• Privacy Policy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
Climate Change Dispatch
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
Climate Change Dispatch
No Result
View All Result

Australia’s Big Four Banks Are On An Anti-Coal Crusade

by Michael Baume
July 08, 2021, 2:35 PM
in News and Opinion
Reading Time: 4 mins read
A A
6

coal mineIt’s a seriously damaging discriminatory attack by the big four banks (and insurance companies) on Australian-owned companies that are major suppliers of Australia’s second-biggest export earner – and a key element in sustaining regional Australia – coal.

The consequences of this mounting ideology-driven costly assault had received little media attention until a current parliamentary inquiry into export funding revealed an emerging crisis.

The banks’ clearly stated environmental purposes in declaring coal ‘black’ are not only to damage Australia’s export earning capacity as the nation struggles to recover from the Covid-19 recession, but also to destroy Australian-owned coal-mining companies by withdrawing all funding while leaving foreign-owned and multinational companies, financed by foreign banks, to take over the entire market sending their profits overseas.

Initially aimed at miners providing thermal coal not only for export but also for local power generation, it thereby undermines the Morrison government’s policy of keeping affordable reliable fossil-fuelled base-load domestic power available until technology replaces it, hopefully by 2050.

But the banks’ ideologically-based decision to exit coal totally by 2030 pre-empts the government’s non-disruptive program by 20 years.

Worse, it is already well underway with Shayne Elliott, the chief executive of ANZ (formerly the sector’s biggest local lender) boasting that he was proud that ‘the bank had not lent a dollar to any coal miners’ since his appointment five years ago.

So the boards of directors of the big four Australian banks are seeking personal and corporate public accolades for environmental purity at the expense of shareholders who are missing out on what has in recent years been a major source of bank profits.

While depriving coal companies (and their local regional suppliers and contractors and even their vehicle fleets) of funding, the banks are hypocritically happy to enjoy the profitable benefits of their local transactional banking business.

That their consequential economic demolition of so many regional centers dependent on coal mining is in conflict with the government’s emphasis on developing regional Australia, adds yet another dimension to the Australian banks’ ideology-led contribution to damaging our emergence from recession – and gives the banks another reason to close more regional branches.

To put sour icing on this unpalatable cake, the local insurance industry and sanctimonious investment fund managers (of other people’s money – especially in industry superannuation funds) have also banned coal.

As the anti-emissions logic behind the attack on coal applies equally to gas and oil as fellow fossil fuels, both vital elements in our export and local energy markets, they are clearly next for the chop.

If the fact that Australian higher quality coal’s capacity to reduce (but not cease) emissions in foreign HELE generators do not justify it being funded, how can the banks continue to justify (and to fund) gas on the very same basis that it also reduces (but does not cease) emissions.

Of added significance to the local banks’ ban is that funding of major coal projects is generally done in international syndicates, with foreign banks willing participants provided local banks are also involved, on the grounds that the locals will have a better idea of the merit of the proposal.

Foreign potential funders have already indicated their unwillingness to participate without local bank participation, whereas they may support their own foreign-owned projects without the need for local bank participation.

There is some truth in the claim by anti-coal activists that (their successful) pressure on the banks is also coming from governmental regulators like the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority: ‘finance sector regulators have repeatedly warned that climate change poses system-wide risks’.

But the absurdity of the banks’ claim that concern about the risk of ‘stranded assets’ as coal is killed off is a factor in their anti-coal crusade, is evidenced by the revelations in the latest International Energy Agency outlook indicating continuing strong coal demand in the Asia/Pacific region which accounts for more than 80 percent of world usage.

This is expected to rise to 7.4 billion tonnes per annum (the declining Europe and the US markets that account for less than 10 percent have little impact on the total).

To meet that demand, IEA expects a pipeline of new projects (more than a third in Australia, a quarter in Russia, and one-fifth in South Africa).

Australia, although the world’s biggest exporter, currently provides only a fraction of Asia/Pacific thermal coal demand; its relatively lower-emissions higher-quality coal is increasingly being sought by regional nations in their pursuit of lower emissions targets.

