Vladimir Putin uses the term useful idiots in reference to enemies who, while standing on their self-perceived high moral ground, make idiotic decisions that actually benefit Russia and unwittingly undermine themselves.

Canada has far surpassed the entry-level requirements for that club with its latest climate emergency policy that helps fund both sides of the war in Ukraine, works against reducing ‘greenhouse gas’ emissions, promotes air pollution, and undercuts Canada’s prosperity. [bold, links added]

We are useful idiots on a global scale.

I am referring to Justin Trudeau’s response to Germany’s request for Canadian liquefied natural gas (LNG) to replace Russian natural gas. Trudeau said he could not see the business case for sending LNG to Germany. Instead, he’s willing to send them green hydrogen.

Green hydrogen is produced with electricity that is generated without ‘greenhouse gas’ emissions. Canada does not currently produce green hydrogen.

Furthermore, natural gas is fuel because it is pre-existing and releases energy when burned, but hydrogen is not a fuel. Hydrogen is an energy carrier (like a battery) that is manufactured using another source of energy, which can store and transport that energy and release it when needed.

Trudeau proposes to produce hydrogen on a wind farm that does not yet exist, have it liquified at a facility that does not yet exist, and transport it to Germany, where neither the facilities nor the demand for significant hydrogen importation exists. This fantasy shipment of green hydrogen will supposedly be realized by 2025 in undetermined quantities at an undetermined capital cost and for an undetermined price.

Even if Trudeau’s plan were possible, liquefied hydrogen is not a good choice to replace LNG for three reasons:

1) Bulk marine transport of hydrogen is in its infancy. The world’s first and only liquified hydrogen bulk transport ship, the Suiso Frontier, conducted its first voyage from Australia to Japan in 2022. In contrast, LNG transport is a mature off-the-shelf technology.

2) While it’s true that hydrogen can be converted back to energy in a fuel cell, fuel cells waste 50 percent of the energy. That’s why Elon Musk has called them “mind-bogglingly stupid.” Are Hydrogen Fuel Cells ‘Mind-Boggling Stupid?‘ – Climate Change Dispatch

3) Hydrogen can also be converted back to energy by combustion but burning hydrogen produces more nitrous oxides (NOx) than does burning LNG. According to the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), NOx can form powerful ‘greenhouse gases’, be harmful to human health, deplete the ozone layer in the stratosphere, and cause acid rain and smog

Note to Reader: Hydrogen promoters are quick to point out that when hydrogen is burned in the presence of oxygen the result is heat and water. This is true, but they fail to point out that when hydrogen is burned in the presence of oxygen and nitrogen (which is 78 percent of our atmosphere) the results include nitrous oxides. Lots of them.

The U.K. Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy reports (in research paper #22) that burning hydrogen gives off “… up to six times higher point NOx emissions compared to methane.” The U.S. DOE Program Plan confirmed in 2020 that the technology to reduce NOx emissions from burning high concentrations of hydrogen is not developed.

This is the same pollutant that Trudeau wants to curtail by reducing nitrogen-based agricultural fertilizers.

Trudeau should seek the advice of the mayor of London, Sadiq Khan, who witnessed a similar issue with the conversion from gasoline to diesel in an attempt to reduce carbon dioxide emissions. Khan stated, “The problem is that governments often fail to grasp that focusing on one issue at a time, such as CO2 output, inevitably leads them to ignore others, such as toxic emissions. The science now tells us that diesel vehicles cause more than four times the pollution than petrol cars.”

One of those toxic emissions Mayor Khan was referring to was NOx, which also contributes to asthma, a medical condition that Khan now has.

Note to Canadians: Canada is the useful idiot and not Trudeau. Just as German voters enabled their energy security to be transferred to Russia as a resolution to the dubious climate emergency, Canadian voters have elected Trudeau three times.

Useful to Russia

As long as there are insufficient natural gas supply options, Europe will be dependent upon high-priced gas from Russia. That Canada is capable of but disinterested in, competing for that market is useful for Putin to both pay for the war in Ukraine and encourage European passiveness by threatening their energy security.

That Canada won’t help by exporting LNG but instead virtue signals by offering to introduce another expensive and undeveloped green energy technology just prolongs Putin’s advantage.

Note to Putin: All it took to initiate the failure of green renewable energy in Europe—thus transferring their energy security to Russia—was a 10 percent drop in wind speed. I bet your engineers told you “Vlad, be patient. Windmill power will fail as a base-load generator. The power they generate is proportional to the cube of the wind speed, so when the wind speed drops to ½, the power generation drops to 1/8 (½ X ½ X ½).” What most people don’t realize is that you orchestrated this with natural gas that you buy cheap and sell dear; a lot of the natural gas transiting Ukraine in Russian pipelines comes from Turkmenistan or other former Soviet Union states, which are landlocked.

Useful to America

Natural gas, which is mostly methane, is fungible; gas is gas. Every methane molecule has the same properties, so the owner is unconcerned if they put a particular molecule into a pipeline and pull a different one out. According to the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA), the latest data for May 2022 shows that Canada put five billion cubic feet per day into the American natural gas system at a price of $5.46 USD per thousand cubic feet.

(This was the net amount of gas exported after subtracting the amount imported from the U.S.) The U.S. liquified 6.3 billion cubic feet of natural gas per day and sent it to Europe. The EIA does not show sales prices, but according to Reuters the price of LNG delivered to the Netherlands in October 2022 is equivalent to $54.70 USD per thousand cubic feet.

The fungibility of methane is undercutting Canada’s prosperity. Or it may be more accurate to say that Canada is undercutting Canada’s prosperity. Of the 6.3 billion cubic feet of natural gas the U.S. liquified and sold per day in Europe, fungibility allows those five billion cubic feet originated in Canada.

The U.S. derives a tenfold markup ($7.6 billion per month) of the sales price while incurring none of the gas production environmental liabilities. The Biden administration benefits as the U.S. taxes and economic spin-off of selling Canadian natural gas to Europe help to pay for U.S. arms to Ukraine, without having to allow increased natural gas drilling in the U.S.

Note to Biden: Thank you for supporting Ukraine with arms and LNG to our European allies. What most people don’t realize is that you orchestrated this with natural gas that you buy cheap and sell dear from Canada. I bet your engineers told you “Joe, this is a gift. The Canadians will take the environmental criticism for drilling gas wells, fracking, pipelines, and fugitive methane emissions and we get the profit. Our cousins to the north have landlocked themselves!”

Harmful to Canada

Let’s make the fungible methane molecule a theoretical one. The path of our theoretical molecule of methane would begin in British Columbia or Alberta, cross North America by pipeline diagonally southeast to the Gulf of Mexico and then be shipped by LNG tanker diagonally northeast across the North Atlantic.

According to the Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers (CAPP), Nova Scotia has the resource potential of 120 trillion cubic feet of natural gas and the province of Newfoundland and Labrador has the resource potential of 200 trillion cubic feet of gas.

That’s enough gas to supply Europe with five billion cubic feet of gas per day for 175 years.

From Atlantic Canada, our theoretical methane molecule would have to travel one-third the distance from the production source to Europe, and the LNG facility would be cheaper to run because of the cooler ambient temperature in Canada.

Resource potential is not the same as proven reserves, but the natural gas potential in Atlantic Canada is immense. The market in Europe is huge and desperate, and Canada is essentially filling most of the U.S. LNG sales to Europe but receiving one-tenth the revenue. Operating an LNG facility in Atlantic Canada and paying the shipping costs to Europe would be cheaper.

Note to Trudeau: We are selling five billion cubic feet per day of natural gas to the U.S. for $10 billion USD at an annualized rate. They are liquifying it and selling it in Europe for $100 billion USD per year. It is unlikely Canada could ever deliver the equivalent energy in green hydrogen, and if we could, either half of it would be wasted in fuel cells or it would create far worse toxic NOx pollution and greenhouse gases than does LNG.

Do you see the LNG business case now? Justin, you should listen to your engineers.


About the author: Ron Barmby (ronaldbarmby.ca/) is a Professional Engineer with a Bachelor’s and Master’s degree, whose 40+ year career in the energy sector has taken him to over 40 countries on five continents. His book, Sunlight on Climate Change: A Heretic’s Guide to Global Climate Hysteria (Amazon, Barnes & Noble), explains in layman’s terms the science of how natural and human-caused global warming work.

  • Truth
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Gettr
  • Threads
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Mastodon
  • Buffer
  • Telegram
  • Email
  • Copy Link
  • Share Using More Networks…

Popular Posts

Electric Vehicles (EVs)

The ‘Green’ Scam Of The Century: How ‘Renewables’ Increase Fossil Fuel Demands

Oct 23, 2024
News and Opinion

Antarctica Is Colder, Icier Today Than At Any Time In 5,000 Years

Apr 15, 2024
Energy

30-Plus Signs That The Climate Scam Is Collapsing

Apr 09, 2025

Comments 5

  1. Sonnyhill says:
    3 years ago

    How much of the natural gas currently flowing to the USA is committed through contracts? Most of it, I bet. That might explain some of the discrepancy in pricing. USA nat gas prices have doubled this year. The companies that own the pipelines are the guys making the real money. With no new pipelines on the horizon, existing capacity is booked far into the future. Because of the limited export capabilities, domestic (Canadian) natural gas consumers don’t have to pay sky – high spot market global prices. There’s price distorting bottlenecks from coast to coast to coast. What happened to the Mackenzie Delta pipeline? The usual suspects blocked that one, 2 trillion cubic metres of gas going nowhere.

