Another Global Warming Study Casts Doubt On Media’s Climate Change Fairy Tale

With climate change activists and the big media still in high dudgeon over President Trump pulling out of the Paris Climate Deal, yet another study shows no acceleration in global warming for the last 23 years. Piece by piece, the church of global warming is being dismantled.

The University of Alabama-Huntsville study, conducted by climate scientists John Christy and Richard McNider, shows that not only is the temperature rising far more slowly than predicted, but that the Earth’s atmosphere appears to be less sensitive to changing CO2 levels than previously assumed.

How do the study’s authors know this? They corrected a mistake that many other studies and model forecasts leave uncorrected: First, they used only satellite data, the most comprehensive and accurate temperature numbers available.

Then, they took out the temporary, yet significant, impact of both volcanoes and the El Niño and La Niña climate episodes that periodically wreak havoc on weather around the world.

Once removing the influence of those naturally occurring events,  the study’s authors were able to come up with a stable base temperature for the world. Doing this, they found that the rate of global warming currently was 0.096 degrees Celsius per decade — exactly what it was 23 years ago.

This casts serious doubts on the dozens of models used in coming up with the U.N. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s dire forecast of massive global warming based on rising levels of CO2 in the atmosphere, mainly from human activity.

Given that CO2 levels have risen sharply in recent decades but the pace of warming has remained essentially the same suggests that CO2 doesn’t have the warming effect that many models assume.

Rick Moran, writing at the American Thinker, puts it this way: “The UAH paper destroys the models that predict rising temps that correlate with rising CO2 levels.”

Yep. And it means that the U.N.’s prescription for this surge in CO2 — the massive downsizing of the global economy and the imposition of rigid socialist planning on all industrial economies — is nothing more than quackery, the worst kind of medicine.

But it’s the science that is important. Recent analytical studies of global warming models used for the U.N. predictions have found they tend to “run hot” — that is, predict far more warming than actually occurs. This study goes a long way to explaining why.

And over time, the difference in temperature estimates is enormous. Going all the way back to 1880, the study notes that most climate models predict nearly 4.1 degrees Fahrenheit rise in temperatures. But the calculated value from the actual data is less than half that, 2 degrees F.

And by the way, this is a published, peer-reviewed journal study, not a bunch of estimates from questionable mathematical models that were created to serve a political purpose, not a scientific one. It is of course in the interest of the researchers and the governments that fund them to find catastrophic global warming. And that’s exactly what they do.

Sadly, this is yet another study that the media will, for the most part, ignore. That’s especially true since Christy, a scientist with an impeccable reputation, is known for poking holes in the global warming religion’s dogma.

At some point, the left-leaning big media will be forced to recognize the growing evidence of the global warming fraud — just as the holier-than-thou media have in recent days had to come to grips with the tragic reality that the media outlets they work for are filled with serial sexual predators.

Read more at IBD

Trackback from your site.

Comments (14)

  • Avatar

    Spurwing Plover

    |

    The New York Pravda(Times)nothing but Lies just plain Lies Lies Lies 24/7 52 weeks and 365 day and 12 months from the Old Grey Hag LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES SQUAWK SKREEE,SKREET,SCREACH

    Reply

    • Avatar

      Sonnyhill

      |

      Another puddle of rakooi below.

      Reply

  • Avatar

    rakooi

    |

    Reread this article again…and remember, for years This Opinion Media site and many others have been saying there IS NO WARMING FOR 10 straight years, then it was NO WARMING FOR 15 STRAIGHT YEARS…..and THEN NO WARMING for 20 YEARS….
    ….
    OOOPS…..Now they are admitting that there has been warming
    AT THE SAME RATE FOR THE LAST 30 YEARS…just no rate increase.

    THAT IS A HUGE ADMISSION…after Spreading Malarkey for Decades!
    .. and in the process of spreading Malarkey,
    …THEY HAVE CALLED A LOT OF MEN & WOMEN dedicated to science
    ALL KINDS OF NAMES….from Marxists, Liars, Get-RICH Schemers, One World Government Types….and those are the polite insults.
    “I’ll see you in the Funny Papers! “

    Reply

    • Avatar

      Sonnyhill

      |

      It was always no rate increase. Even I understood that. Historical data was fuct with by the Warmists in order to show that the rate of warming was accelerating. Not true.

      Reply

    • Avatar

      JayPee

      |

      When scientific proof is proffered that there is a greenhouse effect as presumed by jerks like you and as described by the rest of the alarmist cretins, only then will your oral excrement be worthy of attention.
      In the meantime, you can stand atop your soapbox and receive all the derision you deserve.

      Reply

    • Avatar

      David Lewis

      |

      You are like a drowning man grasping at straws. I did re-read the article and didn’t interpret it the same way you did. It doesn’t matter because even within the statement you made there is no inconsistency. We can have a warming rate over a longer period of time that includes shorter times of no warming.

      RAKOOI you have dismissed the validity of a number of articles because they were not peer reviewed. Now there is an article that is peer reviewed and you come up with some lame argument.

      My question is what is the real reason you believe in the climate change fraud? Do you want to use it to destroy free enterprise, expand the power of government, or an excuse to raise taxes? My guess is some professors have told you what to believe and you are not smart enough to think for yourself.

      Reply

  • Avatar

    Spurwing Plover

    |

    Like all Eco-Wackos Rakooi thinks with their mouth not with their brain which is why their always sticking their foot into their mouths Al Bore Leonardo DiCaprio are just two examples of what i’m squawking about

    Reply

  • Avatar

    Amber

    |

    The cooked up scary global warming con-game is the gun in a $trillion dollar heist . No warming no problem …. but hey what about that vague , open ended irrefutable catch all term climate change ? That big whopper is even more fanciful than the abandoned ” earth has a fever ” because it rests on the
    falsehood that humans are now the drivers of climate change .
    The convenient truth is interests aligned to justify the further fleecing of tax payers . Grant seeking corporations , “scientists” ,
    all levels of government hungry for new cash to waste and just your every day crooks trying to get a piece of the action .
    The root causes of global warming (climate change ) are greed and governments with tax payer credit cards with no limits .

    Reply

  • Avatar

    Sonnyhill

    |

    Amber, you get it and I get it. What is happening to the brains of the current generation that doesn’t get it ? Yet.
    Back in the 60’s youngsters ranted and rioted against the military industrial complex. Where is their voice now that they’re fat, rich and retired?
    We get too soon old and too late smart.
    Kids, take that nugget to the bank.

    Reply

  • Avatar

    Sonnyhill

    |

    Gotta ask….why are the Warmist intelligentsia absent here? Drew / Rakooi? Best you got?
    They’re not here because they don’t want public failure.
    Where are Michael Mann’s friends? Apparently he has none.

    Reply

  • Avatar

    Amber

    |

    SONNYHILL .. “Where is their voice ” ? That is an excellent question .
    Identity politics focus , MSM willful and deliberate agenda to screen out other perspectives , Playstation, Netflix , illiteracy in science , a misplaced belief science is pure , government manipulation to
    justify globalization and more taxes as they have reached the point of diminishing returns on traditional sources .
    I’m sure you have your own list but the broader question you raise
    is worth a lot of consideration . Perhaps one silver lining is the internet allows some push back among people globally . Jo Nova’s site for example.
    The significant contribution of many scientists who have had the courage to face professional and personal criticism to preserve and defend the scientific method is very encouraging .

    Reply

  • Avatar

    Sonnyhill

    |

    How many people welcome attacks on their beliefs? It’s personal. The Left implants beliefs at a young age, when children (and parents) trust teachers. While society is wary of predators, no one suspects that curriculum is grooming a flock to be fleeced.

    Reply

  • Avatar

    Amber

    |

    Regrettably you are correct SONNYHILL . From what I’m seeing Liberal propaganda from teachers is much more prevalent . If creativity is stymied and freedom of speech is discouraged on line courses will easily replace traditional teachers selling their views and just think of the reduced “carbon footprint ” .
    How long before “Amazon School “wipes out bricks and mortar schools along with the left wing sales staff ? The sooner the better .

    Reply

  • Avatar

    Spurwing Plover

    |

    The NEA,NRDC,EDF,Greenpeace Etc brainwashing school kids with lies lying text books and the Useless Nations as well

    Reply

Leave a comment