• Privacy Policy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
Climate Change Dispatch
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
Climate Change Dispatch
No Result
View All Result

Bernie Wants To Prosecute Oil And Gas Execs, Not Sure What Laws They Broke

by WILLIAM ALLISON
August 28, 2019, 2:26 PM
in News and Opinion
Reading Time: 3 mins read
A A
8

Sanders CampaigningDemocratic presidential candidate Bernie Sanders is out with yet another climate proposal, this time to prosecute fossil fuel executives for causing climate change.

In a tweet, the Vermont senator laid out his plan to go after certain energy companies.

The attack continues on his campaign website:

“Bernie promises to go further than any other presidential candidate in history to end the fossil fuel industry’s greed, including by making the industry pay for its pollution and prosecuting it for the damage it has caused.”

The problem? Sanders didn’t explain what laws these companies have broken. Spoiler alert: Providing affordable, reliable energy isn’t a crime anywhere, least of all in the United States.

Fossil fuel executives should be criminally prosecuted for the destruction they have knowingly caused. #GreenNewDeal

— Bernie Sanders (@BernieSanders) August 22, 2019

But because Sanders personally doesn’t like what these companies do, he believes they should be taken to court.

To achieve this, Sanders would direct the U.S. Department of Justice and Securities and Exchange Commission to pursue criminal and civil charges.

This sets a dangerous precedent of the President of the United States directing independent law enforcement organizations that are traditionally outside the scope of partisan politics to target companies based on the personal preferences of elected leaders.

News flash: that’s not how democracy works. And that’s not how our justice system works.

Walter Olson, a senior fellow at the Cato Institute, critiqued Sanders’ blatant misrepresentation of conspiracies and illegal actions:

Another common belief in the land of #TwitterLaw is that there is a general criminal law against “conspiracy” that floats free of any need to establish the illegality of the planned actions.

— Walter Olson (@walterolson) August 23, 2019

Sanders’ latest proposal hasn’t only faced criticism from conservatives, but also liberals who lament it as “designed to fail.”

Mother Jones columnist Kevin Drum gave the plan a “D-” and said:

“If you’re going to propose a massive, $16 trillion plan, the first thing you should do is get as many people on board as possible. Instead, Sanders practically revels in pissing off as many stakeholders as possible. He’s going to tax the rich. He’s going to hobble the fossil fuel industry. He’s going to ban nuclear power. He’s going to nationalize electric generation and turn it over to the federal government.” (emphasis added)

Even those who oppose fossil fuels acknowledged that Sanders’ plan doesn’t have a leg to stand on. Leah Stokes, an assistant professor of environmental politics at the University of California at Santa Barbara said:

“I don’t think he can back it up with the law. But the fossil fuel industry does need to wake up, and his rhetoric is helpful in that regard.” (emphasis added)

The Washington Post editorial board also rejected Sander’s plan that “elicited eye rolls.” Their editorial said:

“We do not know, precisely, what the most efficient path looks like. We are also certain that Mr. Sanders does not.”

Serious solutions are needed to keep the American economy strong while making progress to protect the environment. It’s clear that Sanders does not offer that.

Instead, he seems intent on releasing unrealistic proposals, making up the law as he goes along, to prosecute those he doesn’t like. That’s a dangerous threat to the American economy and our democratic and judicial systems.

Read more at EID Climate

  • Truth
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Gettr
  • Threads
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Mastodon
  • Buffer
  • Telegram
  • Email
  • Copy Link
  • Share Using More Networks…

Popular Posts

Electric Vehicles (EVs)

The ‘Green’ Scam Of The Century: How ‘Renewables’ Increase Fossil Fuel Demands

Oct 23, 2024
News and Opinion

Antarctica Is Colder, Icier Today Than At Any Time In 5,000 Years

Apr 15, 2024
Energy

30-Plus Signs That The Climate Scam Is Collapsing

Apr 09, 2025

Comments 8

  1. Amber says:
    6 years ago

    Watch a video of a Hitler speech and tell me Bernie doesn’t look the same .
    Screaming and pointing but it’s OK. Bernie is going to lose to the fake Indian first who in tern will be replaced by oh …. Steyer or some surprise candidate brought in to save the party from oblivion .
    The store front manikin won’t even remember what country he is in a year from now . He’s right, he isn’t nuts just way way past his best by date , like two decades .
    Lordy lordy the Democrats could use a little James Comey …. integrity .

    • David Lewis says:
      6 years ago

      Most of the people that Hitler imprisoned broke no laws. The term eco-Nazi has a very true meaning.

