• Privacy Policy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
Climate Change Dispatch
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
Climate Change Dispatch
No Result
View All Result

Blue State Blunder: NJ Doubles Down On Rate-Hiking Offshore Wind Despite 2023’s Epic Failures

by Nick Pope
January 25, 2024, 1:47 PM
in News and Opinion
Reading Time: 2 mins read
A A
4

offshore wind murphyNew Jersey is starting new offshore wind projects after two major developments effectively failed in 2023.

The state’s utility regulators green-lit two major contracts on Wednesday in a bid to revitalize the state’s offshore wind dreams, months after Ørsted — one of the largest offshore wind developers in the world — pulled the plug on two massive projects off the New Jersey coast in October 2023, the New Jersey Board of Public Utilities (NJBPU) announced Wednesday. [emphasis, links added]

As of November 2023, New Jersey was engaged in a dispute with the company over $300 million the state says it is owed.

The two developments selected are Invenergy and energyRE’s Leading Light Wind Project and Attentive Energy LLC’s Attentive Energy Two Project, according to the NJBPU.

The state is banking on the projects to eventually supply enough electricity to power 1.8 million homes.

Inflation, high borrowing costs, and logistical problems plagued Ørsted’s projects for months before the company decided it had no other choice but to walk away from its investment.

The company previously agreed to pay $200 million to build wind-related facilities in southern New Jersey and set aside $100 million to pay the state in the event it canceled its projects, but the company was attempting to work its way out of those liabilities as of November 2023.

The new contracts are designed to insulate against the risks of future cancellations, according to E&E News.

The deals include provisions that account for inflationary pressures, while also requiring Attentive to put up a $67 million security and mandating that Leading Light put up a security of $120 million.

The newly-contracted projects are also expected to increase utility rates in the state.

Residential electricity rates are expected to jump by $6.84 per month, commercial rates would increase by $58.73 per month, and monthly industrial rates would rise by $513.22, according to E&E News.

One of the two terminated Ørsted contracts would have been about half as expensive for residential ratepayers, according to The New York Times.

Read rest at Daily Caller

  • Truth
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Gettr
  • Threads
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Mastodon
  • Buffer
  • Telegram
  • Email
  • Copy Link
  • Share Using More Networks…

Popular Posts

Electric Vehicles (EVs)

The ‘Green’ Scam Of The Century: How ‘Renewables’ Increase Fossil Fuel Demands

Oct 23, 2024
News and Opinion

Antarctica Is Colder, Icier Today Than At Any Time In 5,000 Years

Apr 15, 2024
Energy

30-Plus Signs That The Climate Scam Is Collapsing

Apr 09, 2025

Comments 4

  1. grumblingthunder says:
    2 years ago

    I would love to show you all the idiotic solar panels our failed state of NJ put up on all the telephone poles some years ago. Snow covered solar panels don’t do very well, and on top of that they drop their accumulated snow on unsuspecting pedestrians and cars. Gotta love it.

  2. David Lewis says:
    2 years ago

    The World Economic Forum claims that renewable energy is cheaper than fossil fuels. Some that have commented on this web site have been very adamant that is the case. Yet, here we have a real world example where transitioning to wind energy will add $6.84 per month to household electric bills. To make it worse, liberals have a horrendous history of under estimating costs, especially for projects that are politically motivate. I expect cost for a home to go up at least three or more times the $6.84 estimate. Don’t forget, according to more than one poll, Americans are only willing to spend $10 a year one fighting climate change.

    • Sonnyhill says:
      2 years ago

      My brother was an accountant for a large retailer, in charge of supply logistics. Lately, he revealed that he votes Liberal and believes that wind and solar energy is free. He doesn’t drink or do drugs. Something sinister got into him, Swiss-cheesed his brain.

  3. Spurwing Plover says:
    2 years ago

    The Blue State blunder heads do everything for the UN/Globalists

Stay Connected On Social Media

gab-logo

Donate Today

Beating back the alarmist narrative takes time and money. Please donate today to help!

Recent Posts

  • pipeline constructionAfrica’s 1,300-Mile Pipeline Rejects Climate Dogma And Foreign Control
    Jan 9, 2026
    A 1,300-mile fuel pipeline led by Aliko Dangote could free African nations from energy poverty while challenging Western climate pressure. […]
  • Scotland’s Biggest Offshore Wind Farm Wasting 77% Of Its Energy, Fleecing Ratepayers
    Jan 9, 2026
    Scotland’s Seagreen wind farm was paid hundreds of millions to shut down 77% of its turbines, leaving consumers to foot the bill. […]
  • trump exec orderTrump Withdrawal From Key Climate Orgs Draws Anger And Praise
    Jan 9, 2026
    Trump’s exit from the UN’s IPCC and UNFCCC sparks backlash from climate activists and praise from supporters. […]
  • united nations mission creepThe United Nations Went From Peacekeeping To Climate Bureaucracy, Abandoning Its Mission
    Jan 9, 2026
    US taxpayers fund a UN climate bureaucracy that has drifted from its original mission: maintaining international peace and security. […]
  • diablo canyon nuclear plantCalifornia’s Clean Energy Math Doesn’t Work Without Nuclear
    Jan 9, 2026
    California’s clean energy goals must rely on nuclear power, despite decades of bans, delays, and political resistance. […]
  • GOP SenatorsNew Scorecard Flags Three Republicans For Poor Energy Voting Record
    Jan 8, 2026
    PTF’s energy policy scorecard penalized three GOP members for opposing key legislation meant to lower costs and support American energy workers. […]
  • coal trainTrump Keeps Several U.S. Coal Plants Running, Defying ‘End of Coal’ Predictions
    Jan 8, 2026
    Trump administration delays retirements of U.S. coal plants as global demand hits record highs, defying ‘end of coal’ predictions. […]
  • vikings chola empireGlobal Warming Fueled The Chola Empire, Dwarfing The Vikings
    Jan 8, 2026
    While Viking raiders struggled in the cold, the Chola Empire thrived in a warm climate — building fleets, feeding millions, and dominating trade. […]
  • trump united nationsTrump Cuts U.S. Funding For 66 Globalist Organizations, Nearly Half With The U.N.
    Jan 8, 2026
    Trump cuts funding to 66 globalist organizations, nearly half UN-affiliated and opposed to US interests. […]
  • ed milibandNet Zero At Any Cost: Britain Presses Ahead As Industries Wither
    Jan 7, 2026
    Britain is pushing net zero by signing onto EU energy rules, raising power costs, and piling on levies as industry continues to shrink. […]

Get Instant Email Notifications

Subscribe to receive a digest of daily stories, or get emailed once they're published. Check your Junk/Spam folder for a verification email.

Submit a tip

Please enter your email, so we know you're human.

Books You May Like

exposing great lie

Have a suggestion? Let us know! We swap out books based on your input. We participate in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. See here.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us

© Portions copyright Climate Change Dispatch

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Climate Change Dispatch

 
Share via
  • Facebook
  • Like
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Digg
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky
Share via
  • Digg
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky