The usual fake news sources are hysterically parroting the standard NOAA and NASA fake news about 2017 being the hottest something or other.
As with every other month, the bright red NOAA map is fake. It shows red almost everywhere!
The actual NOAA thermometer map (below) shows 50% of the land surface as missing data, 14% of the land as below normal temperature, and just over one-third of the land surface as above normal.
NOAA simply makes data up to create the appearance of a red-hot burning planet.
NOAA turns very cold regions to warm, and areas of no data to record hot. The magic of data tampering and fake data.
Thanks to Climategate E-mails, we know that the ocean data is also fake.
NOAA and NASA got their red crayons out and colored red everywhere for their useful idiots in the press. But it has nothing to do with climate or science.
Read more at Real Climate Science
NOAA must have taken lessons from the top dogs in the FBI on whipping up and using fake dossiers to get their way . Kind of like an insurance policy . Maybe the Russians changed NOAA numbers .
Like global warming they apparent are responsible for everything bad .
So Hillary and the DNC pay a retired spy who pays Russians for a National Enquirer quality fake dossier that we are to believe caused Hillary to lose the election . Not sure this qualifies to beat out the global warming con-game but it hands together about the same .
If we are to believe the Russian distraction story Hillary deserves to lose just on the basis her and her DNC pals paid millions to Russians that somehow cost her the her election . Now if the Russians felt they owned the DNC and Hillary because of the $148 million the Clinton Foundation got and bills $500,000 “speaking fee ” that may be a different story .
NOAA is NOAA longer believed . Manipulating data not a good idea .
NOAA needs some new faces perferably someone who is not a hard green and belongs to Greenpeace,Sierra Club,NRDC and EDF like it was under Clinton and Obama