  2. Amber says:
    6 years ago

    Really Bernie needs a quiet place and time out .
    Is the Democrat strategy to appear full on nuts ?
    Bernie’s Plan … Nationalize the energy sector , criminally prosecute people who have produced the highest standard of living in a billion years while selling legally available products . Now there is a winning candidate .
    Anyone so completely out of touch with reality is crying out for help .
    Go away Bernie before you waste more money you don’t have .
    Bernie’s negotiation style is to out shout , get red faced and wave his arms around . Hillary dust off your comfy shoes .

  3. Sonnyhill says:
    6 years ago

    Bernie can say anything he wants, knowing full well he’ll never win the nomination, let alone the White House. He’s PO’d at democracy and capitalism. His policies have been gathering dust for one good reason: they fail when implemented.

  4. Spurwing Plover says:
    6 years ago

    Loons,Coukoos and Turkeys yet these Birds have more common sense then dose this nutbar dose

  5. Steve says:
    6 years ago

    And from the posting about Andrew Yang’s plan to fight the non-existent human-caused climate change he proposes not hiring any former lobbyists or executives of fossil fuel companies. Both of these are totally ludicrous. But Bernie’s comes from his Communist roots where private enterprise is hated and must be destroyed.

  6. John says:
    6 years ago

    Good lord, Bernie does not comprehend the huge advantages petroleum fuels has brought to humanity the last 200 years.
    And he wants to ban that?

  7. John says:
    6 years ago

    Good lord, Bernie does not comprehend the huge advantages petroleum fuels has brought to humanity the last 200 years.
    And he wants to ban that?

Stay Connected!

gab-logo

Donate Today

Beating back the alarmist narrative takes time and money. Please donate today to help!

Get notified when new posts are published!

Subscribe to receive a digest of daily stories, or get emailed once they're published. Check your Junk/Spam folder for a verification email.

Recent Posts

  • noreasterAre The Strongest Nor’easters Getting Stronger? What The Data Actually Shows
    Feb 24, 2026
    A climate expert dissects a nor’easter intensification study, showing how scientific uncertainty morphed into media certainty. […]
  • wind farm constructionThe Regulatory Machine Pushing Up America’s Electricity Prices
    Feb 24, 2026
    Decades of environmental rules, misguided regulations, and green mandates shifted risk to ratepayers — locking in rising electricity prices. […]
  • supreme court buildingSCOTUS To Hear Climate Lawsuit That Could Cost Consumers Billions
    Feb 24, 2026
    The Supreme Court will decide whether state courts can impose climate damages on oil companies, a ruling that could affect consumers nationwide. […]
  • electric car house fireElectric Car Fire In Germany Renews Safety Concerns Over EV Battery Risks
    Feb 24, 2026
    A charging station blaze in Schwaigern reignites debate over ferry bans, parking garage restrictions, and lithium-ion battery fire risks. […]
  • nyt EF headlineNYT Cries ‘End Of Science’ After Trump EPA Scraps Obama-Era Endangerment Finding
    Feb 23, 2026
    NYT claims Trump erased government climate authority after EPA scraps Obama-era endangerment finding critics say lacked legal and scientific basis. […]
  • HawaiiActual Honolulu Tide Gauge Data Undercuts Disastrous Sea Level Rise Claims
    Feb 23, 2026
    Honolulu tide gauge data show modest sea level rise, undercutting catastrophic claims built on global satellite averages and public perception. […]
  • supreme court protestClimate Alarmists Howl After EPA Rescinds ‘Endangerment Finding’
    Feb 23, 2026
    EPA rescinds the 2009 Endangerment Finding, prompting immediate lawsuits and fierce backlash from climate activists. […]
  • burning moneyThe $16 Trillion Climate Tab — And The Poor Got Left In The Dark
    Feb 20, 2026
    Bjorn Lomborg says $16 trillion in climate spending delivered no measurable results while energy poverty and preventable deaths persisted. […]
  • school bus yellowEPA Moves To Overhaul Biden-Era Clean School Bus Program After Safety Failures
    Feb 20, 2026
    EPA seeks reforms to Biden-era Clean School Bus Program after electric buses bought with tax dollars proved unreliable and unsafe. […]
  • india coal miningIndia Doubles Down On Coal And Natural Gas As Climate Goals Recede
    Feb 20, 2026
    India expands coal power and deepens U.S. LNG trade while pushing net-zero to 2070, signaling where global energy policy is really headed. […]

Submit a tip

Please enter your email, so we know you're human.

Books You May Like

Climate prn book

exposing great lie

Have a suggestion? Let us know! We swap out books based on your input. We participate in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. See here.

  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA Policy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us

© Portions copyright Climate Change Dispatch

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Climate Change Dispatch

 
Share via
  • Facebook
  • Like
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Digg
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky
Share via
  • Digg
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky