• Privacy Policy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
Climate Change Dispatch
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
Climate Change Dispatch
No Result
View All Result

Pen Hadow’s Arctic Mission Gives Up—Blocked By Sea Ice!

by Paul Homewood
September 01, 2017, 10:30 AM
in News and Opinion
Reading Time: 6 mins read
A A
9
Share on FacebookShare on XwitterShare on Linkedin

CCD Editor’s Note: See 9/1/17 update* at the end with more information.

image

http://www.arcticmission.com/arctic-mission-reaches-furthest-north/

Pen Hadow’s attempt to sail to the North Pole has been rather embarrassingly brought to an abrupt halt by sea ice!

The furthest North they got was 80 degrees 10 minutes, and after being moored to an ice floe for a day, the decision was made to turn tail and head south.

image

http://www.arcticmission.com/follow-arctic-mission/

The Arctic Mission website tries to put the best spin on it:

Arctic Mission’s furthest North was 80 degrees 10 minutes North, 148 degrees 51 minutes West, reached at 22:04:12 (Alaskan Time, GMT-9hours) on 29 August 2017 by yachts, Bagheera and Snow Dragon II.

Arctic Mission moored its yachts to an ice floe on 29 August to conduct one of its 24-hour marine science surveys, while drifting with the sea ice. The strategy for any future northward progress had been to monitor the sea surface currents, sea ice, and weather conditions (both observed from the yachts and through satellites imagery downloaded onto our computers), and decide how to proceed as we approached the end of the 24-hour survey.

A meeting of the four skippers was held led by Erik de Jong, with Pen Hadow present, and it was agreed further northward progress would increase considerably the risks to the expedition, with very limited scientific reward. The decision to head south, back to an area of less concentrated sea ice in the vicinity of 79 degrees 30 minutes North, was made at 18.30 (Alaskan time).

Arctic Mission has demonstrated that commercial fishing and shipping vessels can now access and exploit a new, unexplored and vulnerable ocean region on the planet, the Central Arctic Ocean, due to the melting of its sea-ice cover. Approximately 1 million square kilometres of the Central Arctic Ocean is likely to have been ice-free this summer, having had year-round ice cover throughout human history until the 1980s, and likely has had for many tens of thousands of years.

The commercial activities made possible by this loss of summer sea ice puts at risk the extraordinary wildlife that has evolved to survive in this extreme environment. Polar bears, whales, seals, fishes, seabirds, invertebrates and microbes all contribute to a unique and special ecosystem which is unlike any other on earth.

Arctic Mission has undertaken an extensive oceanographic, wildlife and ecosystem research programme during the voyage, led by Tim Gordon of the University of Exeter (UK). This has included work on acoustic ecology, copepod distributions and physiology, microplastic pollution surveying, inorganic carbon chemistry, seabird range expansion and microbial DNA sequencing. Scientific findings will be released following comprehensive data analysis and formal publication in peer-reviewed journals in 2018/19.

It is believed Arctic Mission has sailed further north from the coastlines surrounding the Arctic Ocean than any vessel in history without icebreaker support.

Its vessels were the first to reach the international waters surrounding the North Pole (aka the Central Arctic Ocean), without icebreaker support and without freezing in.

Its vessels have set the first furthest north within the Central Arctic Ocean without icebreaker support.

Arctic Mission’s northernmost position was 590 nautical miles (678.5 statute miles) from the North Pole.”

http://www.arcticmission.com/arctic-mission-reaches-furthest-north/

Much of what they claim is sheer drivel. There is absolutely no evidence that this part of the ocean has not been ice free many times in recent human history. We do know that the Arctic was been much warmer in the Middle Ages, for instance.

They also claim that they have sailed further north without ice breaker support than anybody else. But I am not aware of anyone who has actually tried to. And certainly not in boats specially built to sail in waters with sea ice.

Despite repeated claims of ice free seas, the writing has been on the wall for the expedition for several days, during which they have been meandering around the same area of ocean, presumably trying to find a way through the ice.

image

2-Hourly Plots from 26th August

They are now retreating to 79 degrees 30 minutes North, and it is possible they may make another attempt if the ice miraculously disappears. However, there is no sign of this, and NORSEX even shows the sea ice extent increasing in recent days, and well above last year’s levels.

image

http://web.nersc.no/WebData/arctic-roos.org/observation/ssmi_ice_ext.png

The ice to the north of them is very thick:

http://ocean.dmi.dk/arctic/icethickness/thk.uk.php

And Arctic temperatures are well below zero:

temp_latest.big

http://ocean.dmi.dk/arctic/weather/arcticweather_imagecontainer.php

https://i0.wp.com/ocean.dmi.dk/arctic/plots/meanTarchive/meanT_2017.png

http://ocean.dmi.dk/arctic/meant80n.uk.php

Hadow will doubtlessly return home to be feted by the BBC, where he will claim that the objective was never to reach the North Pole, but only to do scientific research.

But let’s not forget what the headlines on their own website say:

image

http://www.arcticmission.com/

Just one more abysmal failure, which will join the list of all the other failed attempts to walk, row and sail to the North Pole.

Read more at Not a lot of People Know That

*CCD UPDATE: Breitbart’s James Delingpole details previous ‘Ship of Fools’ Arctic failures as well as this one:

This is not the first time Hadow has been denied the “bittersweet achievement” of pinning Arctic melt on “climate change.” In 2009 – with encouragement from the Prince of Wales – Hadow led the Catlin Arctic Survey expedition which had to be cancelled less than half way into its 800-mile trek because the equipment broke in the freezing temperatures.

His latest failure comes a year after yet another sailing expedition – this one called The Polar Ocean Challenge, led by veteran explorer David Hempleman-Adams – was also frustrated by unexpectedly large quantities of ice.

That was Ship of Fools II.

Ship of Fools I was, of course, the glorious December 2013 expedition to Antarctica – led by an Australian alarmist called Chris Turney, one of the correspondents in the Climategate scandal  – which had to be called off after becoming stuck in ice which Turney insisted could not have been predicted.

Then earlier this summer, we learned of Ship of Fools III – a Canadian research expedition which had to be cancelled because, you guessed it, of “unprecedented” summer sea ice.

Why are these hapless fools such suckers for punishment?

Short answer: because that’s where the money is.

  • Truth
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Gettr
  • Threads
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Mastodon
  • Buffer
  • Telegram
  • Email
  • Copy Link
  • Share Using More Networks…
Share via
  • Facebook
  • Like
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Digg
  • Tumblr
  • VKontakte
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Buffer
  • Love This
  • Weibo
  • Pocket
  • Xing
  • Odnoklassniki
  • WhatsApp
  • Meneame
  • Blogger
  • Amazon
  • Yahoo Mail
  • Gmail
  • AOL
  • Newsvine
  • HackerNews
  • Evernote
  • MySpace
  • Mail.ru
  • Viadeo
  • Line
  • Flipboard
  • Comments
  • SMS
  • Viber
  • Telegram
  • Subscribe
  • Facebook Messenger
  • Kakao
  • LiveJournal
  • Yammer
  • Edgar
  • Fintel
  • Mix
  • Instapaper
  • Copy Link
  • Truth
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Gettr
  • Baidu
  • Mastodon
  • Threads
  • Bluesky

Join our list

Subscribe to our mailing list and get interesting stuff and updates to your email inbox.

Thank you for subscribing.

Something went wrong.

We respect your privacy and take protecting it seriously

Related Posts

Energy

Democrats’ Massive Climate Agenda Loses Support With Most Americans

Jun 13, 2025
Electric Vehicles (EVs)

Four GOP Senators Call For Fewer Cuts To Biden’s Green New Scam

Jun 13, 2025
Electric Vehicles (EVs)

11 States Led By California AG Sue Trump To Save California’s EV Mandate

Jun 13, 2025

Comments 9

  1. Me says:
    8 years ago

    These morons never never fail to fail! Amazing isn’t it!

  2. Spurwing Plover says:
    8 years ago

    Lets them get stranded in the arctic so the Arctic Terns,Skuas and Polar-bears can use the amusment

  3. Gerry says:
    8 years ago

    “Arctic Mission’s northernmost position was 590 nautical miles (678.5 statute miles) from the North Pole.”??? Somebody screwed up. That’s a lot of fecking ice!!! I’m thinking they should get satellite data from a more reliable source next time. Or check with all those commercial vessels polluting the place to see what the ice extent from the NP really is.

    They are going to do this again…right???

  4. Steelman says:
    8 years ago

    Sad thing is that the purpose is served. Average people don’t care that much, they go with the rest of the sheep. By just announcing they are going to sail to the NP, the average newsreader, thinks that the ice extent must be real low and eat the cookie, served by MSM.
    Off cause, they don’t announce their retreat in the same, bold manner. And that’s how the cookie crumbles. Hyping, hyping and hyping.

  5. Spurwing Plover says:
    8 years ago

    hat ever became of the nit-wit who was going to sail about on the Iceberg to call attention to the Global Warming its kind of reminds me of that sillly and dumb art piece Spaceship Earth which called out the so called Fragile Earth and the dumb thing fell apart disapointing the fool who designed it

  6. G says:
    8 years ago

    Their website says they are taking their yachts to the North Pole “to conduct vital scientific research”. Hmmmm… if this research is so vital why the hell would anyone take a sailing yacht to get there?

    Until they can show a more plausible purpose, let’s go with the obvious… This is just another Hollywood-style attempt to grab political headlines in the name of science.

    #Ship of Fools

  7. Amber says:
    8 years ago

    And now the polar bears are dying of laughter . Ships stuck in ice . Geez
    humans are slow learners . You would think after Franklin’s demise the only ships to take on the north are massive ice breakers . But oh no every year
    some goofs who have been drinking spiked global warming cool-aid have to see if they can dodge ice bergs .
    This is one story that won’t make an Al Gore earth has a fever movie .
    It’s absolutely amazing after being chronically wrong for decades Al Gore can even leave his mansion without being laughed off the street .

  8. Spurwing Plover says:
    8 years ago

    One of the biggist fruads and misconceptions of today is cartoons and comicstrips that show Penguins and Polarbears living in the same enviroment becuase Penguins live in the south pole polarbears in the North Pole and Arctic Terns know this

  9. Spurwing Plover says:
    8 years ago

    This just gets better with the Climate Change/Global Warming nutcases and trying to prove their crack-pot theory just like with Evolution their having their Piltdown Man/Archoraptor moments when their speiemens turn out to be total fakes

Stay Connected On Social Media

gab-logo

Donate Today

Beating back the alarmist narrative takes time and money. Please donate today to help!

Recent Posts

  • it's ot easy being greenDemocrats’ Massive Climate Agenda Loses Support With Most Americans
    Jun 13, 2025
    Democrats face growing backlash as many Americans reject Biden’s costly climate agenda and Trump rolls back key policies. […]
  • solar panel workerFour GOP Senators Call For Fewer Cuts To Biden’s Green New Scam
    Jun 13, 2025
    Four GOP senators break ranks, warn against full repeal of green energy subsidies in Biden’s Inflation Reduction Act. […]
  • Driving electric will now be a consumer choice.11 States Led By California AG Sue Trump To Save California’s EV Mandate
    Jun 13, 2025
    California and 10 other states sued Trump over 3 Congressional resolutions blocking the Golden State’s de facto ban on new gas-powered cars. […]
  • Ice Harbor Dam snake riverTrump Revokes Biden’s Snake River Dam Order, Citing Energy And Salmon Recovery
    Jun 13, 2025
    Trump revokes Biden’s executive action on Snake River dams, drawing praise from salmon supporters and criticism from environmentalists. […]
  • President Trump signs resolutions against California's electric vehicle mandates.It’s Official! Trump Nixes California’s Electric Vehicle Mandate
    Jun 12, 2025
    Trump ends Biden’s electric vehicle mandate, restoring consumer choice and rolling back California’s influence on national transportation policy. […]
  • cnn photo essayCNN Blames Climate Change For Man-Made Disasters In Deceptive Photo Essay
    Jun 12, 2025
    CNN uses emotional photos to push a climate narrative, but the real causes are poor policy, bad planning, and human neglect—not climate. […]
  • Ivanpah Solar FarmCalifornia’s Ivanpah Solar Plant Shutting Down Over High Costs, Low Output
    Jun 12, 2025
    California’s $2.2B solar gamble flops as Ivanpah shuts down early, while the Diablo Canyon nuclear plant quietly powers on. […]
  • Sierra Club protestSierra Club, Major Green Groups Cut Jobs As Trump Scraps Climate Programs
    Jun 12, 2025
    Sierra Club and other green groups have cut jobs as Trump kills green energy policies amid a shifting climate activism landscape. […]
  • Lee ZeldinTrump EPA Overturns Biden-Era Rules That Would Close Coal, Gas Plants
    Jun 12, 2025
    Trump’s EPA scraps Biden-era rules targeting coal and gas plants, citing energy costs, grid risks, and regulatory overreach. […]
  • NASA MSU satelliteClimatologist Details How NASA GISS And Climate.gov Drain Taxpayer Dollars
    Jun 11, 2025
    Taxpayer-funded agencies like NASA GISS and NOAA are pushing climate fear to secure funding, blurring the line between science and advocacy. […]

Get Instant Email Notifications

Enter your email address to receive notifications of new posts by email either instantly or daily. Check your Junk folder for any verification emails upon subscribing.

Submit a tip

Please enter your email, so we know you're human.

Books We Like

very convenient warming

exposing great lie

Have a suggestion? Let us know! We swap out books based on your input. We participate in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. See here.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us

© Portions copyright Climate Change Dispatch

Share via
  • Threads
  • gab-logo Gab
  • Mastodon
  • Buffer
  • Telegram
  • Email
  • Copy Link
  • Share Using More Networks…
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Who We Are
  • Facts Vs. Fearmongering
    • Real science vs Junk Science
      • 1100-plus Peer-Reviewed Studies
      • 97% – Myth of the Climate Change Consensus
      • Michael Crichton: Aliens Cause Global Warming
      • Climate change and its causes
      • Climate Science Primer
      • CO2 is not pollution
      • Deceptive Surface Temperature Records
      • Editorial: Great Global Warming Hoax
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 1
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 2
      • Rules for Climate Radicals: Part 3
      • Why CO2 Is A Minor Player In Global Climate
      • Why Politicized Science Is So Dangerous
    • Facts Not Fear
      • A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
      • Climate Change – The Facts
      • Climate Change Fears Are Empirically Baseless
      • Global Warming 101
      • Global Warming Q&A
      • Understanding The Medieval Warm Period
      • Ocean Cycles and Climate
      • Overview of Plate Climatology Theory
      • Precautionary Principle
      • Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
      • The Skeptics Handbook
      • Weather Versus Climate
      • Why I’m a GW skeptic
      • Winning the climate debate with facts
      • Why Aliens Cause Global Warming
    • Greenhouse FAQs
      • CO2, Plants, & Industry
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • How much have temps changed?
      • Is global warming real?
      • Measuring temperature
      • Swimming in CO2?
      • Scientists urge caution?
      • Today’s warming trend
      • Variations in temperature
    • Gore’s Greatest Goofs
      • Deconstructing the Truth
      • Fact-Checking Al Gore’s Latest Predictions
      • How Gore Created The Global Warming Hoax
    • Inside Real Climate
      • Closer look at the 97% Consensus
      • GW’s Amazing Story
      • IPCC gets failing grade
      • Real Climate Exposed!
      • Truth about Real Climate
      • We’ve Been Conned
      • What is there a 97% consensus about?
    • Behind the IPCC
      • 1,000 Scientists Dissent
      • Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!
      • Climategate Inquiries
      • Climategate Inquiries 2
      • NIPCC Report Now Available
      • Understanding the Climategate Inquiries
  • Submissions
  • Contact Us

© 2025 Climate Change Dispatch