• Privacy Policy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
Climate Change Dispatch
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
Climate Change Dispatch
No Result
View All Result

Biden Is Sleepwalking Into A Summer Energy Crisis

by Washington Examiner
June 02, 2022, 2:34 PM
in News and Opinion
Reading Time: 3 mins read
A A
6

nyc blackoutFor a president whose chief of staff reportedly begins each morning by checking the average price of gasoline, Joe Biden’s administration is awfully dismissive of warning signs that the nation’s electrical grid can’t handle the summer heat.

Last month, the North American Electricity Reliability Corporation, a nonprofit electrical grid watchdog, issued a new report warning that two-thirds of the United States face a heightened risk of power outages this summer. [bold, links added]

Part of the problem is adverse weather conditions. A drought in the West has diminished hydroelectric capacity, and a drought in the Missouri River basin is denying thermal generators the natural cooling they need to stay operational.

But not all of the grid’s troubles are related to weather. Government regulations and taxes designed to reduce carbon emissions have also caused a huge loss in generating capacity from power plants reliant on fossil fuels.

The Midcontinent Independent System Operator (covering a 15-state region extending north from the Gulf through the Midwest) alone has 3.2 gigawatts less power capacity this summer than it did last year, all due to the retirement of fossil-fuel power plants.

“We are headed for a reliability crisis,” said Mark Christie, a Republican-appointed commissioner on the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, noting that utilities are being forced to move too quickly to supposedly “renewable” energy sources such as wind and solar. “We’re just not ready yet,” Christie warned.

For the Democrats on the commission, rolling blackouts may just be the price we all have to pay to meet their party’s carbon emission reduction goals.

“We are in a transitory phase on the electric side in particular of the industry, and we need to address some of the challenges that are associated with that,” Biden-appointed FERC Chairman Richard Glick said.

“I think the argument about going back to the way it used to be 30 years ago, that’s not going to happen,” Glick continued. “We’re moving forward.”

In other words, the Biden electrical grid policy basically boils down to: “Damn the blackouts — full decarbonization ahead!”

From the Left’s perspective, there is a certain logic to this policy. Every ounce of pain that Democrats can inflict on working people is another step toward pushing energy consumers toward a decarbonized future.

Democrats even have polling that tells them this is exactly what voters want. Democratic pollster Stanley Greenberg recently released a survey he conducted for something called the Climate Policy and Strategy Project, which he claims shows that “big majorities” support “major action on climate change despite inflation.”

“The public mostly supports the administration’s priorities and agrees with U.S. climate envoy John Kerry when he says that the war in Ukraine will indeed lead to the United States accelerating the transition to renewables,” Greenberg writes. ”That means moving with speed to clean energy.”

But does his polling really say that? Greenberg asked respondents which statement they agreed more with: “Climate change is a threat and we need major action to combat it” or “The threat of climate change is exaggerated and the high cost of fixing it may not be worth it.”

This question seems to be more about whether climate change is happening at all — not whether the cost of a quick transition away from fossil fuels is worth rolling blackouts.

Who knows? Maybe Greenberg is right. Maybe voters will happily keep their pantry stocked with food, switch to candles, and keep plenty of ice on hand so that their medications don’t go bad — as Biden’s Department of Energy cheerfully recommends.

Or maybe voters will see rolling blackouts as a problem — as yet another Biden-created crisis to go along with so many others, including illegal immigration, Afghanistan, inflation, and gas prices. We’ll find out this November.

Read more at Examiner

  • Truth
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Gettr
  • Threads
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Mastodon
  • Buffer
  • Telegram
  • Email
  • Copy Link
  • Share Using More Networks…

Popular Posts

Electric Vehicles (EVs)

The ‘Green’ Scam Of The Century: How ‘Renewables’ Increase Fossil Fuel Demands

Oct 23, 2024
News and Opinion

Antarctica Is Colder, Icier Today Than At Any Time In 5,000 Years

Apr 15, 2024
Energy

30-Plus Signs That The Climate Scam Is Collapsing

Apr 09, 2025

Comments 6

  1. David Lewis says:
    4 years ago

    Most have experienced short power outage of a few hours. Fewer have experienced long term power outages. Even fewer have experienced regional outages.

    If your landline phone is based on the internet you know it will not work even if you have a generator unless you also have satellite internet. Wired based internet always goes down when there is a power outage. In most cases for a short power outage cell phones continue to work. However, with a long power outage the cell phone towers start to fail as their back up power runs out.

    With a regional power outage you can’t buy gas. The service stations don’t have the power to pump it. If you are relying on a generator to get through the coming power outages, make sure you have enough gas on hand.

  2. David Lewis says:
    4 years ago

    With the high price of gas and inflation at the highest level in our history, you can bet in the 2022 and 2024 elections the Democrats will go full out to get reelected. This will certainly include massive free advertising and lying by the mainstream media. It will also include election fraud on a scale not seen before. In this way blackouts will be a good thing. The blackouts will alienate even more people and make it more difficult for the standard tools of the Democrats to work.

  3. Roger Payne says:
    4 years ago

    The most extraordinary thing about the current hysteria is the constant cry that “we must tackle climate change” or “fix the climate issue”, which is massive hubris, since even the best of scientific knowledge still has little understanding of the vast complex factors of nature, the solar system, the sun, gravity, the large planets, cycles, orbit, magnetic pole shifts etc etc which influence climate on all the planets. Even if any such programme might succeed to a small degree, any such result would not even be noticeable for many decades, if at all. The proposed new “clean” energy plans anyway will cause more problems environmentally than current methods of fuel production. They themselves have the potential to work towards refined methods and new discoveries. Wind and solar are dead ends with huge environmental problems, as well as financial. Dream on, Biden and Kerry etc..

  4. Graham McDonald says:
    4 years ago

    “…“big majorities” support “major action on climate change despite inflation.””

    That’s before the coming summer. A few rolling blackouts, or worse, a breakdown in the system that could result in days, even weeks, of outage, might change the outcome of the poll if repeated.

    The current poll outcome could be a precursor to the mid-term elections. There’s a lot of voters who still aren’t convinced that Biden is bad for the country, and that if he had a democrat majority in the senate he could do all sorts of wonderful things.

    If you don’t like the present situation, don’t forget to VOTE!

    • David Lewis says:
      4 years ago

      “…“big majorities” support “major action on climate change despite inflation.”” Yet, poll after poll shows that the average American is not willing to spend more than $10 a month on climate change. Of all the issues that Americans are concerned with, climate change has consistently polled at the bottom of the list or had such a weak showing that it wasn’t even listed. Pollster Stanley Greenberg is obvious using techniques to get the results he wants rather than show what the public thinks.

  5. Steve Bunten says:
    4 years ago

    “We’re just not ready yet [to go all green energy],” Christie warned.

    And we will never be ready. We cannot power a modern economy on intermittent and such low density power source as wind and solar. Our society would revert to the 19th century life that was both short and brutish with large numbers of people dying from cold and/or starvation. But then maybe that’s what the lefty elites want.

Stay Connected On Social Media

gab-logo

Donate Today

Beating back the alarmist narrative takes time and money. Please donate today to help!

Recent Posts

  • protesters paint sculptureGreen Groups Falter As Trump 2.0 Leaves Climate Movement Scrambling To Regroup
    Dec 5, 2025
    Green groups face financial and strategic setbacks in Trump’s second term, but critics warn the climate movement is already planning its regroup. […]
  • climate emergency banner in empty roomFrom Apocalypse To Apathy: Climate Alarmism Loses Its Grip
    Dec 5, 2025
    The public and liberal voices are turning away from climate alarmism, questioning the need for drastic action. […]
  • ocean wavesNew Study: Rising Temps, Not Fossil Fuels, Drive Bulk Of CO2 Rise
    Dec 5, 2025
    New study shows rising temperatures, not fossil fuels, caused most of the increase in atmospheric CO2 since 1959. […]
  • offshore wind farmStudy Finds Offshore Wind Farms May Raise E. Coast Sea Surface Temps
    Dec 5, 2025
    Study suggests offshore wind farms may raise East Coast sea surface temps, challenging claims they carry little environmental cost. […]
  • monsoon seasonCBS Pushes Climate Panic With False Claims About Southeast Asia Monsoons
    Dec 5, 2025
    CBS News framed deadly floods as climate-driven, but real data show no unusual monsoon trends in Southeast Asia. […]
  • protest climate system changeThe End Of The Climate Cult: It’s Been A Long, Lucrative Ride
    Dec 4, 2025
    Decades of climate panic have enriched activists, banks, and corporations—but now the global warming craze is finally fading. […]
  • congestion toll cameraHochul’s Broken, Costly Congestion Tax Is Squeezing New Yorkers For Little Gain
    Dec 4, 2025
    Hochul’s congestion tolls are costing drivers and businesses big, yet delivering almost no traffic relief. […]
  • Gov. Hochul signs legislation aimed at addressing climate change.Hochul’s Climate ‘Rationing’ Plan Threatens New Yorkers With Winter Shortages, New Taxes
    Dec 4, 2025
    Hochul’s warning about New York’s Climate Act shows how fuel rationing and soaring costs could leave residents facing cold winters and new taxes. […]
  • Miliband wind turbineLabour’s Hidden Green Subsidies Will Add Billions To UK Household Energy Bills
    Dec 4, 2025
    New renewable energy subsidies could add billions to UK household bills, raising questions about the true cost of Labour’s Budget promises. […]
  • Trump fuel standards oval officeTrump Ends Biden’s Heavy-Handed Fuel Mileage Standards To Slash New Car Prices
    Dec 4, 2025
    Trump ends Biden-era fuel rules, aiming to lower new car prices and spur investment in U.S. auto factories. […]

Get Instant Email Notifications

Subscribe to receive a digest of daily stories, or get emailed once they're published. Check your Junk/Spam folder for a verification email.

Submit a tip

Please enter your email, so we know you're human.

Books You May Like

exposing great lie

Have a suggestion? Let us know! We swap out books based on your input. We participate in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. See here.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us

© Portions copyright Climate Change Dispatch

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us

© 2025 Climate Change Dispatch

 
Share via
  • Facebook
  • Like
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Digg
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky
Share via
  • Digg
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky