The White House on Thursday faced a barrage of questions about whether President Biden is doing enough to address record gas prices after he skipped a summit with oil executives and instead met with wind-industry leaders.
“When I think environment, I think jobs,” Biden told a group that included five wind-industry CEOs in the White House Roosevelt Room — shortly after a summit nearby that Biden refused to attend with seven oil CEOs and Energy Secretary Jennifer Granholm. [bold, links added]
“We’re about to build a better America,” Biden said at the wind-power meeting, which included Granholm, Interior Secretary Deb Haaland, and Govs. Phil Murphy (D-NJ) and John Carney (D-Del.).
Biden mistakenly held up backward a detailed note prepared by his staff for the wind meeting. It instructed him to “say hello to participants” and then “take YOUR seat” before giving “2 minutes” of remarks.
The staff note instructed the president to “ask Liz Shuler, President, AFL-CIO, a question” and then “thank participants” and leave.
At the daily White House briefing, reporters called out the awkward juxtaposition of energy events as high fuel costs contribute to the worst inflation since 1981 and send Biden’s approval rating to new lows.
“Why did the president stop by the wind executives meeting? Why didn’t he spend some time with the oil executives as well?” Associated Press reporter Aamer Madhani asked White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre.
Jean-Pierre defended Biden’s meeting with wind executives as “part of his schedule.”
“The president — it was a stop by. This is something that he does very often,” Jean-Pierre said. “It was — there were governors in that meeting who were virtual and in-person. So we see this as a part of his schedule where there was actually a meeting here at the White House.”
Fox News correspondent Peter Doocy picked up the line of questioning, asking Jean-Pierre of the wind executive meeting, “How did that help lower gas prices?”
“The president has done a — so let me step back for a second,” Jean-Pierre began her answer before Doocy interrupted to press his point.
“No, no, no,” Doocy interjected. “By meeting with offshore wind folks and not with oil and gas CEOs, how does that lower gas prices? You said he’s done everything in his power. They were a mile away.”
Jean-Pierre said, “I just want to take us back a second on how we got here.” She noted that gas prices are up about $2 per gallon since Russia’s Feb. 24 invasion of Ukraine and noted that Biden previously ordered the release of a million barrels per day from the Strategic Petroleum Reserve and allowed a higher proportion of ethanol in gas over the summer, though neither step lowered prices.
“The president is trying to figure out and take steps on how we can take, bring the gas prices down,” Jean-Pierre said. “And we have a high level of oil production. So what we are asking the oil refinery companies to do is to take that production — turn it into, refine that oil so that there is capacity. We are not at capacity right now. And it does matter that the secretary of energy, which is her purview, that is her portfolio, to meet with these oil execs, that she does on a pretty regular basis —”
Doocy followed up by asking if Biden’s wind-power meeting implied that he believes people must choose between buying an electric car or paying high gas prices.
“Is that the choice: $5 a gallon gas or a $61,000 electric car?” he asked.
“That’s apples and oranges, that is not the same,” Jean-Pierre said, before pivoting to note that Biden on Wednesday asked Congress to temporarily waive the federal gas tax of 18.3 cents per gallon — though the idea received a cool reception from members of both political parties.
“What we’re trying to do right now is to deal with an acute problem right now, which is why the president, again, again asked for a 90-day suspension of the gas tax — a gas tax holiday — that is going to make a difference,” Jean-Pierre said.
“Peter, we’re talking about 18 cents on the federal level. We’re talking about an average of 30 cents on the state level. And if the oil refinery [sic] does their job, if they do what we’re asking them to do, which is put their profits back in so that gas prices can go down, that’s almost $1 per gallon. That matters. This matters to teachers, that matters to home health care aides, that matters to construction workers, that matters to plumbers, that matters to lifeguards. Those are the people that — and many others — who are going to feel this in a way that will give them relief at the pump.
“All right, we’re done,” Jean-Pierre cut off Doocy before calling on a different reporter.
Later in the briefing, Jean-Pierre was pressed by other reporters on what exactly Biden would be willing to do to help oil refiners produce more gasoline.
CNN reporter Phil Mattingly asked about the fact that refiners are “operating at about 93, 94% capacity.” She maintained, “there’s a difference between the share of existing capacity being utilized and the amount of total capacity available.”
New York Times reporter Zolan Kanno-Youngs pointed out that some oil refiners faced regulatory hurdles, such as a refinery in the Virgin Islands that has a troubled environmental record.
“Will the administration consider loosening any permitting regulations for refineries that have had environmental concerns to expand capacity?” he asked.
“I don’t have anything to share” on that point, Jean-Pierre said. “All I can say is the president is willing to use his executive authority to do what he can to give relief to the American public.”
The average price of a gallon of regular gas is about $5, according to AAA.
Renewable sources such as wind, meanwhile, make up a relatively small share of US energy production.
In 2021, wind power comprised just 3.3% of US energy production, according to the US Energy Information Administration.
CEOs at the wind-power meeting with Biden included Liz Burdock of the Business Network for Offshore Wind, David Hardy of Ørsted Offshore North America, Robert Blue of Dominion Energy, Jeffrey Grybowski of US Wind, and Lars Pedersen of Vineyard Offshore.
Dominion Energy, based in Virginia, has a broad portfolio of electricity sources, including nuclear, coal, and natural gas.
Oil industry executives said Thursday afternoon that they were encouraged by their lower-profile meeting with Granholm.
“Secretary Granholm’s meeting with American refiners today was a constructive discussion about ways to address rising energy costs and create more certainty for global energy markets, a joint oil-industry statement said afterward.
The American Petroleum Institute and American Fuel & Petrochemical Manufacturers went on, “While these challenges and their causes are complex—from Russia’s war in Ukraine to market imbalances leftover from COVID—productive outcomes today should send a positive signal to the market that the U.S. is committed to long-term investment in a strong U.S. refining industry and aligning policies to reflect that commitment.”
Biden told reporters on Monday that he would not meet with the oil industry leaders, even though he’s attempted to blame them for high prices.
The president has alleged that the industry isn’t drilling or refining enough and accused them of profiteering, sparking a war of words.
Chevron CEO Michael Wirth, who leads the country’s second-largest oil company, on Tuesday wrote in an open letter that data contradict Biden’s claims regarding the industry not drilling or refining enough.
“In 2021, Chevron produced the highest volume of oil and gas in our 143-year history. In the first quarter of 2022, our U.S. production was 1.2 million barrels per day, up 109,000 barrels per day from the same quarter a year earlier,” Wirth wrote.
“In the Permian Basin [centered in West Texas] alone, we expect production to approach 750,000 barrels per day by the end of the year, an increase of more than 15 percent from 2021,” Wirth added.
“And Chevron’s U.S. refinery input grew to 915,000 barrels per day on average in the first quarter of this year from 881,000 in the same quarter last year.”
Biden responded Tuesday by mocking Wirth as “mildly sensitive.”
“We need more refining capacity. This idea that they don’t have oil to drill and to bring up is simply not true,” Biden said Tuesday, responding to Wirth. “We ought to be able to work something out whereby they’re able to increase refining capacity and still not give up on transitioning to renewable energy.”
High gas prices are contributing to the highest inflation rate since 1981, though Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell said Wednesday that “inflation was high before — certainly before the war in Ukraine broke out.”
Biden on Wednesday appealed to gas station owners to unilaterally lower prices at the pump. About 60% of US pumping stations are owned by a person or family that operates just one location.
Republicans say Biden contributed to the gas-price crisis by seeking to impose a moratorium last year on new oil drilling on public lands and by spiking new oil pipeline projects, including the Keystone XL pipeline from Canada.
Read more at NY Post
That is not a “fact” about the number of studies predicting cooling actually. In the 60s and 70s, when climate science was in its infancy, about 15% of the studies published then were about cooling, about 40% were of warming and the rest were ambivalent.
