• Privacy Policy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
Climate Change Dispatch
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
Climate Change Dispatch
No Result
View All Result

140,000 Think Planting Trees Will Offset Trump’s Withdrawal From The Paris Climate Accord

by Tim Pearce
August 15, 2017, 3:54 PM
in News and Opinion
Reading Time: 2 mins read
A A
10

Three climate scientists have started an initiative to plant more than 100 billion new trees to mitigate the environmental impact of President Donald Trump pulling the U.S. out of the Paris agreement on climate change, the BBC reports.

Current pledges to plant trees number about 140,000 from a little over 500 people, 0.0000014 percent of the #TrumpForest project’s ambitious goal, according to project’s website.

Project creators Dan Price of Britain, Jeff Willis of the U.S., and Adrien Taylor of New Zealand are encouraging twitter users to tag actor and environmental activist Leonardo DiCaprio in tweets to draw his attention to the project.

“We’ve met some of the people on the front lines of climate change in Bangladesh, Mongolia and in other countries, and we found it extremely upsetting that Mr. Trump’s ignorance is so profound,” Taylor told the BBC. “So we started to do something about it. Only a small percentage of the world voted him in, but we all have to deal with the consequences of his climate ignorance.”

The project began in March 2017 with the goal of planting enough trees that “the backward steps of the Trump Administration will be negated until a sane, logical government, that bases its decisions on scientific advice wins the next election,” the website says.

Trump pulled out of the Paris climate accord in June saying the withdrawal is “in America’s economic interest and won’t matter much to the climate.”

“This agreement is less about the climate and more about other countries gaining a financial advantage over the United States,” Trump told reporters.

A recent study found the chance of preventing temperatures from warming more than 2 degrees Celsius is just 5 percent under Paris climate regulations.

“Current [Paris Climate Accord] pledges need to be ratcheted up significantly to curb emissions quickly enough to remain below 2°C,” the Trump Forest website states.

After fielding criticism for naming the forest after Trump and feeding the president’s narcissism, the three climate scientists defended the name saying they want him to “love the forest,” according to the BBC.

Read more at Daily Caller

  • Truth
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Gettr
  • Threads
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Mastodon
  • Buffer
  • Telegram
  • Email
  • Copy Link
  • Share Using More Networks…

Popular Posts

Electric Vehicles (EVs)

The ‘Green’ Scam Of The Century: How ‘Renewables’ Increase Fossil Fuel Demands

Oct 23, 2024
News and Opinion

Antarctica Is Colder, Icier Today Than At Any Time In 5,000 Years

Apr 15, 2024
Energy

30-Plus Signs That The Climate Scam Is Collapsing

Apr 09, 2025

Comments 10

  1. Spurwing Plover says:
    8 years ago

    I would like to see Leonardo DiCaprio,Robert Kennedy Jr,Al Gore,Luarie David and the rest of the Hollywood enviromentalists wackos soil their lilly white hands and plan some trees without the paparazi vultures hanging around

  2. Sonnyhill says:
    8 years ago

    Thanks to the Liberals’ expensive energy policy, firewood is making a comeback in Ontario.
    If you really want to make the world a better place plant environmentalists, not trees. Six feet deep works best.

  3. dragon ball super says:
    8 years ago

    planting trees is always a good idea

  4. Shoki Kaneda says:
    8 years ago

    Why don’t they ever criticize the Brazilians who tolerate raping the Amazon basin?

  5. old44 says:
    8 years ago

    Good one Sonnyhill, but what about your socialist mate Bob Hawke and his election promise to plant one billion trees, what a load of crap that turned out to be.

  6. Spurwing Plover says:
    8 years ago

    These Eco-Wacko idiots will try anything to stop something(Global Warming)that’s not happening if their not going vegan or riding bikes or taking part in that dumb Earth Hour poppycock now they want to plant trees to offset the CO2 which these idiots think is a Polutant and frankly the worst form of polution is the mind polution from the radical enviromental groups(Greenpeace,NRDC,EDF,Sierra Club,Earth Justice Etc)and the usial hollywood wackos(DiCaprio,Laurie David,Al Gore Etc)and the TV trash like Captian Planet or some liberal Earthday Special

  7. Sonnyhill says:
    8 years ago

    Planting a tree to save the planet is like believing baptism will save your soul.
    Honestly, trees plant themselves. They are the ultimate weed, grabbing sunlight (by virtue of their height) and water (deep roots) from lesser plants. Hardly the heroes to socialists.
    Let the Warmists put their money where their mouth is, buy land and retire it. The trees will happen. No taxpayer subsidies allowed.

  8. JayPee says:
    8 years ago

    Why is the idiocy of the
    ” co2-greenhouse-global warming ” conjecture
    accepted as gospel indisputable fact
    when there never has been an iota of proof
    to substantiate it ?

    This alarmism is in no way science,
    it is fanatical religious fervor because of a desire to believe
    that which does not exist.

  9. David Lewis says:
    8 years ago

    I wonder how many years without warming it will take before people like the authors realize that man made climate change is a fraud. I but some will still believe in the cause if we enter a mini ice age.

    Most of the time planting trees is a good idea. With the extreme cost of the Paris Treaty, why wasn’t planting trees the first solution? Could it be all of the hidden agendas supported by forcing a reduction in fossil fuel use?

    • John says:
      8 years ago

      I agree with you.
      Planting trees makes way more sense than planting windmills.
      Man made climate change is exactly that: man made. Fraudulent lies.

Stay Connected On Social Media

gab-logo

Donate Today

Beating back the alarmist narrative takes time and money. Please donate today to help!

Recent Posts

  • earthGlobal Mean Temperature Might Be a Mathematical Illusion, New Research Suggests
    Dec 15, 2025
    New research questions whether global mean temperatures are real or just a mathematical construct, challenging standard climate science methods. […]
  • Trump and EU head Ursula Von Der Leyen in ScotlandEU Retreats From Complete Combustion Engine Ban, Parliamentarian Claims
    Dec 15, 2025
    EU softens its stance on internal combustion engines, replacing a full ban with emissions targets, an EU lawmaker claims. […]
  • mann hockey stick cbsOregon Court Slams Attorney Over Undisclosed Role In Mann-Backed Climate Doom Study
    Dec 15, 2025
    An Oregon court criticized Multnomah County attorney for undisclosed involvement in Mann-backed climate study used in $51B lawsuit. […]
  • pbs headlineCountdown To Catastrophe: PBS Promotes Another False UN Climate Report
    Dec 15, 2025
    PBS uncritically promotes UN climate report that a meteorologist calls false, baseless, and disconnected from real-world data. […]
  • green new dealWhy Climate Change Took A Back Seat To The Cost Of Living
    Dec 15, 2025
    As inflation and energy costs surged, climate politics faded from the spotlight, with affordability overtaking alarm as voters’ top priority. […]
  • xi jinping eco conferenceChina’s ‘Climate Hero’ Image Crumbles—Coal Still Powers Most Electricity
    Dec 12, 2025
    China’s renewable hype fades as coal still fuels the majority of its electricity, exposing the gap between perception and reality. […]
  • zuckerberg yacht launchpadClimate Concerns? Zuckerberg’s Diesel-Chugging, Carbon-Spewing Megayacht Says Otherwise
    Dec 12, 2025
    Zuckerberg talks climate doom, but his diesel-chugging megayacht burns more fuel than hundreds of households — and sinks his credibility. […]
  • outdoor air conditioner unitChill Out: Refrigerants Pose No Global Warming Threat
    Dec 12, 2025
    Biden EPA refrigerant rule raises AC costs and safety risks while cutting global temperatures by an amount too small to measure. […]
  • storm aftermathInsurance Companies Are Making Record Profits Off Climate Change Panic, Not Facts
    Dec 12, 2025
    Insurers posted record profits as climate-risk mandates and flawed models pushed premiums higher, contradicting the panic about extreme weather losses. […]
  • Moving truckZillow Drops ‘Climate Risk Scores’ From Property Listings And The Media Loses It
    Dec 11, 2025
    Zillow ditches faulty climate-risk scores that were dragging down home values and based on unscientific attribution models, sparking a media meltdown. […]

Get Instant Email Notifications

Subscribe to receive a digest of daily stories, or get emailed once they're published. Check your Junk/Spam folder for a verification email.

Submit a tip

Please enter your email, so we know you're human.

Books You May Like

exposing great lie

Have a suggestion? Let us know! We swap out books based on your input. We participate in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. See here.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us

© Portions copyright Climate Change Dispatch

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us

© 2025 Climate Change Dispatch

 
Share via
  • Facebook
  • Like
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Digg
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky
Share via
  • Digg
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky