U.N. planning court to judge U.S. for ‘climate justice’

courtAt the upcoming United Nations Climate Summit in Paris, participating nations have prepared a treaty that would create an “International Tribunal of Climate Justice” giving Third World countries the power to haul the U.S. into a global court with enforcement powers.

Congress would be bypassed – left out in the cold – by this climate deal, critics say.

Policies once left to sovereign nations could be turned over to a U.N. body if the U.S. and its allies approve the proposed deal in Paris during the summit scheduled for Nov. 30-Dec. 11.

According to the proposed draft text of the climate treaty, the tribunal would take up issues such as “climate justice,” “climate finance,” “technology transfers,” and “climate debt.”

Buried on page 19 of the 34-page document is the critical text – still heavily bracketed with text that hasn’t been completely resolved and agreed upon – reads:

[An International Tribunal of Climate Justice as][A] [compliance mechanism] is hereby established to address cases of non-compliance of the commitments of developed country Parties on mitigation, adaptation, [provision of] finance, technology development and transfer [and][,] capacity-building[,] and transparency of action and support, including through the development of an indicative list of consequences, taking into account the cause, type, degree and frequency of non-compliance.

The U.N. held a preparatory conference in September in Bonn, Germany, that drafted language to be approved at the upcoming Paris climate summit. At the Bonn meeting the U.N. brought together more than 2,000 participants from governments, observer organizations and the media.

But none of those media chose to report on the proposed new global tribunal.

The Paris Conference is mandated to adopt “a protocol, another legal instrument or an agreed outcome with legal force under the Convention applicable to all parties,” which is to come into force in 2020, according to IISD Reporting Services, which tracks the global sustainable development movement.

Like many initiatives that come out of the U.N., there has been a media blackout on coverage of the potential for a new world tribunal that would make binding decisions on a host of issues critical to the U.S. economy. The draft text has been available on the Internet since Oct. 20 for all to see.

“The only mentions one is likely to find with search engines are alarms being sounded by critics, the climate realists who reject the apocalyptic predictions (and discredited pseudo-science – see: here, here, and here) of the multi-billion dollar global warming lobby,” writes William F. Jasper for the New American magazine.

China, India behind the move

One such critic is the Craig Rucker, executive director and co-founder of CFACT.

Rucker points out that more than 130 developing nations – “led by South Africa and instigated by China and India” – are insisting they will not sign a climate deal in Paris unless it contains massive redistribution of wealth from developed to poor nations.

“Now they want the power to haul the U.S. and its allies before a U.N. Star Chamber to enforce compliance,” Rucker writes.

He also notes that this is not the first time the U.N. has tried to insert language creating a global climate court into a U.N. climate document. It happened in 2011 at a summit in Durban but was stripped at the last minute when CFACT blew the whistle and some media outlets picked up the story.

But this time around, the globalists writing the text have substituted the world “tribunal” for “court” and insist the body will be “non-judicial.”

Read rest…

Comments (4)

  • Avatar



    What is going on in the USA when both houses of elected representatives are by passed from approving international agreements that involve $$Billions of dollars in tax payer funded spending ?

    Are the Republicans on a permanent vacation ? Do Democrats support international agreements by passing Congress ? What were they elected to do ?

  • Avatar

    Captain Dave


    Any western politician that tries to sign on to the spirit of this agreement should be charged with treason.

  • Avatar



    Ever get the idea that the UN is an arrogant lawless monstrosity which has no reason to exist ?

    The League of Nations was a monument to the idiocy of the Versailles Treaty and Woody Wilson.

    The UN will eventually be recognized as proof of the megalomanic stupidity of Franklin Roosevelt and Harry Truman.

    Churchill thought it was a bad idea !

  • Avatar



    The UN has always wanted to be self-autonomous and unanswerably authoritarian. This is how they intend to do it.

    You have no right to exercise your will without their approval.

    And you will be judged even ex post facto if they disagree with anything you have done.

    This will apply not only to governments but individuals as well.

    This is the totalitarian demand of the UN.

    An utterly corrupt and lawless entity disguised and protected by the shield of diplomatic immunity.

    It is a criminally corrupt entity
    It should be destroyed.

Comments are closed