• Privacy Policy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
Climate Change Dispatch
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
Climate Change Dispatch
No Result
View All Result

Biden-Harris’s $1B Plan To Bring Solar Panels To Power-Hungry Puerto Rico Has Been A Debacle

by Thomas Catenacci
August 09, 2024, 8:03 AM
in Energy, News
Reading Time: 4 mins read
A A
4

kamala puerto rico solar

The Biden-Harris administration has, for years, vowed to deploy thousands of solar panels to stabilize Puerto Rico’s power grid amid regular blackouts, government mismanagement, and ever-increasing residential electricity rates. [emphasis, links added]

But, years after making that promise, a $1 billion program central to that effort yielded only a tiny handful of solar panels, the Washington Free Beacon has learned.

“We’re talking about energy and solar. That’s where the power is, right there,” Vice President Kamala Harris said during a speech in Puerto Rico earlier this year.

During her remarks, Harris touted the so-called Puerto Rico Energy Resilience Fund, a $1 billion fund managed by the Department of Energy and designed by Democrats in 2022 to quickly address Puerto Rico’s electrical grid vulnerabilities via the installation of tens of thousands of rooftop solar and battery storage systems across the island.

That fund has taken a central role in the administration’s plans to, as President Biden said in October 2022, “transform the entire” Puerto Rican grid.

While the Department of Energy declined to tell the Free Beacon how many solar panels have been installed using program funds, Sunnova Energy—one of two U.S. solar firms awarded funding to oversee implementation of the program—acknowledged that just “a small, initial batch” of installations have been completed across the entire island so far.

The other firm, Generac Holdings, declined to comment.

Rep. Raúl Grijalva (D., Ariz.), one of the program’s architects, recently stated that the initial batch of solar installations was completed in mid-July, months after the Department of Energy originally promised.

Grijalva helped insert the program in the 2023 government funding bill, which Biden signed into law in December 2022 after the president called for more green energy funding in Puerto Rico following Hurricane Fiona.

“The island is in the thick of hurricane season and high temperatures, and families on the island continue to battle weekly, or in some cases daily, power disruptions,” a solar industry expert with knowledge of the program’s inner workings told the Free Beacon. “We need to figure out how to move faster.”

The slow rollout of the Puerto Rico Energy Resilience Fund highlights the challenges facing the Biden-Harris administration as it attempts to oversee an influx of billions of dollars in green energy funding nationwide.

It further highlights the ongoing energy-related issues facing Puerto Ricans—in addition to the federal government’s ongoing inability to fully address those issues.

In recent years, Puerto Rico has been hit with several catastrophic storms and hurricanes that have inflicted substantial damage on the island and its power grid.

Democrats have sought to address this damage through green energy programs. At the same time, residential electricity rates have surged, recently hitting an average of 23.77 cents per kilowatt-hour, the Associated Press reported last month, or 44 percent more than the U.S. average.

The media have given little attention to the program because of the Biden-Harris administration’s decision not to provide a progress update on installations.

Energy Secretary Jennifer Granholm and New York Democratic Reps. Nydia Velázquez and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, though, traveled to San Juan on July 17 to trumpet the program but, again, didn’t share information about the number of installations that have occurred.

During the trip, Granholm met with a small number of residents, who she said have benefited from the program, boasting that the funding is life-changing.

“The Department of Energy is focused on ensuring the successful deployment of the Puerto Rico Energy Resilience Fund and increasing energy resilience and reducing the energy burden for Puerto Rican households,” an agency spokeswoman said.

“From its inception, [the program] has centered stakeholder and community priorities for improving local energy resiliency. The department remains committed to working with all stakeholders to accelerate the deployment of solar and storage systems across Puerto Rico.”

The spokeswoman added that the Department of Energy has processed thousands of applications for the program and expects to complete at least 3,000 installations by the end of the year.

Roughly seven months after the Puerto Rico Energy Resilience Fund was established, Energy Department officials announced the agency would release $453 million of the $1 billion earmarked for the program.

Then, in November 2023, the agency released the awardees for that first tranche: Sunnova, Generac, and a handful of smaller Puerto Rican firms. Sunnova and Generac are set to each receive $200 million to deploy the solar systems.

According to the Biden-Harris administration, those systems were initially expected to be built in Spring 2024 and help “achieve Puerto Rico and President Biden’s goal of lowering energy costs with a resilient grid powered by 100% renewable energy.”

The funding is intended to ensure up to 40,000 solar and battery systems are installed on the island.

Top image shows Kamala discussing federal aid, and infrastructure upgrades during a visit to Puerto Rico. PBS NewsHour /YouTube screencap

Read rest at Free Beacon

  • Truth
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Gettr
  • Threads
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Mastodon
  • Buffer
  • Telegram
  • Email
  • Copy Link
  • Share Using More Networks…

Popular Posts

Energy

Professor Makes Stunning Discovery: ‘Absolutely, 100 percent, Offshore Wind Kills Whales’

Jul 15, 2024
News

Scientific Bombshell Undermines The Climate Doom Narrative

Oct 23, 2024
Electric Vehicles (EVs)

The ‘Green’ Scam Of The Century: How ‘Renewables’ Increase Fossil Fuel Demands

Oct 23, 2024

Comments 4

  1. SPURWING PLOVER says:
    1 year ago

    Like selling Heat Lamps in Death Valley

  2. Terry Shipman says:
    2 years ago

    First of all, get rid of the ruling and corrupt Democratic Party that has run Puerto Rico (into the ground).

  3. Sonnyhill says:
    2 years ago

    A really sick joke on poor Puerto Rico. Rubber crutches.

  4. Graham McDonald says:
    2 years ago

    Puerto Rico is a ‘Territory”, not a State … yet. So, no “Electoral Votes” for President.

    Promise everything, deliver nothing. (“Let them eat cake.” )

Stay Connected On Social Media

gab-logo

Donate Today

Beating back the alarmist narrative takes time and money. Please donate today to help!

Recent Posts

  • model v actual worldWhy Climate Science Is Not Settled
    Feb 10, 2026
    Climate models, extreme weather claims, and CO2 assumptions don’t hold up when tested against real-world data. […]
  • endangerment finding shredderHow The EPA’s Endangerment Finding Was Pre-Cooked
    Feb 10, 2026
    How a already decided EPA ruling became the legal backbone of U.S. climate policy—and why its scientific foundation is now coming apart. […]
  • bald eagles nestObama-Funded Wind Turbine Kills Bald Eagle In Minnesota, Faces Federal Penalty
    Feb 10, 2026
    Federal officials say a University of Minnesota wind turbine killed a bald eagle, triggering penalties under federal wildlife law. […]
  • winter cityscapeNYT Admits Observable Data Undercuts Claims Of Worsening Arctic Cold Blasts
    Feb 10, 2026
    NYT acknowledges observable data show Arctic cold blasts are becoming less extreme, despite claims tying them to polar vortex disruption. […]
  • distorted dataInternal Records Show How DEI Mandates Infected Biden-Era Climate Research
    Feb 10, 2026
    Internal records show DEI mandates shaped team selection in Biden-era climate research, prioritizing race, gender, and 'lived experience.' […]
  • biden electric carHow EVs Became The Most Expensive Boondoggle In Human History
    Feb 10, 2026
    Automakers have written down $140 billion chasing EV mandates as taxpayers foot the bill through subsidies and fuel-economy credits. […]
  • chevron refineryMedia Blame Trump For ‘Future Cancer’ Claims From Venezuelan Oil—Without Evidence
    Feb 9, 2026
    Media blame Trump for “future cancer” tied to refining Venezuelan oil, but evidence doesn’t back up the scare. […]
  • climate debriefClimate Debrief: Why Net Zero Fails The Science, The Math, And The Poor
    Feb 9, 2026
    Engineer Ron Barmby explains why net-zero policies fail the science, the economics, and the people they hurt most. […]
  • court outsideFederal Judiciary Yanks Climate Science Chapter After Bias Complaints Grow
    Feb 9, 2026
    A coalition of state attorneys general accused the climate chapter of advocacy, leading the Federal Judicial Center to pull it. […]
  • GMT electric busesOut Cold: Vermont’s Electric Buses Sidelined By Freezing Temps, Fire Hazards
    Feb 9, 2026
    Vermont’s electric buses are sidelined by freezing temps and fire risks, raising questions about reliability and taxpayer-funded transit mandates. […]

Get Instant Email Notifications

Subscribe to receive a digest of daily stories, or get emailed once they're published. Check your Junk/Spam folder for a verification email.

Submit a tip

Please enter your email, so we know you're human.

Books You May Like

exposing great lie

Have a suggestion? Let us know! We swap out books based on your input. We participate in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. See here.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us

© Portions copyright Climate Change Dispatch

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Climate Change Dispatch

 
Share via
  • Facebook
  • Like
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Digg
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky
Share via
  • Digg
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky