<?xml version="1.0"?>
<oembed><version>1.0</version><provider_name>Climate Change Dispatch</provider_name><provider_url>https://climatechangedispatch.com</provider_url><author_name>Thomas Richard</author_name><author_url>https://climatechangedispatch.com/author/ccdeditor/</author_url><title>Climate Scientists Question Signficance of Obama's New Carbon Rule</title><type>rich</type><width>600</width><height>338</height><html>&lt;blockquote class="wp-embedded-content" data-secret="D46oAZNZsw"&gt;&lt;a href="https://climatechangedispatch.com/climate-scientists-question-signficance-of-obama-s-new-carbon-rule/"&gt;Climate Scientists Question Signficance of Obama&#x2019;s New Carbon Rule&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;iframe sandbox="allow-scripts" security="restricted" src="https://climatechangedispatch.com/climate-scientists-question-signficance-of-obama-s-new-carbon-rule/embed/#?secret=D46oAZNZsw" width="600" height="338" title="&#x201C;Climate Scientists Question Signficance of Obama&#x2019;s New Carbon Rule&#x201D; &#x2014; Climate Change Dispatch" data-secret="D46oAZNZsw" frameborder="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" scrolling="no" class="wp-embedded-content"&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;&lt;script type="text/javascript"&gt;
/* &lt;![CDATA[ */
/*! This file is auto-generated */
!function(d,l){"use strict";l.querySelector&amp;&amp;d.addEventListener&amp;&amp;"undefined"!=typeof URL&amp;&amp;(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&amp;&amp;!/[^a-zA-Z0-9]/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),c=new RegExp("^https?:$","i"),i=0;i&lt;o.length;i++)o[i].style.display="none";for(i=0;i&lt;a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&amp;&amp;(s.removeAttribute("style"),"height"===t.message?(1e3&lt;(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r&lt;200&amp;&amp;(r=200),s.height=r):"link"===t.message&amp;&amp;(r=new URL(s.getAttribute("src")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&amp;&amp;n.host===r.host&amp;&amp;l.activeElement===s&amp;&amp;(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener("message",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll("iframe.wp-embedded-content"),r=0;r&lt;s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute("data-secret"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+="#?secret="+t,e.setAttribute("data-secret",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:"ready",secret:t},"*")},!1)))}(window,document);
/* ]]&gt; */
&lt;/script&gt;
</html><description>Days after the Obama administration finalized plans to reduce carbon emissions, some climate scientists have criticized the administration for failing to detail how the regulations will lower global temperatures. These critics suggest the administration used the plan more to inspire global climate action, rather than using it as a concrete step to make the earth cooler. On Monday, the Obama administration finalized the Clean Power Plan, which would overhaul America's energy system by striving to reduce carbon emissions from power plants 32 percent by 2030.</description><thumbnail_url>https://climatechangedispatch.com/wp-content/uploads/images_pics8_gina.jpg</thumbnail_url></oembed>
