Once more, science provides bad news for global warming alarmists. U.S. CO2 levels again declined during 2017, despite overall global output again rising. Credit U.S. fracking and the natural gas boom.
But don’t worry: the hysteria won’t end.
The new report, based on U.S. data, shows clearly the U.S. continuing downward trend.
“The U.S. emitted 15.6 metric tons of CO2 per person in 1950,” wrote the Daily Caller. “After rising for decades, it’s declined in recent years to 15.8 metric tons per person in 2017, the lowest measured levels in 67 years.”
That’s right. 67 years. Green groups and leftist climate extremists should be exulting. The U.S. has found a way to produce more GDP — making all of us better off — with less energy.
Meanwhile, Europe has imposed massive economy-deadening regulations on its economies in order to reduce CO2 output. How has that worked?
Last year, European output of CO2 rose 1.5%, while U.S. output fell 0.5%. For the record, the disaster predicted when President Trump left the Paris climate agreement and rejected draconian EPA restrictions on power plants hasn’t materialized. On the contrary, the U.S. model has been shown to be superior.
This isn’t the first time we’ve reported the ongoing decline in U.S. CO2. And if current trends hold, it won’t be the last. And, to be sure, it is a long-term trend.
The U.S. Energy Information Administration’s latest energy report notes that from 2005 to 2017, U.S. energy-related emissions of carbon dioxide plunged by 861 million metric tons, a 14% drop.
It’s both a result of the decline due to the Great Recession and the fracking revolution.
The EIA forecast expects a slight uptick over the next two years in the U.S. as the economy continues its Trump boom. But it will still be way below where it was 13 years ago.
Question: Over the same period, how did the rest of the world do? Emissions rose by 21%to 6.04 billion metric tons over the 12 years, mostly due to booming economic growth in India and China, where coal-fired energy output continues to expand.
The truth, and it’s proven by the hard data, is that CO2 made in the USA will not choke the world to death or cause it to massively overheat. And you can thank capitalism for that.
Because capitalism, unlike socialism and its welfare-state kin, hates waste. So it does all it can to be efficient. That means using as little energy as possible to make things. And this predates any of the current CO2 hysteria.
In the U.S., the data are clear and utterly convincing: In 1949, it took 1,098 metric tons of CO2 emissions to produce $1 million in GDP in the U.S., after adjusting for inflation.
Today, it takes just 301 metric tons to produce that same million dollars, after inflation — a 73% gain in carbon-efficiency.
Indeed, we’re actually decarbonizing our economy, and rapidly.
As new technologies continue to emerge, including better battery storage for alternative energy sources, safer nuclear power plants, and the fracking revolution that continues to make natural gas the energy of choice for conventional power plants, U.S. CO2 output is likely to continue to decline for every dollar of GDP produced.
Instead of being harshly criticized by green groups and Euro-socialists, as has been the case for three decades now, we should be the model for green growth. When it comes to CO2, the U.S. is the leader. The rest of the world is the laggard. That’s a fact.
If any green groups have had the guts to come forward and laud this truly phenomenal development, we haven’t heard it. We did a Google search and couldn’t find a single instance of an identifiable green group applauding the U.S.’ extraordinary performance on CO2. None.
Green Grumblings
Instead, we continue to hear the same dark grumblings and prognostications of doom that never come true. That includes the mainstream media, too.
You might remind your less-than-informed friends the next time they criticize America’s greenhouse gas output: Not only is the U.S. the only major country that is cutting output, but it is providing a roadmap for how to do it.
Time for the green hypocrites to stop talking, and start doing. Or to admit that it has nothing to do with climate change at all, and everything to do with an extreme-left political agenda masquerading as earth-friendly environmentalism.
Read more at IBD
Green groups don’t want power generation that is carbon-dioxide free, they want no power generation. If wind and solar actually produced reliable power, green groups would come out against them. Don’t believe that? Look at their record on nuclear power plants.
What they really want is to cripple the United States economy as their path to power.
Correct MCPR and the basis of environmentalism is Anti-Capitalism. The above tells the tale of Capitalism vs Socialist doctrine. Capitalism may be deifined in one word: Competition. It is the driver of one simple facet of human nature. PEOPLE WANT!! Within the Pareto Principle the 20% will sacrifice and risk for MORE. 20% will do nothing and 60% will at least apply Vince Lombardi’s ‘Second Effort.’
All technology is that deep effort of CREATITVITY and if you look at history all products have become lighter, stronger, more durable and CHEAPER. Much more to this but the politics are as such. Socialism does not incentivive rewards. It only supplies a state of mediocrity.
MCPR right you are . Backed by the activist billionaires from California
and others hoping to short the USA economy .
Green groups could care less if Co2 levels drop . If anything it undercuts their
scary climate boogie man sales rain maker . No fret no cash .
Wind and solar power need 100% back up for when there are no sunshine and breezes which is usually in the form of the most inefficient natural gas power. Also idling power plants waste a huge amount of energy. Taking nuclear offline puts more load on fossil fuels also – hence EU increase in CO2 production in 2017.
Because the Greens wont be happy until America is reduced to a miserble 3rd World Nation who worships false deities like Gaia and sacrifice Virgins and Children to their false gods
Socialists are romantics. Capitalists are technocrats. Socialists love their wind turbines and solar panels, despite the failure to supply dependable energy. The technology that supplies the bulk of our electricity is profitable and unsubsidized.
I say that the Greens and Elon Musk’s of today are conning the gullible dreamers out there.