• Privacy Policy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
Climate Change Dispatch
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
Climate Change Dispatch
No Result
View All Result

Biden’s Bureau Of Land Management Nominee Is An Unabashed Eco-Terrorist

by Chris Talgo
July 03, 2021, 12:34 PM
in News and Opinion
Reading Time: 3 mins read
A A
3

tracy stone-manningOf all the people President Biden could have nominated to lead the Bureau of Land Management (BLM), he chose a brazen eco-terrorist who also advocates for population control.

Biden’s nominee for the position of director of the BLM is a woman named Tracy Stone-Manning.

This is the same Tracy Stone-Manning who wrote a graduate student thesis for the University of Montana, titled “Into the heart of the beast. A case for environmental advertising,” in 1992.

Here are just a few of the deranged claims in her thesis:

“The origin of our [environmental] abuses is us. If there were fewer of us, we would have less impact.”

“We must consume less, and more importantly, we must breed fewer consuming humans.”

“It [Livestock grazing on public lands] is destroying the West.”

If those statements were not enough to disqualify Stone-Manning from running the very agency that is in charge of public lands, how about the fact that she was involved in eco-terrorism?

Tracy Stone-Manning arguing that American babies are eco-hazards in her 1992 graduate thesis. (click to enlarge)

According to Sen. Dan Sullivan, Alaska Republican: “Tracy Stone-Manning was a member of Earth First!, a radical, far-left group that has engaged repeatedly in what is defined as ecoterrorism.

“But she wasn’t just a member of Earth First!; she herself was complicit in putting metal spikes — big, thick ones — in trees that were meant to either threaten to hurt or gravely injure those Americans who were harvesting trees, who were cutting down trees legally, who were putting trees in sawmills legally.”

Sen. John Barrasso, Wyoming Republican, added, “Tracy Stone-Manning collaborated with eco-terrorists … She worked with extreme environmental activists who spiked trees, threatening the lives and livelihoods of loggers. While she was given immunity from prosecution to testify against her companions in court, her actions were disgraceful.”

Despite the overwhelming evidence of her radical views and eco-terrorist history, the Biden administration is doubling down on its defense of its nominee.

“Tracy Stone-Manning is a dedicated public servant who has years of experience and a proven track record of finding solutions and common ground when it comes to our public lands and waters. She is exceptionally qualified to be the next director of the Bureau of Land Management,” said a Biden administration spokesperson.

Obviously, that is far from the truth.

In reality, Ms. Stone-Manning would be the most radical BLM director ever, if her nomination is approved by the U.S. Senate in the coming weeks.

According to BLM’s website, the mission of the agency is to “sustain the health, diversity, and productivity of public lands for the use and enjoyment of present and future generations.”

Interestingly, Ms. Stone-Manning’s own actions and views do not comport with the executive agency she is being tasked to lead.

For example, her involvement in eco-terrorism certainly did not sustain the health, diversity, or productivity of public lands.

Moreover, her population control propaganda seems to be at odds with BLM’s mission statement of ensuring public lands are enjoyed by future generations.

Based on her disdain for future generations, Ms. Stone-Manning seems incapable of fulfilling even the most basic functions of BLM’s charter.

Per the BLM website, the agency also professes “a strong history of ensuring opportunities for commercial, recreational, and conservation activities on public lands.”

Does it matter that the person President Biden nominated to lead BLM has a lengthy track record of actions and statements in direct opposition to BLM’s own strong history? It sure should.

The bottom line is simple: Ms. Stone-Manning is both unqualified and unfit for the position of director of the Bureau of Land Management.

It would behoove the Biden administration to cut its losses at this point, admit its mistake, and nominate someone who actually meets the criteria for one of the most influential positions in the federal government.

Unless and until that happens, we will have to hold out hope that enough senators decide to not vote in favor of nominating Ms. Stone-Manning to a position for which she is woefully incapable of fulfilling at the most basic level.

Read more at Washington Times

  • Truth
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Gettr
  • Threads
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Mastodon
  • Buffer
  • Telegram
  • Email
  • Copy Link
  • Share Using More Networks…

Popular Posts

Electric Vehicles (EVs)

The ‘Green’ Scam Of The Century: How ‘Renewables’ Increase Fossil Fuel Demands

Oct 23, 2024
News and Opinion

Antarctica Is Colder, Icier Today Than At Any Time In 5,000 Years

Apr 15, 2024
Energy

30-Plus Signs That The Climate Scam Is Collapsing

Apr 09, 2025

Comments 3

  1. Chaamjamal says:
    5 years ago

    Goes along with the Biden plan to bring renewable energy to low income homes with their home as the collateral. That’s how cruel the green monster is.

    https://tambonthongchai.com/2021/07/05/ghost-of-the-2008-financial-crisis/

  2. Gumnut says:
    5 years ago

    The dangerous sabotage of forestry equipment and the highly dangerous spiking of trees that are to be sawn has been happening for decades and the media side routinely with the lawbreakers. Even when some greenies in Australia broke the Covid lockdown laws (that the media have wholeheartedly supported) to engage in anti-forestry protests, they received no media disapprobation.