So the Australian banks’ jihad on coal is also an attack on regional nations’ emissions-reduction campaigns.

As Australian-owned Whitehaven Coal noted in its submission to the parliamentary inquiry, the IEA forecasts that Southeast Asia will experience growth of nearly 30 percent over the next decade, bringing with it continuing demand for Australian lower-emissions coal to be burned in the more than $1 trillion of capital invested in existing coal-fired generation, much of it in young HELE plants with many years of economic life ahead.

And many more HELEs are either planned or under construction in the region.

While there is still strong long-term global demand, the NSW government’s Strategic Statement on Coal Exploration and Mining has stated that ending or reducing Australian thermal coal exports would not lower global carbon emissions, as most coal consumers would seek coal from elsewhere and much of this would be lower quality – worsening the world’s emissions.

But it took the submission by a major foreign-owned coal company, Yancoal, to demonstrate the basic absurdity of the banks’ ban, which relates more to the far greater emissions in foreign countries by the almost 90 percent of Australian coal production that is exported than to those emitted in local Australian power generation or steel production.

For the banks to penalize Australian miners for emissions in other countries for which those nations are responsible under international agreements is not only irrational, it is in conflict with government policy.

As Energy Minister Angus Taylor said last month, ‘Our prosperity will be undermined if we pursue decarbonization at the expense of reliable and affordable energy. It is a folly to think that we can reduce emissions by restricting coal or gas exports.

This won’t reduce global demand for those products. Until clean energy solutions are cheaper than their existing alternatives, any supply gap will be filled by our competitors.’

Tell that to the big four banks, the insurance industry – and to the government’s own financial regulatory authorities.

Read more at Spectator AU

  • Truth
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Gettr
  • Threads
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Mastodon
  • Buffer
  • Telegram
  • Email
  • Copy Link
  • Share Using More Networks…

Popular Posts

Electric Vehicles (EVs)

The ‘Green’ Scam Of The Century: How ‘Renewables’ Increase Fossil Fuel Demands

Oct 23, 2024
News and Opinion

Antarctica Is Colder, Icier Today Than At Any Time In 5,000 Years

Apr 15, 2024
Energy

30-Plus Signs That The Climate Scam Is Collapsing

Apr 09, 2025

Comments 6

  1. Gumnut says:
    4 years ago

    The conservative salivating over the return of Barnaby Joyce to the leadership of the federal National Party and, thus, the position of Deputy Prime Minister was ridiculous.

    Joyce will make the right noises no doubt but, as leader of the Nationals, he holds the office of Deputy PM in name only. The National Party is itself infected with the anti-coal madness at rank and file and state and federal parliamentary levels anyway.

    Ex-Liberal MP, Craig Kelly, the most consistent and honourable coal supporter in the House of Representatives would not move to the Nationals as he would still have been bound by the Coalition rules. Hence, he now sits as an independent.

    The only Australian party with any sort of federal vote that supports coal sufficiently is One Nation. Senator Malcolm Roberts, in particular, is to be commended for his work in this area.

    Reply
  2. Macha says:
    4 years ago

    Pity…better science is out there. CO2 is not the concern.
    https://reality348.wordpress.com/2021/07/09/all-ye-promoters-of-erratic-sources-of-energy-come-now-repent-and-be-forgiven/

    Reply
  3. brian doherty says:
    4 years ago

    Whats happening ? These are supposed to be intelligent CEOs can they not read the true facts on the webb or are they being swayed by bigger profits if carbon taxes are imposed on the idiot tax paying workers who keep them.Morrison and his deciples are up to their necks in it and i hope they loose the next election as they deserve to loose and they are now no different from labor and the greens. We now have three socialist parties in Australia ,

    Reply
  4. Rowan Parmiter says:
    4 years ago

    I live in Sydney and Im a shareholder in 3 of the 4 big banks. Im very much against this (ANZ, NAB, Westpac)…
    But they dont ask if we consent or not. We are a very PC society. Mostly the media is leftist controlled….
    Im not happy

    Reply
  5. Spurwing Plover says:
    4 years ago

    Their making a big time mistake once again allowing Politics and Fake Crisis and Eco-Freak stupidity to get in the way of their Common Sense

    Reply
  6. John Shewchuk says:
    4 years ago

    Then why do they do business with China … https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b1Iu9D5RhqQ

    Reply

Comments are welcome! Those that add no discussion value may be removed.Cancel reply

Stay Connected On Social Media

gab-logo

Donate Today

Beating back the alarmist narrative takes time and money. Please donate today to help!

Recent Posts

  • Wind farm constructionIn The Name Of ‘Green’ Energy, Wind Farms Are Devastating Natural Habitats
    Oct 6, 2025
    Wind farms touted as green energy are triggering soil erosion, insect collapse, and biodiversity loss, raising doubts about their true environmental cost. […]
  • Pope Leo ice blessingPope Leo Joins Climate Cultists In Bizarre Ice-Blessing Ritual, Betrays Church’s Mission
    Oct 6, 2025
    Pope Leo joined climate cultists in a strange ice-blessing ceremony, sparking backlash from Christians and raising questions about Catholic priorities. […]
  • Abigail SpanbergerReport: Spanberger Winning Virginia Governor’s Race Would Add $500M a Year to Electricity Bills
    Oct 6, 2025
    Abigail Spanberger’s plan to rejoin the RGGI could add $500M a year to Virginia electricity bills, while Earle-Sears opposes any carbon tax. […]
  • Wall Street financial districtUN-Backed Net-Zero Banking Alliance Shutters, Dealing Blow To ESG Activists
    Oct 6, 2025
    The Net-Zero Banking Alliance has shut down as banks exit, sparking ESG activist backlash over fossil fuel projects and climate goals. […]
  • Massive Amazon deforestation for COP30 roadCOP30’s Carbon Circus: Elites Show Everything That’s Wrong With Climate Alarmism
    Oct 6, 2025
    Skyrocketing costs, private jets, and rainforest destruction expose the hypocrisy surrounding this year’s COP30 climate summit in Brazil. […]
  • oil rig drillAmerica’s Energy Boom Exposes The Folly Of Britain’s Net Zero Disaster
    Oct 3, 2025
    America’s energy boom and policy flexibility are widening the economic gap with Britain, where high prices and net zero goals are stalling growth. […]
  • Arctic sunsetNew Study Shows Arctic Sea Ice Decline Slowing, Driven More by Natural Variability Than Emissions
    Oct 3, 2025
    New study shows Arctic sea ice decline has slowed since 2012, driven more by natural variability than greenhouse gas emissions. […]
  • Attorney General Rob BontaNewsom Backs Off Climate Fight As AG Bonta Doubles Down On Suing Energy Firms
    Oct 3, 2025
    Two years after launching a high-profile climate lawsuit, Newsom is backing off while AG Rob Bonta doubles down on lawfare against major energy firms. […]
  • Farm irrigationMeteorologist Debunks Reuters’ Claim That Climate Change Threatens Europe’s Resources
    Oct 2, 2025
    Data show Europe’s droughts, weather, and biodiversity issues stem from mismanagement, not climate change, despite alarmist media claims. […]
  • Russ VoughtTrump Nixes $8B In ‘Green New Scam Funding’ In NYC, Blue States
    Oct 2, 2025
    Trump DOE halted billions in green energy projects citing poor economics, DEI hiring, and weak energy impact, sparking backlash in blue states. […]

Get Instant Email Notifications

Subscribe to receive a digest of daily stories, or get emailed once they're published. Check your Junk/Spam folder for a verification email.

Submit a tip

Please enter your email, so we know you're human.

Books You May Like

very convenient warming

exposing great lie

Have a suggestion? Let us know! We swap out books based on your input. We participate in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. See here.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us

© Portions copyright Climate Change Dispatch

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us

© 2025 Climate Change Dispatch

Share via
  • Facebook
  • Like
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Digg
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky
Share via
  • Digg
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky