• Privacy Policy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
Climate Change Dispatch
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
Climate Change Dispatch
No Result
View All Result

Calif. Gearing Up To Win Darwin Award For World’s Worst Energy Policies

by Brian Gitt
April 27, 2022, 2:15 PM
in News and Opinion
Reading Time: 5 mins read
A A
5

diablo canyon power plantUtopian energy fantasies are turning California (CA) into a dystopian nightmare. CA’s energy policies amount to a bold suicide plan worthy of a collective Darwin award.

Traditional Darwin Awards honor people who improve the human gene pool by unintentionally removing themselves from it—like the guy who fatally attempted DIY bungee jumping from a bridge shorter than his bungee cord. [bold, links added]

I propose another category of Darwin Awards for entire groups of people (teams, companies, countries…) whose foolish behavior curtails their existence. Examples include Enron, Venezuela, and the former Soviet Union.

Venezuela, for instance, enacted policies that killed its economy. It went from being one of the world’s richest oil economies to being an economic and political wasteland with 77% of its population living in extreme poverty.

CA has adopted a bold energy suicide plan that will earn it a place alongside Venezuela.

If CA stays on its current energy trajectory, many businesses will close or move out of state in the next 20 years. People will flee, and the real estate market will crash.

CA residents who can’t leave will face higher taxes, power rationing, and limited access to clean water.

Weekly blackouts will likely force households and businesses to pay two electric bills: one to the utility, and another to black-market syndicates that operate diesel-fired generators.

Supporters of CA’s plan complain that it’s unfair to honor CA with a Darwin Award for an imagined future that hasn’t yet (and might not) come to pass. But Californians don’t have to wait 20 years to feel the pain. They’re feeling it now.

CA has the highest poverty rate in America, and rising energy cost is a growing part of the problem.

From 2010 to 2020, CA’s electricity rates rose almost seven times faster than the US average. Over 3.3 million CA households have past-due utility bills that together total $1.2 billion.

CA’s decision to shift energy production to solar and wind has made energy prices soar and increased the fragility of its electrical grid. The unreliability of solar and wind power was among the three primary factors causing CA’s blackouts in 2020.

Things are going to get worse. CA leaders decided to prematurely shut down Diablo Canyon–the state’s last remaining nuclear power plant—even though nuclear power is the safest, most powerful, and most reliable way to generate low-emissions electricity.

Diablo Canyon (pictured) accounts for nearly 10% of CA’s electricity production. Its 2025 shutdown will leave a gaping hole in CA’s baseload power.

Policymakers hope to fill the hole with a mix of solar, wind, and batteries. But that hope is unrealistic for five reasons.

  1. Solar and wind are unreliable. The sun doesn’t always shine, and the wind doesn’t always blow.

  2. Batteries cost too much. CA has only 3% of the battery storage it needs to replace 280 gigawatt-hours/day of natural gas during the summer. CA’s policies depend on a technological miracle to produce cheaper batteries.

  3. Using batteries to back up solar farms doubles the number of solar panels required.

You need one set of panels to supply power to the grid while the sun is up, and another to charge batteries for when the sun goes down.

  1. CA can’t build transmission lines fast enough to meet its mandate of 100% renewable power by 2045. Current grid capacity needs to almost triple in size, but Californians fiercely oppose constructing power lines, which makes building them practically impossible.

  2. The cost of converting the grid to run on solar, wind, and batteries is $500B to $1T. Households will face a hard choice between paying thousands of dollars a month for electricity or suffering energy poverty.

On top of all that, CA’s electric grid wasn’t designed to charge millions of electric vehicles.

But the state will require nearly one million new cars and passenger trucks sold in CA each year to be zero-emission by 2035.

More than 50 CA cities and counties have adopted building codes to restrict natural gas.

Banning natural gas and attempting to electrify everything concentrates energy risks on the grid–a grid that wasn’t designed to shoulder the additional load now carried by natural gas during the winter.

CA currently imports about 28% of its electricity from other states. On hot days, the neighboring states will need the energy themselves, so CA will be forced to cut power to homes and businesses.

Expensive energy also means expensive water. Nearly 20% of CA’s electricity use goes to pump and treat water.

Farmers in the San Joaquin Valley won’t be able to afford to irrigate their crops. CA will go from being the breadbasket of the world to importing most of its food.

CA’s energy policy is supposed to be a model for the world. It is. It’s a model of what not to do. CA’s energy policies all but guarantee high energy prices, power blackouts, and a crashing economy.

These policies are why CA truly deserves a Darwin Award. Every day spent chasing energy fantasies causes unnecessary suffering.

What CA Needs To Do:

  • Renew licenses for Diablo Canyon nuclear power plant

  • End subsidies and incentives for solar and wind

  • Build new efficient natural gas power plants (and hydro and geothermal where possible)

  • Reform regulations and build nuclear power plants

  • Invest in energy R&D

If CA takes these steps, it can avoid disaster.

Read more at RealClearEnergy

  • Truth
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Gettr
  • Threads
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Mastodon
  • Buffer
  • Telegram
  • Email
  • Copy Link
  • Share Using More Networks…

Popular Posts

Electric Vehicles (EVs)

The ‘Green’ Scam Of The Century: How ‘Renewables’ Increase Fossil Fuel Demands

Oct 23, 2024
News and Opinion

Antarctica Is Colder, Icier Today Than At Any Time In 5,000 Years

Apr 15, 2024
Energy

30-Plus Signs That The Climate Scam Is Collapsing

Apr 09, 2025

Comments 5

  1. Spurwing Plover says:
    4 years ago

    Liberal Democrats have the knack of ruining everything they touch or come in contact to Newsom is a Pinhead and so are a ll the liberal Democrats in the Golden State

  2. dave o says:
    4 years ago

    The energy disaster in California is a good reason to roll out this policy to the entire U.S., if the demorats had their way.

  3. David Lewis says:
    4 years ago

    California isn’t a disaster that is to come but it is a disaster in progress. Though originally from Oregon I went to high school, had most of my college, and worked in high tech industry for four years in California. Everyone I knew there and am still in contact with has fled the state due to the impact of its liberal leadership.

    It is a safe bet that the estimated cost of converting the grid to run on solar, wind, and batteries is $500B to $1T is actually higher than the top figure. That works out to $63,000 for the average household if the cost were only 1 $trillion and spread evenly. However, the costs can’t be even. California has one third of the nation’s homeless. It is loaded with illegal aliens. As the article pointed out, the state has a high rate of poverty. As such, the state’s middle class will face a huge financial burden.

    California has the goal of 100% renewable power. They are now at 20% and as such have triple the electric rate of the average state. Moving to a 100% is not a linear cost relationship. Early in the use of renewable energy fossil fuel plants are used to cut in when renewable energy isn’t available. This can’t be used as a state approaches 100% renewables so expensive batteries and expensive extra renewable power to charge the batteries must be used. California is headed for a condition where neither business nor homes will be able to afford to buy power.

  4. Tom says:
    4 years ago

    Only demented liberals claim they know what they are doing.

  5. Spurwing Plover says:
    4 years ago

    Its illegal to hunt moths under the Streetlights in L.A. You will be fined $500 for setting off a Nuclear Device in Chico this is also the same same(Where i Live)thats gives more protection to Mountain Lions and Chickens then they do to the Unborn

Stay Connected On Social Media

gab-logo

Donate Today

Beating back the alarmist narrative takes time and money. Please donate today to help!

Recent Posts

  • Trump fuel standards oval officeTrump Ends Biden’s Heavy-Handed Fuel Mileage Standards To Slash New Car Prices
    Dec 4, 2025
    Trump ends Biden-era fuel rules, aiming to lower new car prices and spur investment in U.S. auto factories. […]
  • paper shredderHuge Retraction, The Usual Playbook, And A Reason For Optimism
    Dec 4, 2025
    Nature’s retraction of a fatally flawed climate paper exposed the usual spin — but also hinted that climate science may be nudging back toward honesty. […]
  • German wind farmEurope’s Green Transition Sends Energy Costs Soaring And Industry Fleeing
    Dec 3, 2025
    Europe’s push for renewables has driven up electricity costs, squeezed industries, and fueled voter backlash across the continent. […]
  • lng tankerEU Red Tape, Climate Rules Hindering Access To American Energy
    Dec 3, 2025
    Rep. Guthrie is warning that EU red tape and net zero mandates are hampering the continent’s ability to obtain reliable American energy. […]
  • Hurricane as seen by satelliteNPR Claims Climate Change Made Hurricane Melissa Worse With Discredited Attribution Study
    Dec 3, 2025
    NPR tied Hurricane Melissa to climate change while ignoring Jamaica’s storm record and relying on a discredited attribution study. […]
  • Biden Warren MarkeyTrump Faces Fallout From Rising Electricity Prices As Dems’ Green Policies Sting
    Dec 2, 2025
    Trump faces backlash as Democrats’ green policies push electricity prices higher, hitting Americans’ wallets this winter. […]
  • Earth spaceTree-Ring Study Blows Up The Stable Preindustrial Climate Myth
    Dec 2, 2025
    A little-known tree-ring study exposes wild preindustrial temperature swings, debunking the myth of a stable climate before modern CO2. […]
  • cop30 protestCOP30’s Climate Circus: Alarmism, Censorship, And Energy Reality
    Dec 2, 2025
    COP30 hailed alarmism, ignored science, and squashed dissent, even as green energy failed worldwide and net zero shackled nations to higher prices.. […]
  • Bill GatesAfter Downplaying Climate Threat, Bill Gates Funds Sun-Dimming Effort
    Dec 2, 2025
    Bill Gates toned down the climate doom rhetoric but continues funding controversial solar geoengineering research. […]
  • data centerAs Voters Revolt Over Skyrocketing Electricity Prices, Democrats Blame Data Centers
    Dec 2, 2025
    Democrats point at data centers as electricity bills surge, but voters are increasingly blaming blue-state climate rules for the cost spikes. […]

Get Instant Email Notifications

Subscribe to receive a digest of daily stories, or get emailed once they're published. Check your Junk/Spam folder for a verification email.

Submit a tip

Please enter your email, so we know you're human.

Books You May Like

exposing great lie

Have a suggestion? Let us know! We swap out books based on your input. We participate in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. See here.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us

© Portions copyright Climate Change Dispatch

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us

© 2025 Climate Change Dispatch

 
Share via
  • Facebook
  • Like
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Digg
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky
Share via
  • Digg
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky