• Privacy Policy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
Climate Change Dispatch
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
Climate Change Dispatch
No Result
View All Result

A Big Easy Windfall: Trial Lawyers Blame Louisiana’s Oil Industry For Coastal Erosion

by PAUL DRIESSEN
October 24, 2017, 8:15 AM
in Energy, Lawfare, Money & Finance, News and Opinion, Politics
Reading Time: 3 mins read
A A
2

Trial lawyers have carved out a cottage industry suing Louisiana’s oil and natural gas companies. Now they are teaming up for a huge jackpot, multibillion-dollar awards based on blaming the energy industry for Louisiana’s coastal land erosion.

The charge ignores history, practices unrelated to the oil industry, and basic reality.

The opportunistic and predatory trial lawyers would have the people of Louisiana and America believe that the energy industry alone is responsible for decades-long coastal erosion.

In concocting this narrative, they leave out vitally important facts: studies demonstrating the impact of natural erosion from ocean currents in the Gulf of Mexico; hurricane and other storm impacts; human actions such as the Army Corps of Engineers building levees along the Mississippi River; and soil conservation practices through the Midwest and beyond, which have greatly reduced silt entering the river and reaching the delta.

The prospect of a multimillion-dollar prize gives the lawyers a powerful incentive to pursue “jackpot justice.”

However, they have produced no credible evidence correlating coastal land loss with drilling projects that go back as far as the 1930s. No signs indicate any present-day energy industry impacts on coastal erosion.

Even more outrageous, these energy projects were sanctioned, permitted, and encouraged by Louisiana and its regulatory agencies. The energy producers abided by state laws and regulations.

In more recent decades, federal regulators also got involved in reviewing and issuing permits.

Nevertheless, the lawyers are trotting out river barge loads of junk science in pursuit of billion-dollar judgments. Even if successful, money remaining after the trial lawyers’ princely cut would likely evaporate within the state’s general fund, leaving little for actual solutions to coastal erosion.

The oil and gas industry has been the backbone of Louisiana’s economy for decades, with many families, friends, and neighbors working to build the industry. The industry has generated billions in employee earnings in Louisiana and along the Gulf Coast.

Each year, oil and natural gas companies in Louisiana pay nearly $3 billion in taxes, roughly 30% of all taxes collected by the state. The companies pay more than $1.3 billion annually to the state’s parishes and cities. In the decade between 2006 and 2016, the industry paid $14 billion just for the opportunity to do business in the Pelican State.

They’ve also paid countless billions in federal lease bonuses, rents, royalties, taxes, and salaries related to drilling and production further offshore, by workers, facilities, and transportation operations located in Louisiana and moving through the delta region.

Sadly for Louisiana and other U.S. citizens, the trial lawyers have stacked the deck. They provided overwhelming support to fellow trial lawyer John Bel Edwards in his successful bid for governor and have worked to ensure that their hand-picked Louisiana Supreme Court nominees were put on the bench.

In 2016, Governor Edwards hosted representatives from several energy companies in a meeting and, reading from a script seemingly prepared by the jackpot lawyers, issued a directive that they begin settlement negotiations the following week, to avoid further litigation.

When asked about other contributors to Louisiana’s land loss problem, the governor responded that he is not interested in immune or insolvent defendants.

It’s certainly hard to argue that state Supreme Court Justices James Hughes and Jefferson Genovese don’t favor trial lawyers when the lawyers accounted for nearly half the justices’ campaign expenditures.

It’s easy to see why the trial lawyers hope to keep these cases in Louisiana courts, where they exert a powerful influence, and away from federal courts that have strict rules against “junk science” and where the issues would be adjudicated properly and fairly.

The U.S. Chamber of Commerce’s Lawsuit Climate Survey evaluates how fair and reasonable state tort liability systems are. The 2017 survey found that, in nearly every category, Louisiana was at the very bottom.

The survey also found that 85% of senior attorneys at major American companies say a state’s litigation climate is likely to impact important business decisions at their companies, such as where to locate or do business.

Louisiana remains at the forefront of safe exploration and production of oil and natural gas. The industry has a long-standing history of cooperation with public officials, community leaders, and natural resource and environmental experts. It remains the top private investor in Louisiana’s Gulf Coast.

Decades of state and national investment, infrastructure, jobs, community involvement, and revenue generation could be destroyed by a greedy cadre of trial lawyers who think they’ve found the perfect “get rich quick” scheme. Only by sending these cases to federal courts can any fair resolution be found.

Driessen is a senior policy analyst for the Committee for a Constructive Tomorrow and author of articles and books on public policy.

Read more at Investor’s Business Daily [Archive]

  • Truth
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Gettr
  • Threads
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Mastodon
  • Buffer
  • Telegram
  • Email
  • Copy Link
  • Share Using More Networks…
Share via
  • Facebook
  • Like
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Digg
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Skype
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky

Join our list

Subscribe to our mailing list and get interesting stuff and updates to your email inbox.

Thank you for subscribing.

Something went wrong.

We respect your privacy and take protecting it seriously

Related Posts

Energy

British Energy Boss Says Net-Zero Grid Won’t Lower UK Electric Bills

May 14, 2025
Agriculture

AfricaNews Blames Climate Change for Nigeria’s Drought, Ignores Real Factors

May 13, 2025
Energy

Energy Department Axes 47 Rules Targeting Appliances, Buildings, and DEI

May 13, 2025

Comments 2

  1. David Lewis says:
    8 years ago

    It is easy to prove that the oil industry has not caused coastal erosion. They need to be aggressive enough to do so.

    I keep stating that a sure way to shut down these suits is to counter sue. This has been very effective in my person life. These companies need to get aggressive in order to effectively deal with predatory lawyers.

  2. Spurwing Plover says:
    8 years ago

    And the law firms of Vulture,Snake,Slug,Hyenah,Worm and Buzzard bring lawsuits agaonst a oil firm it gose bankrupt and Hunderds of workers lose their jobs these miserble creatures need banished from america

Stay Connected On Social Media

gab-logo

Donate Today

Beating back the alarmist narrative takes time and money. Please donate today to help!

Recent Posts

  • north sea wind farmBritish Energy Boss Says Net-Zero Grid Won’t Lower UK Electric Bills
    May 14, 2025
    British Gas CEO says a net-zero grid won't cut UK electricity prices, contradicting Labour’s savings claim and sparking fresh energy policy debate. […]
  • corn field sunAfricaNews Blames Climate Change for Nigeria’s Drought, Ignores Real Factors
    May 13, 2025
    AfricaNews blames climate change for Nigeria’s drought, but poor water management, deforestation, and overuse are the real, overlooked culprits. […]
  • Chris Wright Fox NewsEnergy Department Axes 47 Rules Targeting Appliances, Buildings, and DEI
    May 13, 2025
    Trump’s Energy Department scrapped 47 rules targeting appliances, buildings, DEI, and energy that gut Green New Deal mandates and lower prices. […]
  • protest climate system changeDivided High Court Ruling Lets Boulder’s Climate Lawsuit ‘Limp Forward’
    May 13, 2025
    A narrow Colorado Supreme Court ruling allows Boulder’s climate lawsuit to stagger forward, even as similar cases nationwide get tossed. […]
  • cars stopped‘Everyone Hates It’: EPA Chief Moves To Scrap Start-Stop Tech In New Cars
    May 13, 2025
    EPA head Lee Zeldin moves to kill start-stop tech in new cars, calling it a hated gimmick that offers little real benefit. […]
  • offshore wind farmHow Biden’s ‘Clean Energy’ Blitz Turned Into A Rushed, Regulatory Trainwreck
    May 12, 2025
    Biden’s offshore wind frenzy sparked backlash over rushed approvals, tribal objections, and turbine failures as his term neared its end. […]
  • power grid lines solarExpanding France’s Power Grid With More Wind And Solar Poses ‘Serious Risk’
    May 12, 2025
    France’s power grid is straining as nuclear collides with unstable wind and solar—Spain’s recent blackout shows what’s at stake. […]
  • man money wind solarChris Wright Poised To Slash Biden’s Last-Minute Green Energy Loan Blitz
    May 12, 2025
    DOE chief Chris Wright announced plans to cancel risky Biden-era energy loans that don’t benefit Americans or rely too heavily on taxpayer money. […]
  • solar panels snowTexas Bill Requires Solar Farms To Have Fossil Fuel Backup Power
    May 12, 2025
    A Texas bill would force solar plants to buy backup power for night use, sparking debate over costs, blackouts, and the future of renewables. […]
  • newsom presser gas pricesNewsom’s War On Oil Could Send California Gas Prices To $9, Analyst Warns
    May 9, 2025
    Refinery closures and Newsom’s hostility to energy companies could push California gas prices from $6 to $9 a gallon, analyst warns. […]

Get Instant Email Notifications

Enter your email address to receive notifications of new posts by email either instantly or daily. Check your Junk folder for any verification emails upon subscribing.

Submit a tip

Please enter your email, so we know you're human.

Books We Like

very convenient warming

exposing great lie

Have a suggestion? Let us know! We swap out books based on your input. We participate in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. See here.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us

© Portions copyright Climate Change Dispatch

Share via
  • Threads
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Mastodon
  • Buffer
  • Telegram
  • Email
  • Copy Link
  • Share Using More Networks…
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us

© 2025 Climate Change Dispatch