    Reply
  2. Spurwing Plover says:
    3 years ago

    My late father wanted to move us to Canada at one time i am glad we stayed here in the USA their in serious trouble North of the Border and their PM just makes things worst

    Reply
  3. Steve Bunten says:
    3 years ago

    Although Trudeau may be the biggest most useful climate idiot I cannot think of a western country that isn’t led by a useful idiot with Biden right up there with the most useful idiot (and useless president). They are all committing economic suicide in the name of “climate change” which is really nothing more than climate scam.

    Reply
    • Sonnyhill says:
      3 years ago

      More than 50% of Americans who voted, voted for Biden. About 32% of Canadians who voted chose Trudeau.
      Conservatives pulled in 33%, but sadly, 18% voted for the NDP, who now are propping up the minority Liberals. 32% plus 18% equals half the voters chose socialism. North America is politically split. I wish that the swing voters would vote for cheap energy. That’s the foundation for prosperity.

      Reply

Comments are welcome! Those that add no discussion value may be removed.Cancel reply

Stay Connected On Social Media

gab-logo

Donate Today

Beating back the alarmist narrative takes time and money. Please donate today to help!

Recent Posts

  • oil rig drillAmerica’s Energy Boom Exposes The Folly Of Britain’s Net Zero Disaster
    Oct 3, 2025
    America’s energy boom and policy flexibility are widening the economic gap with Britain, where high prices and net zero goals are stalling growth. […]
  • Arctic sunsetNew Study Shows Arctic Sea Ice Decline Slowing, Driven More by Natural Variability Than Emissions
    Oct 3, 2025
    New study shows Arctic sea ice decline has slowed since 2012, driven more by natural variability than greenhouse gas emissions. […]
  • Attorney General Rob BontaNewsom Backs Off Climate Fight As AG Bonta Doubles Down On Suing Energy Firms
    Oct 3, 2025
    Two years after launching a high-profile climate lawsuit, Newsom is backing off while AG Rob Bonta doubles down on lawfare against major energy firms. […]
  • Farm irrigationMeteorologist Debunks Reuters’ Claim That Climate Change Threatens Europe’s Resources
    Oct 2, 2025
    Data show Europe’s droughts, weather, and biodiversity issues stem from mismanagement, not climate change, despite alarmist media claims. […]
  • Russ VoughtTrump Nixes $8B In ‘Green New Scam Funding’ In NYC, Blue States
    Oct 2, 2025
    Trump DOE halted billions in green energy projects citing poor economics, DEI hiring, and weak energy impact, sparking backlash in blue states. […]
  • SherrillRising Energy Costs And Dem Green Policies Top Of Mind In NJ Gubernatorial Race
    Oct 2, 2025
    New Jersey voters face rising energy costs as Democratic green policies and offshore wind expansion drive utility bills higher. […]
  • Hochul's green stringsHochul’s Election-Year ‘Inflation Refund’ Checks Can’t Cover Costs Of Her Green Agenda
    Oct 2, 2025
    Hochul’s election-year ‘inflation refund’ checks won’t offset the soaring living costs and utility hikes her green-energy agenda created. […]
  • South Asia monsoonSouth Asia Monsoons Not Becoming More Dangerous From Climate Change, Data Confirms
    Oct 1, 2025
    Claims that climate change is making South Asia’s monsoons more extreme ignore history, data, and other major causes of flooding. […]
  • wildfire carsRick Scott Wants Answers On What California Did With Federal Wildfire Funds
    Oct 1, 2025
    Sen. Rick Scott is demanding answers on how California spent federal money earmarked for preventing and fighting wildfires. […]
  • Biden test driving an all-electric Ford F-150.Ford CEO Warns U.S. EV Sales Could Halve After Federal Subsidies End
    Oct 1, 2025
    Ford warns U.S. electric vehicle sales could drop as much as 5% after the $7,500 taxpayer-funded federal subsidies expire in a month. […]

Get Instant Email Notifications

Subscribe to receive a digest of daily stories, or get emailed once they're published. Check your Junk/Spam folder for a verification email.

Submit a tip

Please enter your email, so we know you're human.

Books You May Like

very convenient warming

exposing great lie

Have a suggestion? Let us know! We swap out books based on your input. We participate in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. See here.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us

© Portions copyright Climate Change Dispatch

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us

© 2025 Climate Change Dispatch

Share via
  • Facebook
  • Like
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Digg
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky
Share via
  • Digg
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky