Environmentalists have claimed for decades that the decision to have a child is one of the most environmentally damaging choices a person can make.
The U.S. birthrate sunk to the lowest level ever recorded Thursday. Only 3.85 billion babies were born last year, about 60.2 births per every 1,000 women ages 15 to 44. Experts worry about the pressure the trend is placing on programs like social security and Medicare which rely on a robust foundation of young workers to cover the costs of elderly Americans, The Wall Street Journal reports.
“Across all cultures, raising a child is considered one of the most rewarding things a person can do,” environmental expert and author Bjorn Lomborg writes in Project Syndicate. “Yet a chorus of campaigners, scientists, and journalists suggest that everyone should think twice before procreating.”
Lomborg is a visiting professor at the Copenhagen Business School and serves as director of the Copenhagen Consensus Center, a Danish think tank that specializes in cost-benefit analyses of international issues and policy.
Lomborg traces the environmental call to restrict births to the 1970s. Fear of overpopulation incited panic and dire predictions of a global collapse through dwindling resources.
The National Organization for Non-Parents, formed in 1972 by U.S. activists, “promoted childfree living as both a socially respectable and politically responsible reproductive choice,” according to a 2016 academic paper on the group.
Scientists in the past decade have latched onto the rationale used in the ’70s, that a growing population of people will cause permanent damage to the climate and use up Earth’s natural resources.
“In discussions about climate change, we tend to focus on the carbon emissions of an individual over his or her lifetime,” Oregon State University Professor Paul Murtaugh told The New York Times in 2009. “Those are important issues and it’s essential that they should be considered. But an added challenge facing us is continuing population growth and increasing global consumption of resources.”
“I don’t have children, but it is a choice I am considering and discussing with my fiancé,” Kimberly Nicholas, a member of an environmental research team at Lund University in Sweden told The Guardian in July 2017. “Because we care so much about climate change that will certainly be one factor we consider in the decision, but it won’t be the only one.”
Climate change has yet to have a conclusive, measurable impact on the global economy. Its damages are expected to make up 2 percent of global GDP in the next 50 years and 3 to 4 percent in the next century, according to Lomborg.
“Climate change certainly is a challenge we must confront,” Lomborg writes. “But scaring people from having children denies potential parents what is often seen as one of the best things life has to offer … Doing little environmental good at such a huge human cost is a bad deal for everyone.”
Read more at Daily Caller
You know your a liberal Eco-Wacko when you have a bumper sticker reading SAVE THE REDWOODS and window sticker KEEP ABORTION LEGAL and your a member of Greenpeace and Planned Parenthood
David Suzuki is a babbling nincompoop and a total idiot just like the rest of the Global Warming crowd
400 straight months of warmer than average temperatures.
A statistic that can only be understood by man-made global warming.
Drewski
You are a LIAR.
“Experts.” So, so Worried. Worried about overpopulating the planet, worried about climate change, worried about guns, genetically modified foods, worried about polar bears and snail darters and borders and tree frogs, worried about deforestation, gender self-identification, worried about melting ice, drought, protecting planned parenthood, coal, bugs, reefs and climate change deniers.
Stop worrying. YOUR new world order is just a generation or two away. “Globally, Muslims have the highest fertility rate, an average of 3.1 children per woman—well above replacement level (2.1).” “By 2030, Muslims will make up more than a quarter of the global population.” Come 2050, children will just have female genital mutilation to worry about.
Lies lies lies and consequences.
David Suzuki apparently didn’t get the memo . Maggot man has been a busy little bunny .
Have all enviromentalists report to the disintigration booths so they dont have to worry about producing anymore kids which offends Gaia their pagan deity they worship during their Earth Day Celebrations
3.85 billion births?
Billion versus million, who cares? Not the ink -stained wretches who don’t believe in proof readers.
Simple. Let’s do a Hitler and neuter all women. All humans will die off and then the fauna on earth can deal with NATURAL GLOBAL WARMING.