Very dirty industry at that time was blocking incoming solar radiation and the relatively small amount of CO2 was yet to overwhelm that smog with its increased solar absorption and re-radiation back to the earth’s surface.
Since the 1990s, the number of studies (now exponentially larger in number) has about as many studies predicting cooling as the number of fingers on an epileptic butcher.
Indeed, but the deniers trot it out endlessly as if it proves anything other than the fact they have problems/
I found this to be good overall picture
https://journals.ametsoc.org/view/journals/bams/89/9/2008bams2370_1.xml
Excellent.
I am sure that you have already found out by now that the group of “intellectuals” who inhabit this site wouldn’t even know where to find a peer-reviewed climate study much less understand what it says.
As I noted before, I was once where you are now – constantly defending science against a swarm of conspiracy-driven lunatics. It got tiresome.
Of course, climate science continues to improve and gets proven right year after year and it appears to be making a dent in the number of denialists as there are now far fewer people who visit this site. So few in fact, that I wonder how it even stays in business. I figure it must be subsidized by the fossil fuel industry.
Anyway, keep up the good fight. I enjoy reading your comments.
“In 2021, wind power comprised just 3.3% of US energy production, according to the US Energy Information Administration.” Which is a disgrace.
In the UK electricity generation from wind power increased by 715% from 2009 to 2020 and wind energy generation accounted for 24% of total electricity generation (including renewables and non-renewables) in 2020.
Why is the USA so backward?
“high fuel costs contribute to the worst inflation since 1981 ” Why not also tell us what the profits are for the FF industries?
BP profits soar to $6.2bn (£4.9bn) compared to $2.6bn in the same period last year
Shell profits nearly triple as oil prices surge. Shell made $9.13bn (£7.3bn) in the first three months of the year, nearly triple its $3.2bn profit it announced for the same period last year. But the firm said pulling out of Russian oil and gas due to the Ukraine conflict had cost it $3.9bn (£3.1bn).
BP and Shell have both spent billions recently on what are called share buybacks, which is what companies do when they have money they can afford to spend on boosting their share price.
So the FF firms are making exorbitant profits, why aren’t you highighting that?
The fact that back in the 1970’s it was Global Cooling and New Ice Age was coming liberal rags like Time and Newsweek was giving it Top Coverage its just their keeping the facts from us with all this fake news
The fact that you are still harping on about that non story is rather sad.
“its just their keeping the facts from us with all this fake news” Which fake news is that? Or are you now accepting they got that wrong and AGW was the real problem but they somehow missed that? And all the deniers were howling and baying that AGW was a lie, because they never bother reading science, and still don’t, they only go for junk science like this channel.
You mean like Murdoch hasn’t been telling you about the massive profits FF firms make and how much they have been subsidised?
You keep harping on the false lies that climate warming is all man made and man can control it, so let’s not throw stones at others for the very things you are guilty of.
Stick to climate. I’ve read several of your posts and on the energy front. I think you are quite a bit off the mark. Fact is, fossil fuels provide 80% of our primary energy and there is no current (feasible) replacement you can demonstrate that can be fully implemented for quite a while. The EIA 2022 energy outlook is a good source to back my statement. The energy transition has no EASY button. Vilifying energy PROVIDERS serves no real constructive purpose. BTW. Tax incentives such as deductions for intangible drilling costs are not oil industry subsidies. Those private companies are risking shareholder money, not taxpayer dollars. You might (also) be interested that the average rate of return on investment within the oil & gas industry falls in the 6-8% range. Very much in the “middle” among manufacturers. Definitely paltry compared to tech firms & pharmaceuticals. Plenty of data out there to support that observation….
The Flat Earth bunch of screwballs and lunatics Greenpeace still fuels its ships and Zodiacs with Fossil Fuels the Audubon Society tried to Ditch Birds Greenpeace was founded with good reasons(Save the Whales)but has since then has gone radical and Bruce Babbit Clinton’s Interior Secretary belong to the League of Conservation Voters
“The Flat Earth bunch of screwballs” So you agree you are as well then as you have exactly the same attributes. Thanks for admitting what you are.
Maybe you should calm down and then learn English as your babblings are not what one would term rational or reasonable English.
And rather than your infantile insults why not produce some science?
did you know several [;over species are facing extinction because of loss of habitat? And one of the main areas in which Greenpeace is active is preventing loss of habitat. Of course you don;t, because your masters don’t tell you.
As for the use of FF, if the FF interests and their tame politicians and media had not lied and lied (as is still happening in the articles on this site) we would now have other forms of propulsion, but they conned the gullible, didn’t they.
David, you critically malign others for their comments / views while you don’t seem to see the contradictions in your own remarks. EG: As for the use of FF, if the FF interests and their tame politicians and media had not lied and lied (as is still happening in the articles on this site) we would now have other forms of propulsion, but they conned the gullible, didn’t they.
You are ignoring the obvious that the vast majority of people actually need FF (as you term gasoline, diesel, jet fuel, essential to daily life) in this remark and the idea that some other form of propulsion (?) might exist if it wasn’t for those awful: FF interests and their tame politicians and media.
You should enlighten us regarding your “other form of propulsion” that could replace an ICE ?
I’ve read a number of your comments with other articles and I think you are just an objector without reason nor do you have a sense of what would be the real-world situation if your ideas (whatever the are) were to exist. And then, when someone like me challenges you, you “demand” scientific answers to which you will go to “great length” to denigrate using unconvincing, disrespectful language.
Do me and other readers a favour and don’t reply to this comment. I for one won’t read it.
Amazing, someone with a brain. Maybe rather than accusing me of “critically malign others” you could tell your fellow deniers to stop posting abuse and drivel and respond honestly to the facts I have posted. That is yet to happen,
“You are ignoring the obvious that the vast majority of people actually need FF ” Why do you lie? When have I said otherwise? You are the typical denier of fabricating a claim about what someone didn’t say and then running with it. Sorry, to and play that infantile game with your mates.
Ever heard of electric motors? Sails? Nuclear? Obviously not, so maybe I was incorrect saying you had a brain.
You ask me to respond and yet end with “Do me and other readers a favour and don’t reply to this comment. I for one won’t read it.”
In other words you and your denier buddies don’t want the facts. Which is why you are an ignorant denier.
Colin,you would have a little bit of credence if you had responded to my posts containing facts that disprove the claims made in these pages rather than just bleating.
Also, maybe you and your fellow deniers don’t like the contents of my factual posts but there are others passing through who will be interested, so your obvious attempt at silencing me is risible.
Who are those who silence facts and the truth?
“Being honest may not get you a lot of friends but it’ll always get you the right ones.” — John Lennon
“Those who will not reason, are bigots, those who cannot, are fools, and those who dare not, are slaves.” — George Gordon Byron
“Fools lie, clever men stick to the truth.” — Michael Scott
“Always remember… Rumors are carried by haters, spread by fools, and accepted by idiots.” — Ziad K. Abdelnour
“Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored.” — Alduous Huxley
Diddums, bless, does baby need a dummy to suck?
Some years ago whilst interacting with AGW deniers they lead me to the Flat Earth cult, which I had not encountered before. which ios very interesting.
I soon found that the Flat Earth cultists were remarkably similar in that they rejected conventional science, had a go to group of gurus who they believed unquestionably and rejected out of hand all facts, scientific papers,and sp on and on.
They also endlessly spout infantile drivel like “Biden,Gore and DiCaprio along with Greenpeace,NRDC,EDF Friends of t he Earth Etc the Biggest sources of Hot Air around”.
Biden,Gore and DiCaprio along with Greenpeace,NRDC,EDF Friends of t he Earth Etc the Biggest sources of Hot Air around