The Hill seems willing to publish almost anything if it stinks of the eco-nuttiness of the hard left, even if it involves comparing the hyped-up threats of climate change to the 9/11 terrorist attacks.
The outlet published a bonkers op-ed headlined, “Climate change is a unifying threat — NATO should enact Article 5 to combat it.”
The author, Deborah Brosnan, the president and founder of Deborah Brosnan & Associates, wrongly named the North Atlantic Treaty Organization as the “The North Atlantic Treaty Alliance” before speculating whether the intergovernmental organization should “consider climate change as a full-fledged assault on our communities, nations, and planet.”
She continued down the wormhole: “[I]nstead of a voluntary pledge NATO attacked climate change under its existing charter to create a secure world, and support allies.
In other words: What if NATO invoked Article 5?” Article 5 of the North Atlantic Treaty, which was intended as a response to armed attacks by hostile states, stipulates:
“Collective defence means that an attack against one Ally is considered as an attack against all Allies.” Brosnan then had the audacity to compare the threat of climate change to that of the 9/11 terrorist attacks. [Emphasis added.]
Pivoting off the “collective defence” portion of Article 5, Brosnan questioned: “At what point does climate change become that unifying threat?”
Brosnan’s idea of climate change as a “unifying threat” included putting it on par with terrorism:
After September 11 — when Article 5 was invoked for the first time — NATO nations united in their response. They acted collectively, shared intelligence, completed missions together, and agreed to specific protection measures.
Brosnan proceeded to hammer the nonsensical comparison and led readers to consider: “So, what if climate change was looked at as a non-traditional ‘terrorist’ attack?”
She continued: “Basically, what many of these significant acts of terrorism or war do, climate change does as well.”
Perhaps Brosnan should focus on getting NATO’s name right before requesting it to entertain her senseless propositions.
But The Hill has had a bad habit of publishing nonsense that caters to leftist narratives. The outlet ran an absurd story in September 2020 headlined, “Analysis: Biden victory, Democratic sweep would bring the biggest boost to economy.”
Conservatives are under attack. Contact The Hill Editorial department at ed****@*****ll.com and demand the outlet distance itself from Brosnan’s nutty comparison of climate change to the 9/11 terrorist attacks.
Read more at NewsBusters
They have been trying to sell climate with 911 fearology for a long time
https://tambonthongchai.com/2021/05/05/climate-change-forecasts-fof-the-year-2020/
Perhaps we can get really clever here and twist the facts enough to justify attacking ourselves! We could prove to be the solution to our own problem. Lets help humanity by destroying humanity’s most beneficial elements.
The Eco-Freaks have been acting like total idiots these days all over the fake threat of Global Warming,Climate Change and they act so irreesponsible over it all.Global Warming/Climate Change is the biggist scam of the 21st Century Its all about Global Government all under the UN control
Oh goodie – the loonies have figured out how to get NATO to attack China, Russia and India for exacerbating climate change.