WaPo Pushes Global Warming Theory Based On Movie ‘The Day After Tomorrow’

blizzardThe Washington Post’s Chris Mooney tried to tie man-made warming to massive winter blizzards Monday, like the one that left millions of Americans covered in two feet of snow over the weekend.

The article, published Monday afternoon, was provocatively titled “The Surprising Way That Climate Change Could Worsen East Coast Blizzards.”

The piece restates a hypothesis from global warming science blog RealClimate.org that draws comparisons to the film “The Day After Tomorrow,” where global warming causes a new ice age. In the movie, global warming shuts down ocean currents and creates weather catastrophes, including a worldwide blizzard.

“They had these blizzards for completely the wrong reasons, but the end result is a big snow storm,” climate scientist Stefan Rahmstorf of RealClimate.org told The Washington Post. “And that’s kind of ironic: Despite the wrong physics, there’s a grain of truth now in that movie.”

Mooney and Rahmstorf argue global warming melted fresh water ice caps, which disrupted global salinity levels and increased the temperature of the ocean. Together, these two factors disrupted ocean currents enough to strengthen Winter Storm Jonas.

The Washington Post openly admits the “[w]e certainly can’t say that his argument is, at this point, a matter of scientific consensus or anything close to it.” The Post even points out that many scientists completely disagree with the hypothesis in a separate article.

Climate scientist Michael Mann of Penn State University whole-heartedly believes the blizzard was caused by global warming. “While critics like to claim that these massive winter storms are evidence against climate change, they are actually favored by climate change,” Mann told ThinkProgress before tweeting his opinion.

Read rest…

Trackback from your site.

Leave a comment (newest first):

Comments (4)

  • Avatar

    JayPee

    |

    It seems there is always a wannabe who can find a phrase by Nostradamus that ” predicts ” some later event. Or a Biblical phrase as well.

    And that’s supposed to be
    PROOF OF WHAT ?

    That’s the ” grain of truth ” argument of why they think obvious fiction should be taken as dogmatic prophecy.

    It can become even more laughable if they would start citing the queer-ran.

    Reply

  • Avatar

    David Lewis

    |

    JayPee, you are right. They are using the fiction, “The Day After Tomorrow”, so support the fiction of man made climate change.

    If climate change caused by man is responsible for the blizzard of 2016, then what caused the blizzards of January 28, 1772, March 11-13, 1888, and February 1899?

    Reply

  • Avatar

    Ralph

    |

    I can’t help but wonder why this movie is listed as an “action adventure” movie instead of what it actually is, a science fiction movie.

    Reply

  • Avatar

    Me

    |

    😆 That was too funny, and arctic wolves will appear and attack and sharknadoes will appear and attack.

    Reply

Leave a comment

No Trackbacks.