    Thus, these protests are now accepted widely. They shouldn’t be. Anyone who has engaged in them should be disqualified from any land management department position, let alone a most senior one.

  3. Spurwing Plover says:
    5 years ago

    Just another radical Eco-Freak which the Democrats like to have in their cabinets like Clinton choosing Bruce(Babbling)Babbit as his Interior Secretary Biden selects from the very bottom of the Dumpster Manning is a Earth First type of person this is no accident its for real

Stay Connected On Social Media

gab-logo

Donate Today

Beating back the alarmist narrative takes time and money. Please donate today to help!

Recent Posts

  • bill mckibbenBill McKibben’s Alarmist Misfire: What Midterm Voters Actually Care About
    Jan 14, 2026
    Fear-based climate messaging won’t sway 2026 voters. Here’s what candidates actually need to say about energy and the environment. […]
  • climate past presentEarth’s Climate Cycles Are Ancient—The Global Warming Agenda Isn’t
    Jan 14, 2026
    Earth’s climate has always shifted, but the Left treats global warming as a permanent political weapon—history be damned. […]
  • polar bear cubsHow The So-Called Climate Emergency Is Collapsing Under Real-World Data
    Jan 13, 2026
    Forests are expanding, species are rebounding, and crop yields are rising—data that challenge the so-called climate emergency. […]
  • Greenland today (left) versus a reconstructed Early to Mid-Holocene landscape, when warmer temperatures left large areas ice-free.Study Finds Greenland 3–7°C Warmer, Ice Sheet Much Smaller 6,000–8,000 Years Ago
    Jan 13, 2026
    A new study finds Greenland was 3–7°C warmer 6,000–8,000 years ago, when large parts of today’s thick ice sheet didn’t yet exist. […]
  • gavel court moneyLawyers Donated To Presiding Judge, Then Won $744M Against Chevron
    Jan 13, 2026
    Louisiana trial attorneys gave $15,000 to the judge presiding over the Chevron case, and later won a $744M judgment. […]
  • Ed Miliband’s net-zero push looms over rising energy bills as wind and solar projects struggle to meet ambitious targets.Ed Miliband’s Net-Zero Zealotry Driving Soaring Bills And Labour’s Collapse
    Jan 13, 2026
    Miliband’s net-zero obsession could spark soaring energy bills and voter chaos, risking the Government’s downfall. […]
  • chevron fuel gas stationChevron Tells Supreme Court Louisiana Coastal Lawsuit Belongs In Federal Court
    Jan 13, 2026
    Chevron wants the Supreme Court to move a costly Louisiana coastal lawsuit from state to federal court, citing federal authority. […]
  • newsom gas pricesAfter Demonizing Big Oil, Newsom Turns To Energy Firms To Import More Gasoline
    Jan 12, 2026
    After years of attacking Big Oil, Newsom turns to the very refineries he once vilified to keep California gas flowing. […]
  • scott bessentSec. Bessent Confirms Trump Admin Pulled U.S. From U.N.-Backed Green Climate Fund
    Jan 12, 2026
    Trump admin pulls U.S. from U.N.-backed Green Climate Fund, saying its goals conflict with America’s energy and economic growth. […]
  • pipeline wildernessTrump Admin Cuts Pipeline And Fuel Transport Red Tape, Promising Lower Energy Costs
    Jan 12, 2026
    The Trump admin finalized federal pipeline and fuel transport rule changes aimed at cutting compliance costs without lowering safety standards. […]

Get Instant Email Notifications

Subscribe to receive a digest of daily stories, or get emailed once they're published. Check your Junk/Spam folder for a verification email.

Submit a tip

Please enter your email, so we know you're human.

Books You May Like

exposing great lie

Have a suggestion? Let us know! We swap out books based on your input. We participate in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. See here.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us

© Portions copyright Climate Change Dispatch

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Climate Change Dispatch

 
Share via
  • Facebook
  • Like
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Digg
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky
Share via
  • Digg
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky